Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- For 2a, my inequalities seem to match those of the solutions. For 2b, I think my proof does argue what the grader took a point off for: I say that since we're given that the Nash equilibrium must exist, a solver that loops over all subsets must (inevitably) find it.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement