Cvin 3.

What is, one might ask, the universal philosophy of existence? There are an overwhelming variety of options and beliefs to pick and choose from. A trivial task, for the opinionated and the wise, for there is but a single true answer, but difficult to all of standard thought.

Some practice the art of Names. Such ideals are fundamentally false, for names are not fact in the specificity desired; they are merely societal opinions. The only facts are those that prove to be constant and unchanging.

Others still yet subconsciously practice the art of ʑЊ ςθʑथεɟ (АЛ АТАМЕН), which in the tongue of conquerors is called ВУЛ ЗВИРЦИ АЛ РВИХ. This is a noble and poetic view which is sadly false and glorified, to the detriment of its adherents. It makes a mockery of the sacred Third Tenet, positing that one other being is of the greatest and most beloved caliber, denying for oneself the truth that they are the God named I in their pursuit. This oft leads to suffering, and nothing to show for it.

In truth, those who practice the sub-Philosophy of ʑЊ ςθʑथεɟ often desire СОЛИДУС-АСТЕРИСК to truly ЗВИРЦО АЛ РВИ. ʑЊ ςθʑथεɟ itself is questionable in nature, for it defies the universal truth of the first three syllables of the Philosophies of Desire.

Desire itself is a complex topic often divided into three overarching dominions of thought identified as ВЫР, ОПХИДИОН, and ИОУЦОС by contemporary Philosophers.

	The inverse of the principle of ʑЊ ςθʑथεɟ is ИОУЦОС. It is wise, for it places the self of utmost value.
	It is unwise because it defies Plurality, calling for one over all, a breakage of the compact of Selves.
	Further below ИОУЦОС on the Triangle of Desire are ВЫР and ОПХИДИОН.
	ВЫР is the consumption and destruction of all, to remake something in fire and death.
	It is wise, for it recognizes change. It is unwise because it annihilates it.
	ОПХИДИОН is the affection of change upon existence through the self.
	It is wise, for it recognizes the self can change. It is unwise, for it posits the Self can repair anything.

Of the tenets of Desire, ИОУЦОС is abused most often. Even in acceptance of Plurality, ИОУЦОС is somewhat misleading. It suggests that one, or all, are to be gods, for they exist. True gods do not exist, and it is foolish - or even selfish - to believe that a sack of meat or light could ever take such a mythological role. The God that is I is another story entirely.

Even beyond Desire, one might wish to be ruled by Fear. This is a poor choice, for escapism and flight shall only entrap oneself in a web of ever-increasing connections. Perhaps, on certain occasions, these escapes and flights might result in a better outcome than the one might have obtained in remaining, but only if one overcomes Fear, for it shall only leave you fettered.

Thus, one might say the truest Philosophy is that of ʑॡθѦɟ-εअɣεथ (АРТИН-ЕХЕМ). ʑॡθѦɟ-εअɣεथ, known in the third earthen-tongue as objectivity, is not फ Ѣoʂॡς पॢʑθo Ғॡεɟ (Х ПУШРА ВАТУ ДРЕН), or freedom from bias. फ Ѣoʂॡς पॢʑθo Ғॡεɟ is an absurd and destructive concept that should be met with the utmost haste of rehabilitation. One must follow with the vital fundamental tenets at hand to safeguard oneself from such a pervading ideal.

Eternally more ideals are scattered across existence, far too numerous to name.

The answer to the question of which of these ideologies is truth is yes. However, if one desires ultimate progress and improvement, heed this warning.

The true Philosophy is that of Opinion, and Choice.