Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [18:36:28] <l3M3w> Question.. is it better for a child to sit in a foster agency till he/she is 18, or get adopted by a loving gay couple?
- [18:37:52] <mime> That is a false dichotomy, i.e. no third option.
- [18:38:36] <mime> It is obviously best for the child to be adopted by a heterosexual, married couple.
- [18:38:57] <l3M3w> then my question will be, what is second best? :)
- [18:38:58] chariot (~androirc@77.19.249.105.tmi.telenormobil.no) left IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
- [18:39:40] <mime> That is a very biased and not at all neutral question, l3M3w.
- [18:39:50] <Zardoz> living with Honey Boo Boo
- [18:40:13] <l3M3w> hey mime
- [18:40:22] <l3M3w> I want to introduce you to a friend of mine.. Gregg Homme
- [18:40:45] Jeff_ (~p32@mtrlpq4709w-lp140-01-70-30-220-150.dsl.bell.ca) joined the channel
- [18:41:52] <mime> It is problematic when some are trying to fool others by biased and fallacious questions and statements.
- [18:42:19] <l3M3w> no it was a valid question
- [18:42:42] <l3M3w> because the fact remians that children do remain in foster care until 18...
- [18:42:59] <l3M3w> so the choice of every foster child being adopted by hetrosexual couples does not exist
- [18:43:25] <ELQEYNN> like when their foster parents get divorced?
- [18:43:57] <l3M3w> i meant.. in group homes...
- [18:44:04] <l3M3w> rather...
- [18:46:15] <mime> One could ask: what is best for an orphan - being taken care of by godly parents, or ungodly parents? The answer is obvious.
- [18:47:13] Jozez` (~atdotcom@joses.users.undernet.org) left IRC (EOF from client)
- [18:47:27] Jozez` (~atdotcom@71.82.188.99) joined the channel
- [18:47:39] Jozez` (~atdotcom@71.82.188.99) left IRC (Registered)
- [18:47:39] Jozez` (~atdotcom@joses.users.undernet.org) joined the channel
- [18:51:03] <mime> Some atheists and other ungodly people might of course argue the opposite case, especially at a mere level of thoughts as when putting up a false dichotomy. Such false dilemmas can easily be made by saying; is it better to be raised by alcoholics, or homosexuals, who according to the Bible are perverts. It is obviously best for the child to be raised by two, loving heterosexual, married people.
- [18:53:07] <mime> Such false dilemmas often rests, as we see in this case, upon the notion of the lesser evil. But that is, a false dichotomy.
- [18:53:22] nhscott (~nhscott2@ama-wldhcp.696135107.amaonline.com) joined the channel
- [18:54:14] <l3M3w> Better it focus on reality
- [18:54:19] <l3M3w> not some 'evils'
- [18:56:10] nhscott (~nhscott2@ama-wldhcp.696135107.amaonline.com) left IRC (Read error: EOF from client)
- [18:56:34] <mime> According to reality, nature herself ordains the frameworks of how children are made and thus also who can make it, and under which circumstances. Producing children, is an ability only two people of different genders could attain.
- [18:57:27] <mime> I can thus not see, as l3M3w argues, that homosexual perverts should be an lesser evil for a child, than being raised by two, heterosexual, married people.
- [18:58:06] <l3M3w> but the fact that unadopted chldren DO exist, is clearly reason that only hetrosexuals should adopt
- [18:58:29] <mime> The fact that unadopted children exist, do not say anything about the fact of who should or should not adopt children.
- [18:59:22] Rohalilalala (~Roha@80-42-213-226.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) joined the channel
- [18:59:24] <mime> You should read Aristeles books about rhetorics, for its important how you formulate an argument. Yes, it actually dictates the whole argument.
- [18:59:44] Toph (~Peace@208.94.197.142) joined the channel
- [19:00:09] X sets mode +l 32
- [19:00:42] <mime> The mere fact that unadopted children exist, do not say anything about who should or should not adopted them. Murderers, criminals, homosexuals etc. No, the fact that unadopted children exist, merely says that unadopted children exist.
- [19:01:34] <l3M3w> but being homosexual is not a crime though
- [19:01:40] <l3M3w> so nice failed logic on your behalf
- [19:01:57] <mime> Being homosexual is not only a crime, but a very serious and sinful crime.
- [19:02:17] <l3M3w> where in the us statutes is it a crime?
- [19:02:37] <mime> That something is not illegal by codified, secular law, do not make a given behavior good or virtues. No, in primitive society many behaviors are not regulated by law, and they yet remain sinful, criminal and amoral behaviors.
- [19:02:54] <l3M3w> again
- [19:02:58] <l3M3w> your logic is flawed
- [19:03:04] <mime> No, your argument is.
