Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:27
- what did you think of my play anyway was it ok :joy:
- always aiming to be better
- even tho i won 2-0 vs a decent opponent when i got froze early both games
- still
- RaishToday at 22:28
- Yeah pareto optimal play as far as i can tell
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:28
- :grin:
- RaishToday at 22:29
- The major moments I would have made a different play, yours achieved similar results usually
- There was 1 series that resulted in a net loss while trying to save a mon
- And out you back in the same spot down resources
- +but there was a chance for it to work
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:30
- what spot was that
- RaishToday at 22:34
- actually wasnt pure loss
- you lost low health zam
- in exchange for opportunity to boom lax for benefit
- but putting in zam straight after kill rather than tauros
- cost you the zm
- zam
- turn 39
- like why did you play tauros there
- rather than zam
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
- well i didnt need para on chansey but hmm
- yeah maybe zam was the play idk
- RaishToday at 22:38
- yeah it could heal up vs chansey
- if you would switch to zam on chansey anyway
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
- could stoss vs egg psychic vs tauros and attack vs chans too
- mm
- RaishToday at 22:38
- or attack either way
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:38
- yeah i think youre right
- that it was a misplay
- RaishToday at 22:38
- but yeah just that 1 choice was outclassed in teh whole game
- would tauros have stayed in vs eggy?
- prbably not
- and vs tauros, if you're going to beam, zam still better. only better if you're going to slam
- to avoid switch
- unless they don't switch beam out of fear
- but unneeded risk on that play
- although high reward
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:43
- for what its worth
- part of my thinking with the zam switch
- was that it was a roll for chans to KO there too
- but well
- RaishToday at 22:44
- ah ok I didnt know dmg
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:44
- hm i was thinking
- if i went vic and he went tauros
- then thats not great i go zam sack there then bring in my own tauros and slam but he can go egg then i dont have fodder
- if he goes chans or egg i can at least bring in zam to sack and force the matchup i want
- RaishToday at 22:44
- yeah vic had a losing outplay
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:44
- so maybe it was zam not tauros
- since zam vs tauros is also fine
- RaishToday at 22:45
- yeah he gets an easier switch out but you get some tempo
- if you spec fall chansey guaranteed heal
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:45
- yup
- RaishToday at 22:45
- even through traded paras
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:45
- well
- i wouldnt be paraing chansey w zam
- even if i could
- RaishToday at 22:46
- oops yeah
- lol
- not in that situ
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:46
- i mean yeah like really all i can do is spam psychic and recover
- RaishToday at 22:46
- yeah but that's still relevant
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:46
- but realistically zam can die without chans being at full most of the time which is all it really wants but
- if chans is at full and then he switches in tauros on a recover / anticipated recover + I FP
- then that's bad
- cos then even after i get to retaliate w tauros
- he can still have his own tauros + egg to beat me with
- like sack chans then go egg and land sleep powder
- and then i lose
- RaishToday at 22:48
- so you're saying 86 vs 100 is very meaningful?
- for chans
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:48
- hmm
- actually i guess not so much but
- so with zam i really just needed
- it to actually die to chansey
- and not let tauros in
- RaishToday at 22:48
- yeah die on a turn you psychic
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:48
- if tauros comes in
- then i lose more often than not
- cos then i cant bring vic back in im forced tauros
- RaishToday at 22:49
- but up 100% to 43
- you can double slam
- oh but then vic has trouble
- yeah
- but still same situation presented as here actually
- basically he misplayed by killing zam
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:50
- yup
- RaishToday at 22:50
- so the play could have been good mental bait
- cuz it made him take that opportunity to let vic in
- but
- if he realized that, could tried to either set up a para or freeze for tauros switch
- and still starting zam vs switching it in are similar
- so yeah vs a perfect player your play was suboptimal
- but vs a human it baited him giving you the tempo you needed to finish
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:53
- well
- im not sure actually
- if maybe tauros is right
- cos if i have tauros vs tauros
- at least its actually painful for him to switch
- RaishToday at 22:53
- if he switches egg into noncrit beam you lose
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:53
- whereas w zam we just end up where i ended up
- well
- no i can just bslam
- RaishToday at 22:54
- yeah
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:54
- i live slam slam beam
- its just a question of if he goes desperation move
- but if i have tauros vs tauros
- RaishToday at 22:54
- I mentioned that before haha as the only good situation out of his 3 options
- Disaster AreaToday at 22:54
- i bslam
- RaishToday at 22:54
- so yeah not strict misplay because more pressure in 1/3 cases
- and because in action baited him
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement