Advertisement
Piexplode

Untitled

Jun 28th, 2020
91
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.88 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Disaster AreaToday at 22:27
  2. what did you think of my play anyway was it ok :joy:
  3. always aiming to be better
  4. even tho i won 2-0 vs a decent opponent when i got froze early both games
  5. still
  6. RaishToday at 22:28
  7. Yeah pareto optimal play as far as i can tell
  8. Disaster AreaToday at 22:28
  9. :grin:
  10. RaishToday at 22:29
  11. The major moments I would have made a different play, yours achieved similar results usually
  12. There was 1 series that resulted in a net loss while trying to save a mon
  13. And out you back in the same spot down resources
  14. +but there was a chance for it to work
  15. Disaster AreaToday at 22:30
  16. what spot was that
  17. RaishToday at 22:34
  18. actually wasnt pure loss
  19. you lost low health zam
  20. in exchange for opportunity to boom lax for benefit
  21. but putting in zam straight after kill rather than tauros
  22. cost you the zm
  23. zam
  24. turn 39
  25. like why did you play tauros there
  26. rather than zam
  27. Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
  28. well i didnt need para on chansey but hmm
  29. yeah maybe zam was the play idk
  30. RaishToday at 22:38
  31. yeah it could heal up vs chansey
  32. if you would switch to zam on chansey anyway
  33. Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
  34. could stoss vs egg psychic vs tauros and attack vs chans too
  35. mm
  36. RaishToday at 22:38
  37. or attack either way
  38. Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
  39. yeah i think youre right
  40. that it was a misplay
  41. RaishToday at 22:38
  42. but yeah just that 1 choice was outclassed in teh whole game
  43. would tauros have stayed in vs eggy?
  44. prbably not
  45. and vs tauros, if you're going to beam, zam still better. only better if you're going to slam
  46. to avoid switch
  47. unless they don't switch beam out of fear
  48. but unneeded risk on that play
  49. although high reward
  50. Disaster AreaToday at 22:43
  51. for what its worth
  52. part of my thinking with the zam switch
  53. was that it was a roll for chans to KO there too
  54. but well
  55. RaishToday at 22:44
  56. ah ok I didnt know dmg
  57. Disaster AreaToday at 22:44
  58. hm i was thinking
  59. if i went vic and he went tauros
  60. then thats not great i go zam sack there then bring in my own tauros and slam but he can go egg then i dont have fodder
  61. if he goes chans or egg i can at least bring in zam to sack and force the matchup i want
  62. RaishToday at 22:44
  63. yeah vic had a losing outplay
  64. Disaster AreaToday at 22:44
  65. so maybe it was zam not tauros
  66. since zam vs tauros is also fine
  67. RaishToday at 22:45
  68. yeah he gets an easier switch out but you get some tempo
  69. if you spec fall chansey guaranteed heal
  70. Disaster AreaToday at 22:45
  71. yup
  72. RaishToday at 22:45
  73. even through traded paras
  74. Disaster AreaToday at 22:45
  75. well
  76. i wouldnt be paraing chansey w zam
  77. even if i could
  78. RaishToday at 22:46
  79. oops yeah
  80. lol
  81. not in that situ
  82. Disaster AreaToday at 22:46
  83. i mean yeah like really all i can do is spam psychic and recover
  84. RaishToday at 22:46
  85. yeah but that's still relevant
  86. Disaster AreaToday at 22:46
  87. but realistically zam can die without chans being at full most of the time which is all it really wants but
  88. if chans is at full and then he switches in tauros on a recover / anticipated recover + I FP
  89. then that's bad
  90. cos then even after i get to retaliate w tauros
  91. he can still have his own tauros + egg to beat me with
  92. like sack chans then go egg and land sleep powder
  93. and then i lose
  94. RaishToday at 22:48
  95. so you're saying 86 vs 100 is very meaningful?
  96. for chans
  97. Disaster AreaToday at 22:48
  98. hmm
  99. actually i guess not so much but
  100. so with zam i really just needed
  101. it to actually die to chansey
  102. and not let tauros in
  103. RaishToday at 22:48
  104. yeah die on a turn you psychic
  105. Disaster AreaToday at 22:48
  106. if tauros comes in
  107. then i lose more often than not
  108. cos then i cant bring vic back in im forced tauros
  109. RaishToday at 22:49
  110. but up 100% to 43
  111. you can double slam
  112. oh but then vic has trouble
  113. yeah
  114. but still same situation presented as here actually
  115. basically he misplayed by killing zam
  116. Disaster AreaToday at 22:50
  117. yup
  118. RaishToday at 22:50
  119. so the play could have been good mental bait
  120. cuz it made him take that opportunity to let vic in
  121. but
  122. if he realized that, could tried to either set up a para or freeze for tauros switch
  123. and still starting zam vs switching it in are similar
  124. so yeah vs a perfect player your play was suboptimal
  125. but vs a human it baited him giving you the tempo you needed to finish
  126. Disaster AreaToday at 22:53
  127. well
  128. im not sure actually
  129. if maybe tauros is right
  130. cos if i have tauros vs tauros
  131. at least its actually painful for him to switch
  132. RaishToday at 22:53
  133. if he switches egg into noncrit beam you lose
  134. Disaster AreaToday at 22:53
  135. whereas w zam we just end up where i ended up
  136. well
  137. no i can just bslam
  138. RaishToday at 22:54
  139. yeah
  140. Disaster AreaToday at 22:54
  141. i live slam slam beam
  142. its just a question of if he goes desperation move
  143. but if i have tauros vs tauros
  144. RaishToday at 22:54
  145. I mentioned that before haha as the only good situation out of his 3 options
  146. Disaster AreaToday at 22:54
  147. i bslam
  148. RaishToday at 22:54
  149. so yeah not strict misplay because more pressure in 1/3 cases
  150. and because in action baited him
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement