BTC's match 2:

Embrace Point 1:

* My team strong.

* Your team weak.

* Win con #1 is Rasengan due to its high damage with minor emphasis placed upon knives, bombs and clones.

* Win con #2 is Hank's spikes. They are many in number and come from surprise angles.

* Win con #3 is Zombieman's Deagles which are facilitated by the distractions upon clones.

Summary: Embrace makes a good start with a tried and true method of establishing her own stats and arguing how these translate into superior ability then tying into how these translate into win conditions.

Abe Point 1

* Stealth + Piercing resistance = I win.

Summary: Did you mean to make this longer Abe? You have three characters to use. THREE. Why are you only arguing a win-condition for one of them?

Embrace Point 2:

* Arena is not good for stealth.

* Abe's feats aren't as good as he is presenting them.

* Artemis has no speed.

* My characters DO have piercing resistance either through toughing it out, actual feats, or regeneration.

Summary: The rebuttals offered here are effective in context of this debate. The added train of events is also nice, as it serves as a function of evolving Embrace's points about her earlier win conditions.


Abe Point 2:

* Contesting the points about whether or not its well lit.

* Naruto's piercing isn't as good as presented.

* I have damage over time.

Summary: While I think the point about the arena being 'well lit' is definitely an over exaggeration on Embrace's part, it is not exactly poorly lit enough to consider it a major flaw in her argumentation. The Naruto scan is absolutely garbage as I have zero idea about the context of how that even took place from just a glance. And while there's nothing wrong with Abe's points about the claw, the life force argument could have been done better than asking your opponent to explicitly prove that they don't have one, though this is an argument that could span paragraphs on its own. My greatest criticism here comes to light. Abe. You got 25000 characters to work with. These 1 paragraph responses have no capacity to fully entail all the things you NEED to actually be saying.

Embrace Point 3:

* All your win cons are based off 'ifs' or situations that are highly suspect.

Summary: My only criticism is when you give one word responses like "no" to aspects of your opponent's argumentation. When your opponent says something wrong, that is usually the perfect time to accentuate their errors, but given you're in the lead, I guess its not necessary.

Abe Point 3:

* My opponent's speed is fake.

* Clones weaken Naruto.

* Zombieman's OOT

* Entrei solos

Summary: Okay. While there *is* a way possible to attack the speed feats of the scroll scan, what you did certainly wasn't the way to do it. The point mentioned about the clones isn't bad, but the Zombieman argumentation is kinda 'what'. Reaction speeds alone don't make you OOT unless stacked with some substantial speed or power that actually augments their ability to become stronger. I guess the Enteri feat is *fine* but there are still ways to disassemble it.

Conclusion: Embrace had win conditions that were better, more numerous, and the comparatively tiny amount of mistakes she makes compared to Abe weren't properly capitalized at all. Embrace wins.