(Tells): An abrupt memory strikes you - the notion of Leau telling you,
"Greetting Conduit, with one of your secretariats raiding bloodloch and
all I was wondering if you agreed with that stance. Or if you would
like to possibly take a look at our treaty and modify it so that it
withstand the times to come? Personally I am sorry what is happening to
your city being ransacked by the syssin, and the open bullying they are
doing to those that aren't syssin, But I am not sorry for those that
willingly subjugate themselves to them such as Aarbrok who has broken
our treaty."
(Tells): You tell Leau, "Yes, it is a bit messy, isn't it? The official
Cabalist stance on the entire debacle is one of non-engagement- it is
not terribly relevant to our official goals as a guild, so any
involvement by Cabalists is purely on personal decision and will not be
backed by the guild in an official manner."
(Tells): You tell Leau, "In regard to non-aggression, however, I have
examined the Cabalist-Bloodloch treaty, and the wording implies that
the non-aggression adhered to actually stems from the inter-guild
treaties we have- that is, we have agreed in the Bloodloch treaty to
adhere to non-aggression pacts stated in our Bloodloch-affiliated-
organisation treaties."
(Tells): You tell Leau, "The only Bloodloch-affiliated-organisation
treaty that we had which contained a non-aggression pact was one with
the Indorani, which their guildmaster dissolved before he was replaced."