Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 20th, 2017
61
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.08 KB | None | 0 0
  1. "In the Anglosphere (US, UK, Canada, etc.), the media often reports of millionaires losing
  2. half or more of their fortunes to their predatory female ex-wives via the divorce courts.
  3. These millionaires are stupid. Just because you got millions, does not mean you got brains.
  4. Smart millionaires, such as one of my best friends, controls his assets, and does not own
  5. them. I have mentioned him on here before about his nasty divorce with a woman he found in
  6. Mexico. To recap, things were great for about 3 years, then this woman from Mexico turned
  7. into a total predatory female, just like the Anglosphere women are. Anyway, he gave me the
  8. final report of his divorce settlement. Since everything he owns and his profits from his
  9. real estate endeavors legally goes through his mom, and not him, he owns nothing, so there is
  10. nothing for the divorce court to award to his predatory female ex-wife. His predatory female
  11. ex-wife even tried to go after the assets that legally belonged to his mom, but this was
  12. laughed at by his attorney, who shredded the demand letter, and then she experienced the
  13. harsh reality that the divorce court was totally ineffective at "protecting her rights" since
  14. she was legally married to a man that legally owned nothing. She was not married to his mom,
  15. who owned everything. Furthermore, since he legally had no job, child support was very small,
  16. and since he will legally never have a job in the future, his child support payments will
  17. stay at a minimum. I believe the saying "By deception we will conquer" holds true for men in
  18. protecting their assets from predatory females in the Anglosphere. As my friend said, "The
  19. biatch actually thought I owned millions of dollars worth of property", as he laughed his way
  20. out of the divorce court. Hence, by controlling assets in the Anglosphere, and not owning
  21. them, and becoming legally invisible in the labor market, a man can protect his millions
  22. whether by the scenario described above with good and loyal family members owning them or
  23. using trusts or corporations to protect them. Every man must prepare for the worse, hope for
  24. the best."
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement