Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-17 1520 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-17 1520 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/S6YaWH82Prv
https://pastebin.com/7XN24K59
__


+nationalparksign __ I think that "sufficient proof" is a *very simple* concept but it really doesn't seem to be understood by "stupid" people.



It's like a kind of "IQ" or "perception" test. You either "see the answer immediately" or you will stare at it forever and not ever "get it".



Perhaps it can be thought of as a kind of "biobot/NPC" test. If it is explained to someone - and that person carries on as before (unaffected by it) - then they are not really "there"/"present".



Just a "physical form" that is "going about the motions".



They're more of a "dream character" rather than a "dreamer".



Then again - maybe I am not explaining it properly.


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w