National Identity v. supremacy ideology

1. I think Western, liberal countries should have a national identity
brevik has joined (~bogota@2001:470:1f2a:c8::e535:e85b)
Monfd
2. That national identity is not based off your religion, or your skin color, or any physical trait, but rather by the belief that a modern, liberal republic is a good form of government for allowing lots of people to live together productively
12:49 nancy- has joined ([email protected])
Monfd
3. Western, liberal countries should not admit large amounts of people that do not fit that national identity
Monfd
4. More than 50% of Muslims in the world, according to various polls, do not fit that national identity
12:50 Monfd
4. About 30% of American Christians do not fit that identity
Monfd
6. Abrahamic religions are fundamentally opposed to the modern, liberal republican identity of the West
Melmoth
Easymoney: she's everything a woman should be
BBCPLS
not bad, but kind of ended life
Monfd
7. White supremacists like the New Zealand shooter, Donald Trump, the GOP, and the international white supremacy movement recognize some of the problem the above 6-points reveal
Monfd
8. Tribal/clan/religious supremacist systems are anathema to the modern, liberal, republican identity
Monfd
9. This includes white supremacy, of course
Monfd
10. There are more white supremacists in our modern, liberal, republican countries than there are Muslim supremacists, and they also wield a disproportionate power
Monfd
11. Our governments should seriously work against the rise of supremacist ideologies that fundamentally oppose the republican vision described by James Madison in Federalist 10, and the current biggest threat to that is white supremacy