Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-13 1400 +Flat Earth Math
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqovzNGqtqo&google_comment_id=z12igtt4ckyeu3vqv04cch0yppqywtvasnc0k
- https://pastebin.com/AuTMcTaR
- __
- +Flat Earth Math __ ::sigh:: Has it not crossed your mind as to why it would be that out of a *multi-hour "EVA"* just 3 seconds would show "scuba-divers" at the very start of a clip that's less than 10 minutes in duration?
- How convenient that it permits "Jeranism" and pals to allege that the other apparent anomalies seen in the video are in fact *also* "scuba-divers" that have been "live-edited out" (which makes no sense if it's fake because there would be no need to do anything live - it's not as though people on Earth can see what they're doing).
- __
- You are still ranting about the underwater photography. I have already pointed out that you are making an *impossible request* and that even if a clip could be procured *you would only fault it and shift the goal posts*.
- Yes - you would.
- So please approach this problem as though you have an IQ that's at least average. What is the best and easiest way to solve this?
- __
- I have asserted that the clip "Jeranism" used is a fake "NASA" clip. I have asserted that what "Jeranism" points out in his disinformation video *does not exist in the official "NASA" archives*. There is a reason why I have asserted these things.
- You are failing to understand why I am using this approach and why I am not ranting and raving about underwater photography like you are.
- __
- First - let us suppose "Jeranism" is correct and that "scuba-divers" are indeed being "live-edited out".
- Would you ever expect to see fully suited divers complete with air bubbles in an official live-stream of an "EVA"? *Of course not* - don't be retarded.
- All you can expect to see if it were being faked as "Jeranism" alleges would be "video artefacts" - _such as what "Jeranism" has pointed out in his disinformation video_.
- Given that all we can see are "video artefacts" *it is open to interpretation*. You will allege the video artefacts are innocent whereas "Jeranism" will insist they are indicative of "scuba-divers" that have been "live-edited" out (a ridiculous notion).
- But "Jeranism" is able to support his supposition *because he can point to the first three seconds of the video that does show actual "scuba-divers"*!
- Hey - isn't that neat? Isn't that convenient? Could that video "Jeranism" used have been any more convenient?
- And now I must remind you. *The target audience of "Jeranism" is not you or me*. His target audience are intellectually vulnerable people who are unable to rule things in or out for themselves. They trust "Jeranism" because he "sounds honest" and is "naturally charming" and to them he sounds like he knows what he's talking about (lolz).
- Please keep that in mind.
- __
- Now let's suppose "Jeranism" were pointing out something *more obvious than mere "video artefacts"*. Let's suppose instead that "Jeranism" *could actually point out genuine "scuba-divers" appearing during the alleged "EVA"*.
- What then? Then the answer should be *obvious*. At that point - rather than rant and rave about underwater photography you would say:
- *"Hang on - this is bullsh!t - prove that this is a genuine NASA video because NASA sure as f_kc aren't in the habit of using scuba-divers to help with their EVAs!"*
- Do you see? Because the "video artefacts" are obscure and could be anything - you can rant and rave about underwater photography and get nowhere. But if the video artefacts were unmistakeably scuba-divers then you would put your photography questions aside and seek confirmation we are looking at a genuine "NASA" video.
- __
- The correct approach to this problem is to dismiss what "Jeranism" has presented as a fake "NASA" video until it can be confirmed/verified by official "NASA" archives.
- It won't be though. Because I can see that the "source" video has been tampered with.
- __
- And to respond to what you wrote elsewhere - *of course "NASA" would have this EVA in their archives*! Do you REALLY think that "NASA" - who spend millions to billions training for and preparing for these "EVAs" would not bother to keep a recording of it?
- HAHAHAHAHA come on... are you even trying?
- If the "EVA" footage could exist for some chump in 2009 to stream and then upload to YouTube *then it f_kcing exists in the "NASA" archives*!
- Don't bullsh!t me on that.
- Now if it DOESN'T exist in the "NASA" archives (i.e., we cannot confirm it is a genuine video) - well - what does that suggest? It suggests "NASA" is somehow involved and I've already explained that to you.
- In fact - I have already explained a great many things to you but evidently you do not pay attention.
- __
- If you cannot give a sensible response to this then I must write you off as a time-waster and cease communicating with you.
- And if that's how you want it to be then all the best with your "Flat Earth Math" as you debate a dishonest charlatan who will never concede a single point unless you start asking the right questions.
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment