Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-11 0315 +Controlled Opposition

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-11 0315 +Controlled Opposition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPjmWOWq97k&google_comment_id=z13mg50pwlbft1ame22btpawetqovbbhd04
https://pastebin.com/8XeURc5p
__

+Controlled Opposition __ And by the same token something can seem likely yet be impossible. Dark clouds can gather and threaten to storm convincing the little people below to take in their washing - unbeknownst that laziness can prevail because weather conditions have made the storm impossible.



You cannot have certainty unless you were directly involved. Only "Rodney Sumter" really knows if he got shot or not.



That you find him convincing means only you find him convincing.



As unlikely as it may be it is not impossible (though it is admittedly fantastical) he was shot afterwards in a controlled way so as to be able to provide evidence for a genuine wound.



Such a controlled wound would be consistent with his apparent "good luck" at not suffering any worse damage. >> *I am of course NOT asserting that is what happened*. <<



I am merely pointing out that you do not have certainty. *What you have is a strong feeling that your belief is a true belief*. But without sufficient proof your belief - _*however true it may be*_ - remains an *unjustified belief*.



Although unjustified beliefs are not necessarily dangerous it is incredibly dangerous for your mental health to mistake unjustified belief as justified.



A justified belief forms only after witnessing sufficient proof. Sufficient proof is withheld from lie system events and claims (like a kind of censorship). Having the audience form unjustified beliefs is the consequence of this magic trick. In magic this is called the "effect".



Justified or unjustified - each belief that you accept as true goes into your mind and shapes your perceptions and expectations about reality.



When your beliefs are true and justified then you can form true perceptions about reality. When your beliefs are true but not justified then you are vulnerable to forming false perceptions of reality.



Let's suppose that *every* mass shooting is really a "hoax". If you believe they are real then when the next fake shooting is reported - you're going to continue believing it is real. Because it will conform to a pattern you accept as meaning it is real - even though it isn't.



In the same way - if each mass shooting is genuine - but is reported in a form that's doubtable by intelligent people - then should a need ever arise for a fake shooting it will go into the audience's reality as real.



Because it will conform to the same pattern that has hitherto been accepted as genuine.



When truth is presented to the audience in the same form a lie would need to take (i.e., without sufficient proof) then when a lie is presented as truth the audience will not be able to recognise the deceit.



_It is simply the effect of the magic trick._



If you want to argue against me then you need to argue that we don't really live in a lie system that's intentionally and systematically withholding sufficient proof. _That's what I am all about._



I am not one of those "hoaxtards" or "realtards" who is stuck in that planned dichotomy. I am instead someone who is able to appreciate the great big magic show.



__



Each event on its own doesn't matter. Maybe it happened - maybe it didn't. It doesn't matter that you believe it did. What matters to the lie system is that you have reacted and convinced yourself it was true.



What matters to the lie system is that you have accepted proof's appearances in place of actual proof.



What matters to the lie system is that the event was sufficiently fascinating that you paid attention to it - thereby allowing its wicked suggestions to be repeated into your reality.



What matters to the lie system is that you accepted its event as true - and so it'll be a little bit easier for you to accept the next one as true.



If there is some food you love to eat every single day you may not notice that bit by bit the taste is being changed. What you are now eating may taste like sh!t had you tasted it from the outset. But you have been led - incrementally - to now love that sh!tty taste.



__



When we live in a world where groups of people would drop atomic bombs on large numbers of innocent men, women and children - all for the "greater good" - we must be mindful that lying to large numbers of men, women and children - _also for the "greater good"_ - is not ever going to be an option that's taken off the table.



It can happen at any time.



And so we must not give such groups of people any free passes.



If we are not being presented with sufficient proof - when sufficient proof can exist and reasonably be seen - we should not get involved. (Other than to point out its absence and make others aware of the magic trick.)



Even if sufficient proof for the alleged "Orlando Shooting" were *ultimately* provided - the damage has already been done. Why? Because it's all about first impressions. Most people formed their belief (an unjustified belief) when the event first happened.



Their first impressions were not of seeing sufficient proof but of accepting proof's appearances in its place. (Regardless as to however real the event may have been.)



In the absence of sufficient proof we are justified in doubting the claim - _even if it happened._ >> *And in a lie system we are always negligent if we don't*. <<

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.