Day 293.2 Carter SilverScript Aug 12 2017

Day 293.2 Carter SilverScript Aug 12 2017

Not Waiting to Try This Case - You Are a Juror Today in Carter v US

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw7FfoqAp60

 Transcript
0:02
okay day 294 this is part 2 you are not
0:06
gonna have to wait you don't have to
0:08
wait no waiting you can be a juror today
0:11
you can sit in the jury box today you
0:13
can listen to this case you can actively
0:16
participate you can weigh in you can
0:18
give your legal opinion legal scholars
0:21
all over the world will be engaged in
0:22
this case this is going to be the big
0:24
one this is going to be the Dred Scott
0:26
of the 21st century here is the case
0:30
I'll lay it out for you first of all let
0:32
me say the beautiful beautiful work of
0:35
Jason Goodman is up on crowdsource the
0:37
truth about Lionel nation why did we
0:39
wait till today for Lionel nation well I
0:41
don't know maybe because we had the
0:43
biggest case in the 21st century in
0:46
terms of law and your rights as a
0:48
citizen and the information the system
0:50
collects upon you the fusion centers
0:53
that fusing together of all these
0:54
different information sources to be used
0:57
against you in an illegal search that's
0:58
something called a mosaic search the
1:00
mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment so
1:02
that's gonna be about this cases about
1:04
you it's not about me it's not about
1:06
anyway that's about all of us so Lionel
1:08
the tremendous scholar I don't think
1:10
people realized I think you know he's so
1:12
funny and everything I think they
1:14
realized that he is a legal scholar and
1:16
steps in for the rights of every person
1:19
in the United States every day on RT and
1:22
other channels I think he's gonna borrow
1:24
a to be get to be very famous here very
1:26
quickly I can't say any more about that
1:28
but I am gonna say that it was a
1:30
beautifully shot beautifully cut piece
1:32
that Jason Goodman did and if you
1:34
haven't seen it you owe it to yourself
1:36
but getting back to the case well we're
1:39
gonna give three precedents cuz three is
1:40
a good number three is a good number and
1:42
they're all gonna be easy names it could
1:43
be Jones they're gonna be Graham and
1:45
they're gonna be Carter Jones Graham and
1:46
Carter almost sounds like so you can see
1:48
where I'm at Greystone I'm in Yonkers
1:51
today and I'll explain that later
1:52
because I had to go to visit somebody at
1:55
a hospital say hello to somebody at
1:57
hospital I'm not gonna say who anyway so
2:00
easy names easy names Jones Graham
2:03
Carter you can think of Graham like
2:06
Lindsey Graham right so you got one out
2:08
of the way Jones you can think of a lot
2:10
of different Joneses right you can think
2:11
of farmer Jones legal expert
2:13
down in Florida who's given us great
2:15
background on fundamental rights ho boy
2:18
here comes a train so we'll be able to
2:21
see the train of justice coming train of
2:23
trust this is going to be delivering
2:24
everybody their rights here it comes
2:27
as your rights are coming
2:32
at the train of justice coming from
2:34
Florida coming from Sanford Florida the
2:36
auto train bringing all those cars back
2:38
to the people that got him stolen here
2:40
in the Bronx and Yonkers there go strand
2:43
of justice I wish it had all those cars
2:45
we're gonna get all those cars back
2:46
don't worry we're gonna follow the gonna
2:48
follow the Bentley's back here and all
2:50
the other exotic cars are gonna get the
2:51
cars back we're gonna follow that back
2:52
we had a great show on crowd source of
2:55
truth on Bill Warren if you haven't seen
2:56
it go look at last night's show but so
2:59
you look how easy this is
3:00
you got Jones that's easy you got Grand
3:03
got Lindsey Graham that's gonna be the
3:04
government side that's gonna be the bad
3:05
guys side so you could be able to
3:07
remember that easy and you got Carter
3:09
well I know Carter because of the Carter
3:10
phone decision the Carter phone decision
3:13
was what opened up your right to carry a
3:15
cell phone and my dad used that Carter
3:18
phone decision to come up with a with
3:19
the cellular phone not the cellular
3:21
phone but the cordless phone which
3:24
there's a whole bunch of stuff a whole
3:26
bunch of legal stuff that happens there
3:27
so you got the Carter decision that was
3:29
filed three days ago about illegal
3:30
search and seizure whether people got
3:33
127 days of data can you imagine a
3:35
police officer following you for a
3:37
hundred and see that police officer
3:38
right there you imagine that police
3:39
officer following you for 127 days day
3:42
and night would you would you call
3:44
somebody and say hey that seems like any
3:45
illegal search imagine that police
3:47
officer right there right down there
3:49
following you for 127 days day and night
3:51
day and night you'd say that to me on an
3:54
unreasonable search he's gonna sit right
3:57
there he's gonna watch you for 127 days
4:00
day and night night and day teams and
4:03
teams that's exactly what Carter is all
4:04
about Carter is about being followed for
4:07
127 days it's called cell tower at CSL I
4:11
believe it is cell site location
4:13
information see SLI you can see the CL
4:16
CS Li information going to be more and
4:19
more a part of court cases in the future
4:22
on this subject so here's how it's gonna
4:23
go Jones Jones guys I'm trying to think
4:26
of a good name for Jones just too many
4:28
Joneses I remember Jones Cleon Jones who
4:31
was the center fielder for or maybe the
4:33
left fielder for the New York Mets
4:37
Barbara Jones Barbara Jones fundamental
4:40
rights farmer Jones fundamental Jones
4:41
and farmer rights but fundamental rights
4:44
and farmer Jones talking about that need
4:47
for strict scrutiny any time a
4:50
government invades on someone's Fourth
4:52
Amendment rights and doesn't he only the
4:54
illegal search so Jones is gonna be 2012
4:57
now you're up to date on that you just
4:58
you just saved yourself about 18 hour or
5:01
18 days of reading case law now you're
5:03
up to date on that that was in a robbery
5:06
though so he was saying hey you can't
5:08
look at my cell phone data because I was
5:10
in a robbery right well that's different
5:12
than being a reporter waiting for a
5:15
waiting for a source and the government
5:18
intercepting your phone calls and maybe
5:19
even sting ringing your phone calls to
5:21
find out who your sources are right so
5:23
that's that's the Jones case and they
5:25
they want well then the government came
5:27
back with a Graham case and said well
5:29
cell phone data can be used right so
5:32
that I may be wrong there the Graham
5:34
data may be saying that the person was
5:36
involved in a robbery therefore we can
5:38
use the data I think I got that wrong so
5:40
and we're gonna respond with Carter's
5:43
today which is this 128 days there he is
5:45
down there just imagine him 128 days
5:49
following you around there's another one
5:51
as suppose it was g4s suppose that car
5:53
that just came in there was g4s and
5:55
there was another one with the red car
5:57
and they just were working in a rotation
5:59
and all of a sudden hey this is legal
6:00
they're all making money it's a black
6:02
budget they're all g4s subcontractors of
6:05
the FBI no problem right so we're gonna
6:08
have precedent the great thing about all
6:10
this is all the case law all the
6:12
research has already been done you as a
6:13
juror get to just sit back and listen to
6:15
the arguments that are gonna be
6:16
presented and you've got the toda chef's
6:20
case the tsarnaev case the Boston bomber
6:22
case the ACLU case that's all one thing
6:24
boom right there in Boston so you're
6:26
familiar with one of these big cases
6:28
where they are saying look you can't
6:30
hire let's just say those two cars the
6:33
guy meet with the police officer down
6:35
there and so forth let's just say that's
6:36
g4s that's a local liaison between JTTF
6:40
and the FBI let's just say that's a
6:42
meeting going on down there where
6:43
they're meeting down there that's not
6:45
good
6:46
we've got to be able to expose that this
6:48
case is just about
6:49
exposing threats to your Fourth
6:52
Amendment right you're one of your
6:53
fundamental rights and once you
6:56
geolocate once you geolocate and you
6:59
start pinging the next step is now I can
7:03
intercept I can find out who your
7:04
sources are I have sources to the
7:07
uranium guys okay that what's happening
7:09
with this the FBI directors uranium
7:12
trade I've got the Petraeus spy ring
7:15
with the ax wands doing their stuff in
7:16
Congress and doing their stuff in calm
7:18
doing their stuff in the State
7:20
Department so you got all these things
7:22
going on where now they want to crush
7:24
that they want to be like CrowdStrike
7:26
they want to give their soul away and
7:27
beat Sean Henry and be able to go in and
7:28
crush any kind of whistleblower right
7:31
like they did the DNC like they did at
7:33
other places so they want this
7:36
capability now to intercept these
7:37
communications with journalists and be
7:39
able to figure out who our sources are
7:41
so they can go get deep blackberry they
7:42
want to go get deep uranium they want to
7:44
go get the uranium five downstream they
7:46
want to go get deep loan they want to go
7:48
get all these guys all right they want
7:50
to start monitoring all their
7:51
communications they're gonna look at it
7:52
like Snowden described with the social
7:54
tree structure the little tree structure
7:56
of the selectors that Michael Hayden was
7:57
so proud of you know you can make a
7:59
social graph then we're gonna you know
8:01
go get everybody's communication you
8:02
know go do deep dives on everybody you'd
8:05
ever got a chance to vote on Snowden you
8:08
saw all the information come out and you
8:10
never got a chance to vote on it there
8:11
was no court of public opinion right no
8:14
one ever kept you apprised as a
8:15
journalist of the key cases in this in
8:17
these in this battle for the Fourth
8:19
Amendment they just wrote an article
8:20
every once in a while let it go I'll bet
8:22
most people in these three cases never
8:25
heard of any of them
8:25
did anybody cover the Carter case that
8:27
was filed yesterday no with the supreme
8:30
court no even though it's fundamentally
8:32
affects every person in the United
8:33
States no so we're going to cover it
8:36
because that's what we're gonna do we're
8:37
gonna engage every legal mind in the
8:39
world every legal mind in the world is
8:41
going to want to weigh in on this
8:42
because it's a fundamental right not
8:44
only the people United States but a
8:45
people to all across the world who are
8:47
looking to the United States looking to
8:49
our Constitution for leadership not
8:51
following they're not looking to us for
8:53
HS pd6
8:55
mister mister Petraeus's scheme has JTTF
8:59
scheme to to place and threaten every
9:02
every government of the world looked at
9:05
look at WikiLeaks HSP d6
9:07
Homeland Security presidential directive
9:08
six you don't play ball you don't let us
9:11
put our political military structure in
9:13
your country oh well no no visas for you
9:17
no soup for you right no visa snow no
9:20
visas you're no medical visas for your
9:22
daughters no intelligence services
9:25
education and American Universities for
9:27
your sons no cars no cars from jello
9:30
no no more jello for you nothing so and
9:34
then we're going to start overthrowing
9:35
you the next day economically or via
9:38
coup like Venezuela is happening right
9:40
now so this case is so far-reaching
9:43
because it's it starts with the Fourth
9:45
Amendment with the illegal search but
9:47
immediately goes after the First
9:48
Amendment and then immediately goes
9:50
after attacking political structures all
9:52
over the world this is the Dred Scott
9:54
it's probably far more significant than
9:56
the Dred Scott case to be honest so you
9:59
get to be the juror we're putting you in
10:01
the jury box you don't have to wait four
10:03
years for this case to be tried we're
10:04
trying it today in the court of the
10:06
world public opinion thank you very much