Here we get a classic speed and skill vs strength and durability debate, and I'm leaning on.....strength and durability. Weird

Ame chooses a couple weird hills to die on here. We are all aware that shattering a sword is still transferring force to the object it hits, so going full Shapiro with the "OBJECTIVELY Death Knight has NO blunt DURABILITY feats and would be EASILY ONE-SHOT" is a bit cringe. On the other hand, he does a good job attacking DK's speed and propping Aphrodite up as the faster combatant.

There's a lot of back and forth about the AI and what information and scanning capability it possesses. Darg does well to point out that DK doesn't have video game weak points and its massive physical strength helps defend against Aphrodite's common tactics. Ame also does well here, claiming that even basic knowledge of joints and bone structure will prove useful.

I think if Darg had leaned more heavily on DK's shield or had more evidence to back up a good speed for it, he would have taken things more cleanly. I like his arguments regarding Aphrodite's endurance, and thought that his arguments were overall "cleaner" but that they were focused too heavily on points like DK's direct durability (which was a flaw on both sides honestly, too much sword feat, tired of talking about it) Death Knight just seems to be too durable to put down before Aphrodite ends up getting hit once. Any real amount of argument from Ame comparing sword breaking to concrete would have probably swung things but thems the breaks

Darg win, barely