What type of web 2.0. backlinks is better to create?

What type of web 2.0. backlinks is better to create?
I started to create web 2.0. backlinks, but it goes very slowely (about 3 - 5 backlinks per day).
++++++++++++++
list of top cheapest host http://Listfreetop.pw

Top 200 best traffic exchange sites http://Listfreetop.pw

free link exchange sites list http://Listfreetop.pw
list of top ptc sites
list of top ptp sites
Listfreetop.pw
Listfreetop.pw
+++++++++++++++
On blog platforms like Blogger, Wordpress and Tumblr is easy to create 5 - 10 post mini-sites, because you only have to write the articles.
But on Wix, Weebly and Cabanova you have to change the original theme, and create all the pages yourself, and link somehow from the home page. This is much harder, and here I usually made a 1-2 page site.
Also on blog.fc2.com they deleted my site after a few days, claiming spam. I didn't make any spam, just a few articles, like on other web 2.0. sites.
I also tried with profile links on other web 2.0. sites, but most of these links are nofollow, or on noindex pages. I don't think profile links worth it in 2020, maybe only for diversity.
My question is, should I try to create more mini-sites on blog platforms, like blogger, wordpress and thumblr, (where these sites are easy to made), or I should create only one on every platform, to have diverse links, even if quality will be lower?
I started to create web 2.0. backlinks, but it goes very slowely (about 3 - 5 backlinks per day).
On blog platforms like Blogger, Wordpress and Tumblr is easy to create 5 - 10 post mini-sites, because you only have to write the articles.
But on Wix, Weebly and Cabanova you have to change the original theme, and create all the pages yourself, and link somehow from the home page. This is much harder, and here I usually made a 1-2 page site.
Also on blog.fc2.com they deleted my site after a few days, claiming spam. I didn't make any spam, just a few articles, like on other web 2.0. sites.
I also tried with profile links on other web 2.0. sites, but most of these links are nofollow, or on noindex pages. I don't think profile links worth it in 2020, maybe only for diversity.
My question is, should I try to create more mini-sites on blog platforms, like blogger, wordpress and thumblr, (where these sites are easy to made), or I should create only one on every platform, to have diverse links, even if quality will be lower?
Click to expand...
Also interested. Following thread to see what others have to say. My gut feel is that you should go with mini-sites. Looking to hear what the pros have to say.
You can make more then one link ob each site.
Just do all the time what you ar? doing...
5 links a day is 150 a month.
Think about links from forum posts and about profiles - from good authority sites are working.
I suggest you to write 4-5 posts on each web 2.0 and then post once in a while. You won't get much benefit by posting to same sites several times a week. If you link to your main site in each post, that may draw Google's attention too. So, either keep them simple or keep them realistic. Even if you make 1000 links on each web 2.0, one Google update could ruin months of hard work in a day. Focus on your main site, and develop links that seem to be relevant and authentic. So, to finally answer your question, build those links which stay in the long term.
I ever created web 2.0 which is our member can make post on their sub domain like blogspot/wordpress did. This run smooth arround 6months only, then google flagged my website as spam.
Actualy there is spam filter feature to determine duplicate post, spam profile page, etc. But this won't help, infact google still consider my web as spam.
i have already resubmit review to google but they did not answer for detail.
so far, in my opinion is to create public blog platform, I must have legal company and others document related to claim my company is follow the law from my country. Or they will flag your website as spam.
Note:
- My web is already shutdown at 2020 because i did not get any benefit since they flag our domain to "pure spam".
- I've learned that to create web 2.0 is not simpler than I thought.
- Sometimes I've thinking that google spam system is buggy or their still fail to implement their rules for wider concept of system technology in the future.
Man i have been doing almost the same as you but i'm using an automated process. Firstly, if you want to feed a web 2.0 network it will be pretty hard if you dont have some kind of auto generated content (spun or scrambled).
Secondly, work with platforms that make it easier for you, not harder. If i get a ban from a platform, i can try maybe 1 or 2 more times. If i get banned again i just forget it. Also check if the platform is getting indexed by google (site:someplatform.com) - check last 24h results, see what kind of content ppl are indexing. If a lot of shit is indexing, then its a good sign.
Third and last thing that i noticed in my experience was consistency. You see, these webs 2.0 are very weak, specially when u use spam content. So obviously, 2-3 links per day wont move the needle. What i do is start slow, post 3 times per week and then start posting everyday. Again this will be hard without automation.... and also getting a indexer service helps, because many links will be "discarded" by google, so yeah you have to "shoot everywhere" and see if whatever hits. Building a tier 2 layer also helps.
"My question is, should I try to create more mini-sites on blog platforms, like blogger, wordpress and thumblr, (where these sites are easy to made), or I should create only one on every platform, to have diverse links, even if quality will be lower?"
-> Create as many sites as you want on the platforms that work for you. Keep feeding the network, dont just post 10-20 articles and forget the site. If you created 20 posts and only 2-5 indexed you wasted a lot of f'ing time. Avoid overly complicated platforms, in the long run you will probably get tired of them.
Just my 2 cents. Good luck!
I started to create web 2.0. backlinks, but it goes very slowely (about 3 - 5 backlinks per day).
On blog platforms like Blogger, Wordpress and Tumblr is easy to create 5 - 10 post mini-sites, because you only have to write the articles.
But on Wix, Weebly and Cabanova you have to change the original theme, and create all the pages yourself, and link somehow from the home page. This is much harder, and here I usually made a 1-2 page site.
Also on blog.fc2.com they deleted my site after a few days, claiming spam. I didn't make any spam, just a few articles, like on other web 2.0. sites.
I also tried with profile links on other web 2.0. sites, but most of these links are nofollow, or on noindex pages. I don't think profile links worth it in 2020, maybe only for diversity.
My question is, should I try to create more mini-sites on blog platforms, like blogger, wordpress and thumblr, (where these sites are easy to made), or I should create only one on every platform, to have diverse links, even if quality will be lower?
Click to expand...
The answers will be subjective.
My opinionated answer: Go with the ones where (1) you can create content with minimal friction and (2) your content stays for a long time.
don't be affraid of linking
just think what you are doing and keep doing it!
if you won't make links - you won't rank at all
and in fact you need to think about automation of your process otherwise you will loss a lot of time (if we talk about 2.0)
you have nice tools as: turbo web 2.0 (they re updating it), zennoposter (very good tool!), gsa with addon or just magicsubmitter (nice tool but not so auto)
just do it faster, don't use schema (text for ex.) and if you want to be smart - use scrapebox and find expired 2.0s to register them
thats all :)
vps9.net
moihanan.blogspot.co.at
hosting a community forum
goeasyearn.com
imgdino.com
i'm hosting a younique party
host 360 photos