10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-15 1845 +John le Bon

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-15 1845 +John le Bon
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/CTmzvYbdZ7S
https://pastebin.com/A5AuCmQ1
__


+John le Bon __ One way to know if anyone is doing anything in space is if we *kidnap* an "astronaut" and interrogate him through torture. Some say that the information gained via torture isn't reliable but I disagree. I have always found it to be reliable and effective. If we aren't prepared to actually *kidnap and torture* an "astronaut" then we must approach the issue some other way.

If "space" doesn't exist then of course it follows that the "ISS" does not exist (provided the claim is that the "ISS" is in "space"). The problem is that "normal people" unhesitatingly accept that "space" does exist. They are more certain of it than they are of the "Moon landings". And so attacking the concept of "space" is inefficient.

Besides - there does appear to be a bright light that whizzes past in the sky above according to a timetable found online (eg., "spotthestation") and so that being the case attacking the reality of the alleged "ISS" via "space doesn't exist" arguments is weak and unsatisfactory.

The correct way to attack the alleged "ISS" is to emphasise that even after 15 years "sufficient proof" for it has not yet surfaced - not even accidentally. *"Sufficient proof" is that which necessarily proves an event or claim to be true or real.* In the case of the alleged "ISS" that would involve seeing *"sustained duration genuine micro/zero gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans".*

Such criteria may sound picky and finicky but really it isn't *and "NASA" could produce it in the next 15 minutes* if they wanted. _Yes they could._

A simple five to ten minute "gymnastics routine" where one or two "astronauts" clowned around doing as many zero-gravity somersaults as they could from a single fixed camera would suffice and would also be deeply fascinating - especially to children. (One worthless argument I routinely encounter is that "long duration segments of ISS footage" would somehow be "boring" to audiences.)

Because such footage has not been made available despite apparently decades of allegedly manned "space stations" *it is reasonable to wonder whether sufficient proof either cannot be produced [i.e., the "ISS" is fake] or is being intentionally withheld from us.* Either reason suggests we are living in a lie system. Of course - it does not follow that the absence of such footage means (or "proves") that there is no "ISS". That is absurd. *The absence of sufficient proof does not mean a claim is false.* It might only mean that the "sufficient proof" has not been produced, found or made available. But after 15+ years we are justified in reasonably doubting the alleged "ISS" because the described "sufficient proof" is neither picky nor finicky *and so* we would reasonably have expected to see it by now if there are no "shenanigans" afoot.

The lie system is able to have entire populations believe anything it wants by simply making a claim while never showing sufficient proof for it. *A population's belief is then founded and formed out of trust and proof's appearances* (and mistaking proof's appearances for proof). Once it is accepted as real each individual then finds a way to believe the claim.

This has been going on since birth and by the time we are adults we have trained ourselves to become experts at believing any old nonsense the lie system tells us. At all times our natural intelligence and imagination fill in the blanks. We are exposed to doubtable moments with every lie system claim and that doubt is skilfully suppressed (through what I call "doubt suppression training").

*Suggestions are then repeated into reality.* For example - those who believe that "Jeff C" ("NWA" / "New World Agenda") has been accurately "doxed" only think so because they trust the information source. Just as some (though far fewer in number) accept the "true" identity of "Cognitive Dissonance" was obtained through a clever and elaborate [but "illegal"] Internet "operation".

None of this is surprising because most of the audience are gullible low IQ losers who somehow manage (and it always baffles me) to wash, feed and clothe themselves each day. Anyone with an IQ under 140 - _sorry to say_ - is a chin dribbling retard in "The Bigger Picture". Their otherwise higher "intellect" is used against them to hilarious effect as they find ingenious ways to trap themselves into believing falsehoods and truly clever ways to disregard those who are pointing out valid objections.

Once a person has convinced himself of something (especially with regard to "how the world works") he or she is largely done. Especially if that person is mildly intelligent. *It often requires an even higher intellect to point out the mistakes in another's thinking and the lie system has conveniently engineered a situation where each intelligent person feels an instinctual hate and resentment towards anyone they perceive to be "more intelligent".* That - _and their silly *ego*_ - both serve to keep an otherwise bright person trapped in a falsehood for many years - _typically for a lifetime._ *The world has never been a "rich man's trick" but remains at all times a genius' game.*


The "ISS" is what proves to "normal people" we are living in a lie system (and there can be no "nations" in the lie system). A lot of people who doubt the "Moon landings" will end up believing it happened because they cannot shake the thought: *"But surely Russia would have said something?!"* Это был обман. What is that "planet" called? "Pluto"? In Russian it's called "плутон" (pronounced: "ploo'tOn" [плут'он]). Go look up the Russian word "плут" (pronounced: "ploo't"). The English language is filled with these Russian puns (or it's "just a coincidence"). It has never been a rich man's trick but instead a genius' joke.

It does not occur to "normal people" that the perceived tensions between "Russia and the US" only helped to make the "Moon missions" believable - _irresistibly so_ - in hindsight.

And again - the silly concept of "nations" further prevents "normal people" from ever successfully doubting the alleged "ISS". After all - if it weren't real and manned then wouldn't *China* say something? _With "TransAsia" we introduced the next phase._ We are going to find "China" become increasingly talked about. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam/status/696617974170386432

It turns out that China have their own alleged "space station" called "Tiangong-1" and it is a "joke" when compared to the alleged "ISS". What is the difference? "Hollywood" - _of course._ *But if you accept the concept of "nations" and you don't see the US or Russia (or Iran) calling BS on "Tiangong-1" then people will accept it as real.*

>>> _The audience (of silly spastics) will believe anything *except* the truth._ <<<

And if a silly spastic accepts "Tiangong-1" as real then by golly and by crikey that silly spastic will excitedly dribble and drool all about the alleged "ISS" being real! It's hard to not feel some kind of compassion for these people. These [dys]functional retards are so profoundly stupid that they can unquestioningly accept that "Stephen Hawking" pens books with the twitch of a single cheek muscle and go on speaking, lecturing and interview tours! That a literally *dribbling retard* can be presented to the dummies of the world as a _bona fide_ "genius" is testament to the power of belief *and a consequence of belief-control arising from the repetition of suggestions.*

Be careful what you believe. *And be even more careful with what you give your honest attention to.*

It all comes down to what I have classified as "colour blindness". In my parlance "colour blindness" is the phenomenon whereby a person is unable to discern between real and pretend. To the so-called "colour blind" person something fake simply looks real. Hence everything looks real to the "colour blind". And such people require a "truther guru" like "Jeff C" to inform them as to what is real and what is not. A dependency is naturally formed.

The lie system creates an initial "colour blindness" in us all. Something looks real not because it is *but because the person believes it is.* The belief comes about not because of ever seeing sufficient proof but because of trust and accepting the appearances of proof. *Suggestions are repeated into reality on this placebo planet.* Once a belief has been formed in that way (a "shadow belief") the person is then belief controlled. You could show a hundred fake and worthless CGI images of the alleged "ISS" from Earth showing discernible details and they will all be accepted as real. But then show them some stunning HD photos of "Bigfoot" - _showing details of fur from afar!_ - and they will all be instantly rejected and ridiculed as fake. But both have been equally proven and substantiated. Both are - _as it happens_ - equally plausible. But one is believed to be real whereas the other is rejected because it is believed to be fictional.


__


*If you are not a part of the "Truther Mafia" then you really should not be afraid to distance yourself and go after it.*

Join me as I leisurely make fun of it and them. Because until someone literally punches you in the face they have no power whatsoever over you. It is amusing - _even ticklish_ - like a little kid swinging at you but missing with his little fists because his little arms are simply not long enough.


*Until you're in the trunk of a kidnapper's car you are simply not.*


And to have that kind of proximity a person first needs to invade one's personal space. *One's carefully spun web.* I ask anyone who would think of doing such a thing: *would you be willing to close your eyes and place a finger slowly toward a very nasty looking spider's web?* My response will always be to remind that *suggestions on this placebo planet have no meaningful effect on other magicians.*

And at some point an example - _an enduring and lasting example_ - will be made out of "Jeff C" and his silly "Truther Mafia" which is a crew of *paranoid* and *deviant* stooges.


______


Given that it has taken me a while to get back to this thread I would - _as usual_ - appreciate an extra couple of pairs of Witnessing eyes on my message. Since the following people are up to speed with the kind of things I am writing about they shall be named as follows:



+MsKickup , +cabadejo , +Harry Houdini  , +Terran Downvale (haha I almost added "Brian Hill" by mistake!)




__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w