- [19:03:09] <l3M3w> have a good day... you are just not worth the wasted bandwidth
- [19:03:56] <mime> The fact that it is OK to beat a child in certain parts of the U.S.A., do not make this behavior good and moral. Most leftists understand that, so it shouldnt be too much of a problem to understand the difference between codified, secular law, and actual morality.
- [19:04:00] Mouser wonders when Jesus sat and ate with the publicans and sinners, if homosexuals were present... I wonder if he called them out, and beat them with a sledgehammer?
- [19:05:22] Rohalilalala (~Roha@80-42-213-226.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) left IRC (Ping timeout)
- [19:05:35] <Mouser> l3M3w - Good afternoone.
- [19:06:18] <l3M3w> good afternoon Mouser..
- [19:06:23] <l3M3w> interesting post you made :)
- [19:06:41] <l3M3w> I see mime has been silenced by your truth!
- [19:07:07] <Mouser> l3M3w - yes, something that occured to me when I was reading several years ago, was the lack of attacks on sinners that he was eating with..
- [19:07:20] <Mouser> the bible is clear that he ate with publicans and sinners..
- [19:07:43] <l3M3w> indeed
- [19:07:45] <l3M3w> :)
- [19:08:20] <mime> What did Jesus say to publicans and sinners? Go, and sin no more. So while it is interesting for some people to observe that Jesus was a peaceful person, it is even more interesting to view his teachings in this regard.
- [19:09:37] Zanadu (~textual@68.129.130.251) left IRC (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
- [19:09:39] X sets mode +l 30
- [19:10:30] <Toph> mime,,, other than the one occasion with the woman caught in adultery, where does Jesus say, go, sin no more?
- [19:10:56] <Mouser> Toph - What about the woman at the well?
- [19:11:08] <Toph> nope
- [19:11:16] <mime> Jesus speaks of repentance many and various times, Toph. Yes, all of Jesus ministry is a preaching of this doctrine, that Gods kingdom is near and that humankind must repent.
- [19:11:33] <Mouser> Toph - how about the lame man that had his sins forgiven?
- [19:11:37] Conservative (~fred@SmokeDrugs.users.undernet.org) joined the channel
- [19:11:43] <Mouser> Conservative welcome back
- [19:11:52] <Toph> mime,,, I agree,, but Jesus used that phrase only once if I recall
- [19:12:15] <Conservative> thank you kindly
- [19:12:16] <mime> I dont understand what kind of bearing such has upon what is said, Toph.
- [19:12:17] <Conservative> how is the TEAM this morning
- [19:12:21] Conservative gags lol
- [19:12:50] <Toph> <mime> What did Jesus say to publicans and sinners? Go, and sin no more.
- [19:12:57] <mime> Are you arguing that Christians could live as they please, even in contradiction with Gods grace and the works of the Holy Ghost, Toph?
- [19:13:06] <mime> Yes, Toph.
- [19:13:58] <Mouser> Toph - He did not appear to deal with their sins specifically or generally most of the time
- [19:14:39] <mime> ?kjv Luke 13:3-5
- [19:14:39] <@pete-> Luke13:3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. (KJV)
- [19:14:39] <@pete-> Luke13:4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem? (KJV)
- [19:14:39] <@pete-> Luke13:5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. (KJV)
- [19:15:21] <mime> This is the word Jesus preached to publicans and sinners, yes, to the whole generation of Adams children.
- [19:16:10] <mime> Christians understand that, of course. It would be most devious to try to give a different impression of Jesus teaching if one claims to be a Christian.
- [19:17:51] <mime> Yes, exactly because Christians are given to understand the doctrines of God, they will be held responsible for what they say about the same to the ignorants and sinners.
- [19:18:15] Jeff_ (~p32@mtrlpq4709w-lp140-01-70-30-220-150.dsl.bell.ca) left IRC (Ping timeout)
- [19:23:29] chariot (~androirc@46.156.189.176.tmi.telenormobil.no) joined the channel
- [19:23:38] OldOneEye (~poo@OldOneEye.users.undernet.org) joined the channel
- [19:23:38] pete- sets mode +b *!*@OldOneEye.users.undernet.org
- [19:23:38] pete- kicked OldOneEye from the channel (antagonistic comments not allowed on #Scripture)
- [19:26:29] chariot (~androirc@46.156.189.176.tmi.telenormobil.no) left IRC (Ping timeout)
- [19:28:39] <mime> ?kjv 1Tim 1:8-11
- [19:28:40] <@pete-> 1Tim1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; (KJV)
- [19:28:40] <@pete-> 1Tim1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, (KJV)
- [19:28:40] <@pete-> 1Tim1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; (KJV)
- [19:28:40] <@pete-> 1Tim1:11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust. (KJV)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement