Mouthybuddha

https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5149972

2 things:

1. Skeptics show themselves to be, in fact, a community of partisans who use social pressure to prevent principles from being transgressed. Solipsistic, insular, moralizing. because this is all they can do to keep out wrongthink as they did with Rage and others who went against the narrative

2. This is too performative to be sincere. His story about "no longer having empathy for non-whites, seeing everyone as groups instead of loving them" seems particular is designed around skeptic community biases about how collectivism is some evil magic spell rather than a fact of life

Whole point is to verify the "lack of enpathy and humanity" to justify the dishonesty and well-poisoning which was always going on.

And he is a Judas, he is being paid with more attention and praise for redeeming himself. Why else be so performative? https://mouthybuddha.bandcamp.com/track/walking-away-from-the-red-pill?from=twittercard

And he is slavishly bootlicking the lowest skeptics

And his Zen idea has never worked out in society, it's hypothetical, a hypothetical Buddhist societies themselves dont reach and he frankly alluded to that it would require authoritarianism to accomplish (ie no moral argument remains). Moreover, the shifting nature of individual identity does not necessarily mean much for group dynamics. In fact, group dynamics could be seen as the collective common core to these organically linked individuals we call groups. Moreover, factional identitarian interests could only impede this sort of self-actualization in my opinion, even if just as a distraction from working on it for the individual. So homogeneity is preferred is it not?