API tools faq
paste
Lesta

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 2100 PUBLIC

Lesta
Feb 13th, 2016
76
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.13 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 2100 PUBLIC
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/K3QxuGqTkPc
  3. https://pastebin.com/8Wid4BNT
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. You'd think the military would be quite skilled with filmmaking and video editing since we are led to believe that "propaganda" is central to every war effort ("truth is the first casualty of war" and so on).
  8.  
  9.  
  10. If the "ISS" footage is being faked then these "masking glitches" are essential in order to mask the clever stitching of multiple pieces of footage. Despite what many people may think - no one has ever seen "sufficient proof" for the "ISS". Sufficient proof is not impossible and could be created in the next 15 minutes by "NASA" if they wanted [and could].
  11.  
  12.  
  13. Sufficient proof is that which answers the question "what do I need to see in order to know with certainty that an event or claim is genuine?". I.e., what necessarily proves an event or claim is real. What can we see to know with certainty that there is a real and manned micro/zero gravity research facility? Sufficient proof for the alleged "ISS" would be sustained duration genuine zero gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.
  14.  
  15.  
  16. Where briefer duration clips are needed to be stitched together the "masking glitches" become a requirement and must be "artificially induced". It is therefore sensible that they would be made to appear similar to "common glitches" such as we might find during so-called "satellite broadcast" or "video compression" artifacts. Anyone watching (especially children) will instinctively dismiss these obvious glitches as "normal" and not think of them as important.
  17.  
  18.  
  19. There are a few reasons. A main reason is that "experts" aren't calling the "ISS" fake because of the glitches. "Therefore they must be natural!" In the case of children it would be that their teacher does not say anything as they watch the purported "ISS" interviews. The other reason - which is more so the case for adults (and those teachers) is that since the person believes the "ISS" is real then those glitches *must* have a natural explanation. But since the masking glitches are intentional and artificial they may be similar but not quite sufficiently resemble "the real thing" (a real "glitch").
  20.  
  21.  
  22. If you look for "known good" examples you can find some similar looking artifacts but it is never quite the same thing. Whereas when it comes to purported "ISS" interview footage we consistently see the same kind of "glitch". I can show you dozens and dozens of these glitches - always the same with minimal variation. If the glitch had a "natural explanation" then we would expect to see the same thing happening during "known good footage". But we don't. When genuine glitches are examined there are always features about them which rule them out as being responsible.
  23.  
  24.  
  25. The other aspect which most people seem oblivious to (and cannot seem to grasp) is that these glitches make it possible to doubt the "ISS" in the first place. That is tremendously significant. The lie system presents us with footage of events and claims that are at all times "doubtable". It is therefore possible to call "everything a hoax" but instinctively we know that cannot be true. We know - for example - that "natural disasters" do happen. And so someone calling a "natural disaster" a "hoax" seems overly paranoid and bizarre. But it makes perfect sense when you realise that the person calling it "fake" is simply noticing that the footage (i.e., "evidence") does not stand up to scrutiny.
  26.  
  27.  
  28. The only mistake being made by so-called "auto-hoaxers" is that "the absence of sufficient proof does not mean the event or claim did not happen". Rather - it just means we are justified in doubting it. In fact - in a lie system - we should vigorously doubt everything that we are not given sufficient proof for (when it is reasonable to expect it). Another issue is that people rush to make a decision (to believe or to reject) as soon as possible. There's no reason why we shouldn't wait a few months until after an event or claim and then casually look back over it. The lie system wants us to believe (or reject) as soon as possible.
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Given that each lie system event or claim can always be doubted (whereas we cannot doubt who won last year's Wimbledon tennis final!) then for a person to believe an event or claim they must suppress any doubt that arises. People who believe despite good reasons to doubt have founded and formed their belief on trust and proof's appearances. *This has been happening to all of us since birth and by the time we are adults we are very skilled at suppressing doubt.* Especially when we *want* to believe something. Most people *want* to believe they live in a world where there is a real and manned zero gravity research facility and certainly don't want to believe they live in a world that would lie about such a thing! We have simply trained ourselves to accept what we are seeing as genuine by tacitly ignoring each doubtable moment. We train ourselves to accept and believe things based on trust and proof's appearances (or mistaking proof's appearances as proof).
  32.  
  33.  
  34. Because so many people are unaware of this "lie system strategy" we find "ISS advocates" crying out: "But why would anyone lie?!"; "Why bother?!" "Too many people are involved - it must be real!" and so on. It may well be true but their belief is not justified - and that is what's dangerous. They are seemingly oblivious to this large and broad strategy that is continually playing out.
  35.  
  36.  
  37. If something is at all times doubtable but yet is accepted as true then that person has effectively chosen to believe and is immersed in the lie system. Powerless to resist. Through this and a few other core strategies the lie system can cause entire populations to believe effectively anything. Whether it be about an alien invasion or a later excursion to Mars - those who are immersed in the lie system ("fascinated by it") are rendered powerless to doubt.
  38.  
  39.  
  40. If a "truther" is not aware of this strategy and they reject some events as "fake" but accept other events as "real" then it is always arbitrary. They are picking and choosing according to their own personal biases. They believe what they want to believe. Whereas the general population (i.e., "normal people") believe everything reported on the nightly news - we have "truthers" who are different in that they are able to reject some events - but really they are no more enlightened. Every lie system event and claim is doubtable and a "truther" is someone who arbitrarily accepts some as real and some as fake. But always in accordance to their belief bias.
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44. __________________________________________
  45. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  46. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  47.  
  48. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  49. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  50.  
  51. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  52. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  53.  
  54. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  55. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!