Super Sargon's Debate Lifehacks

Sargon's Fashy Psyop Tip >:)
"How to argue with women/dumb hoes/homosexuals and get them to cede moral authority to you without realizing it"

I've been trying a very weird approach IRL lately in that it's specifically "poor me" in appearence but ends up with the other person trying to morally justify themselves.

Basically you grant them all their moral condemnations regarding evil nahtzees but on some vague non defined group, then establish that you're super anti-bigotry and just concerned for kids and single mothers of all races. Then you make sure that you're on the same page as the person and just hate how diversity makes kids who are white or black or chinese start to hate each other and even bully each other (gasp, I know)..

I've found literally doing a thought experiment about how it must be so hard for a hispanic american in school to understand why some white kids are saying mean things to him. You can even say something about how while it would be wrong to be racist against the white kids, you could see yourself as growing up kind of racist from that point forward against the white kids, maybe even acting out against one or two of the dumb evil WHITE racists

Pretty much anybody is going to eat this up unironically, which is kind of funny, because then you whiplash everything by continuing the hypothetical: Yeah, obviously the hispanic kid would be kind of reacting poorly to the racist kids if he beat them up, but it's understandable and it's hard to feel sorry for the kids. The worst part about it is how some uninvolved white kids will probably hear about it and then become paranoid and even racist or anti-hispanic. And while most will never act on it, that confusion can breed hate if it's not addressed in a loving manner.

So now you have the morally good hispanic kid, the ebil white racist kids, and the morally grey white kid who are confused. Here's where the whole "poor me" thing is crazy, the hispanic kid and the white kids have just been set up as
[victim who reacts poorly] and [stupid kids and get punished so also victims]
and the third thought experiment symbol (confused white kid who is going down a bad path) is now a morally demanding character for the person you're talking with. Here's what you do at this point:

Point out that the kid becoming rayciss is vewwy vewwy bad and undesirable, but also point out that if he does become racist it will be because of the violence that happened to the racist white kids (who were guilty of original sin for no reason lmao) by the hispanic kid.
It's extremely important to stress that ofc you're not blaming the hispanic kid for acting that way, but to the confused naive white kid not aware of da ebil of unironic nazis skinheads, they will think the hispanic kid was being racist. This makes person you're talking to view the hispanic kid as a victim with some understandable blame, the blob of white kids as nondescript bad actors (you can attribute some negative characteristics like the kids are spoiled rich kids lol), and the confused white kid with budding racist thoughts as a sympathetic potential victim

Now you take all your affirmations of goodwill and saintly desires for world-peace and worries that you established in the beginning (that they will be agreeing with and approving of because you explaining it to them infers you think they're morally superior to you in that way, which means the more you stress how perfectly empathetic you are, the more they will feel good about themselves. lmao it's bizarre I know, but whatever)


You take that barely hidden [RETARDED_SELF_LOVE] and link it to a potential outcome for the fake white kid who's confused.
"I was lucky not to deal with my confusion by turning hateful, but that's only because I was able to talk it out and any silly ideas I had were addressed and I saw what was wrong" or something like that.

Then you link the bad racist blob of kids to the other potential outcome, saying you're glad you were lucky enough to have good people to talk to etc etc but if you didn't you could see yourself ending up in the dumdumb blank-slate blob of raycism.


Now without ever tripping the feminine psyche desire to always be ingroup you've done the following:

Turned hispanic victim of bullying into morally neutral kid who isn't bad but isn't some moral authority
Turned random white kid into a symbol with a SAINT/SATAN outcome dependant on the person you're talking to
Turned the SATAN group of white kids into kids who must not have had anybody looking after them and talking with them


From that, you then can say after talking with [XYZ_BAD_GROUP] you found that most of the people are like that confused and hurting kid in the example, and then link viewing them uncharitably to viewing your currently saintly core aspirations (which are like a mirror of your conversation partner's somehow lmao wuuuuut) as evil, which hurts and makes you sad because you obviously aren't hurtful or evil.

And from there you can explain that multiculti causes needless hate between innocent kids of all races, treating kids like monsters just pushes them in bad directions that are unhealthy for everybody, and that what people see as "racism" or "sexism" is usually just miscommunication (it usually helps to frame it almost like people seen as racist are retarded because being "disabled" makes it a moral imperative to listen to and an unfathomable evil to malign retards or push them into bad habits like drug use or saying nigger lmao)

That's it, pip pip cheerio
- Sargon of Akkad