What really happened 6248 days ago

The sovereignty of interpretation related to 9/11 – Denial of truth pushed to new boundaries
____________________________________________________________________________________________


"Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph."
(Haile Selassie)

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.“ (John 8:32) states a marble inscription at the lobby of CIA headquarters – Today it looks like ethical ambivalence is defined in a wide spectrum by intelligence agencies. No other disaster has changed our historiography in such a way the September 11 attacks did – more than 3000 people died on this tragic day. If you add the casualties from wars justified by this attack, the outcome is a number beyond six hundred thousand.[1] [2].
Only hours after the events, first critical voices arise[3]. These are not people with a semi-professional expertise – but intelligence and terrorism experts. The 9/11 commission report, humorously entitled as 9/11 omission report, does not mention the collapse of building 7[4] in the afternoon of September 11. All the circulating conspiracy theories on the net shouldn’t be depicted here again, but a few inconsistencies are definitely worth a look:

    •	Psychological spects
	•	Passenger manifest anomalies
	•	Withholding of evidence
	•	Air defense scramble discrepancies
	•	Military exercises/drills
	•	Business crime
	•	The legends of the alleged hijackers
	•	The radio transmissions


1. Psychological aspects

In an article which was published in 2010[5] of the journal 'American Behavioral Scientists' the canadian psychologist Laurie Manwell stated, that through the CIA established conspiracy label cognitive functions have been undergoing sustainable transformations. So opponents of conspiracy theories often are not able to think clearly about topics such as 9/11 because information that does not match previous belief patterns cannot be processed rationally.


2. Passenger manifest anomalies

The passenger list is a certificate, that needs to be signed[6] by an authorized person after the completion of the boarding process. The repeatedly occured "correction" of these list bears comparison with falsification of documents.


3. Withholding of evidence

At the Pentagon crime scene, all CCTV recordings showing the alleged plane as it impacts at the western side of the building have been confiscated by the FBI. Similar circumstances are surrounding the collapse of building 7 of the World Trade Centre complex:  If you file a FOIA request to get the data and parameters of NIST’s computer model reconstructing the collapse of that building, your request is being denied – They are justifying it as follows: It would jeopardize public safety. How is it possible that data about a computer model/simulation can jeopardize public safety, if the original building had already undergone a controlled ”conversion” and replaced by its 52 storeys successor? If you follow the explanations of an structural engineer or architect utilising the scientific method, there is prima facie evidence that the building has been brought down by controlled demolition.[7]


4. Air defense scramble discrepancies

Further conspicuous anomalies are the delays and the stagnation in the air defence scramble procedures on that tragic day. For plane hijackings special procedures have been established in the 50s to intervene in a case of emergency. They want to make us cause to believe that these techniques malfunctioned four times this day, although in the period from Sept. 2000 – Sept. 2001 they were 60 of these scrambles that ran successfully? Experts and strategists know furthermore, that during military exercises – that took place in appearance not to be undervalued this day – under no circumstances the realworld stand-by for emergency duties are overridden.[8]


5. Military exercises/drills

At 9/11 the military conducted nationwide at least 4 exercises in parallel.[9]. One of the exercises provided live-fly hijackings[10] – that means planes posing as mocked hijackings were meshed with the realworld commercial air traffic. The radar screens of the realworld ATCs contained fictious blips representing the mocked hijackings. The ATCs weren’t able to distinguish from exercise or emergency. If you have done your homework in the matter of intelligence history[11], you’ll recognize significant patterns matching 1:1 a scheme of a covert operation.


6. Business crime

A company named Convar from Pirmasens, Germany did data recovery for the department of defense utilising the badly damaged harddrives[12]. They concluded that shortly before the attacks financial transactions of more than $100 Mio. had been made – independent from that fact is the evidence of insider trading at the stock exchange: It is incontrovertible[13].


7. The legends of the alleged hijackers

Shortly after 9/11 the BBC reported that several hijackers are alive and well[14]. The official antithesis concerning this matter is, that they are persons with a same name. How is it possible then that their occupations are exactly the same as the ones of the real hijackers? Amongst them are pilots and engineers.


8. The radio transmissions

At 911datasets.org a large amount of data from FOIA requests is available. The distribution of this data has been crowdsourced. A dataset is available that incorporates more than 800 hours of 9/11 radio transmission recordings (military and commercial radio traffic). I just gave that dataset to a senior intelligence officer in my circle of friends. He stated that the authenticity of the files is genuine. If you listen to all of these recordings, a scenario is featured that is different from the official narrative.[15]


Summary

A group of individuals with an exceeding strategy of persuasion I want to mention at this point: These are the ones declaring the official narrative of 9/11 the final, impeccable “truth“ and stigmatize dissidents using the in 1967 by the CIA introduced label conspiracy theorist[16]. Characteristics of the stereotype “Anti-Truther“ are: Everyone that asks critical questions about the official narrative gets denunciated and everything is being done to silence him – Especially in the academic community these intellectual-oppressive patterns are attracting attention, here the one or another academic gets suggested to give no more lectures about this topic, gladly utilizing unethical aids, too. Such a systematic levelling of the public opinion had already taken place in the first quarter of the 20. century – it's high time to prevent this from happening again!

