Both cant be true

Too anglo v not anglo enough (CF vs NRx)

Too tolerant of homos vs too prudish (CF,8chan,IM vs rational skeptics)

Not socialist enough vs too collectivist (CF, Natsoc types vs NRx and rational skeptics)

Too many women vs not enough women, you gay? (Manospher vs Renegade/IM types)

There are more. Only commonality is everything revolves around us

Fundamentally we will never actually please any and all. Especially with mistaken impressions, outright lies, and other failures of communication further muddying the waters. 8chan's polmeta actually claimed the altright was alt-lite civic nationalism and anti-natsoc. If anything that's the inversion of reality. Case in point: http://imgur.com/a/wkfjY

This is no more apparent than with Spencer. He used to be viewed as a dope and too moderate on key issues but since the end of 2016 corrected that for most. Many were impressed with him taking bolder stances, getting under people's skin more, and being generally more formidable than he was in debate/conversation. http://archive.is/rhrZo

When NPI ended everyone was singing his praises. When hailgate happened with the Atlantic video many cursed him, even going so far as to call him a plant. He held his ground. Which is what we wanted from conservatives btw.

Then Texas A&M made everyone like him again

Then getting suckerpunched was his own fault for some, though he took the wrenched fist quite well http://archive.is/XETVj