Empirical evidence, from international renowned scientists and researchers[17] [18] is treated as implausible and unreliable and their professional reputation is suddenly challenged – It seems to be nobody wants to be confronted by the truth. Meanwhile Wikipedia has a list of 9/11 conspiracy theories[19]. Mentioned as the cause amongst other things are psychological and sociological aspects and the conspiracy theorist is discredited and the official narrative of 9/11 is declared as the final truth[20]. But stop – didn’t we learn in school, that an encyclopaedic article has to be drafted objectively? At this point, the wikipedia article had failed. Nonbiased as well as neutral enquiries won’t make any sense, because a few years ago the NSA had established a disinfo dept, that has been tasked to control the flow of information in the media and on the net [22]. Another phenomenon are the gatekeepers[23].

The Internet is predestined to spread propaganda and an powerful instrument to manipulate the opinions of the masses – fortunately there are options[24] to antagonize. From my point of view it is very important, that a user of a search engine doesn’t unlearn to independently assess and select information. It isn’t a lie, that similar incidents took place in the past – If we look back in history, there are several false flag[25] operations that attract our attention: Worth mentioning at this point is Operation Northwoods[26] where the Department of Defense in 1962 planned i.a. a staged explosion of a commercial aircraft across cuba, to blame the cubans and to set up a casus belli. As well as the coup of Salvador Allende in 1973 where is ample evidence, that the CIA was involved. Operation Northwoods was fortunately anticipated by President Kennedy.

Most recent NSA and CIA leaks reveal that intelligence agencies are often lacking any kind of qualms – Just as legislative passes the laws doesn’t apparently implicate that the executive – in context of an intelligence agency – has to obey these laws. How to successfully implement a plan for such a “terrorist“attack? Well, this is my theory: Establish a construct of unprecedented complexity and never give the whole plan to all parties involved (Need-to-know-principle). Pass the assignments and the instructions only selectively and in a minimalistic style to individual agents. Additionally conduct military exercises involving the wings and squadrons normally in charge of assuring the national air safety. Chain of commands and managerial structures should be kept as loosely and informal as possible, to provide plausible deniability if necessary – this teaches us a political doctrine existing since the 50s  – Targeted spreading of disinfo handles the rest.


Conclusion

A policy paper drafted in the year 2000 by a neocon think tank titled ’Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ states as follows:

„America’s military must rule out even the possibility of a serious global or regional challenger anywhere in the world. The regime of Saddam Hussein must be toppled immediately, by U.S. force if necessary. And the entire Middle East must be reordered according to an American plan. PNAC’s most important study notes that selling this plan to the American people will likely take a long time, "absent some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.“

How it is appointed about the ethical and psychological constitution of people designing such strategies and fulfil their political and geostrategical goals utilising machiavellian methods? It seems to be that a human life means nothing to them and they would do everything to advance their ways on the globe to keep the machinery of war in motion, otherwise no one achieves profit in this industry – False flag mass murder in this case seems to be the lesser of two evils.


"A time comes when silence is betrayal."
(Martin Luther King)



References

All of the sources refer to the electronic issue of the particular book. If an URL isn’t available anymore, the usage of the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org) is recommended.

[1] http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/afghan

[2] http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pSfuVriK1M&feature=youtu.be&t=168

[4] Building 7 appears with his 47 storeys relatively small, although it wasn’t hit by a plane, the
     collapse happened anyway. Architects and engineers substantiate with the scientific
     method that the collapse was characterised by free fall. This is – according the statements
     of the professionals – only possible, if all structural resistance has been removed before as
     the main steel girders were cut through previously.

[5] DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353279

[6] Hijacking Americas Mind on 9/11; ISBN 978-087-586-972-8; pp. 32 - 44

[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJAWl8unZeA

[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_KtLZ32-6U&feature=youtu.be&t=1570

[9] http://www.webcitation.org/6iG1SnFcX

[10] Hijacking Americas Mind on 9/11; ISBN 978-087-586-972-8; pp. 295 - 298

[11] http://www.webcitation.org/6iG2kZnUl

[12] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiG4vAOIhbA

[13] The death of money; ISBN 978-1-59184-741-0; Chapter 1, Section 'Trading in Plain Sight'

[14] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

[15] https://pastebin.com/GbW64zih

[16] http://www.webcitation.org/6iG1YB80h

[17] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhqHf2FzhO4

[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY

[19] http://www.webcitation.org/72BduQ7Uy

[20] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutungshoheit

[21] http://www.onstrat.com/osint

[22] http://www.webcitation.org/6iG1OJ1Om

[23] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-bHcfxO5y8

[24] https://www.yacy.net/en/Philosophy.html

[25] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

[26] http://www.webcitation.org/6iG2d2eQn