arvada

For the record, the rule wasn't on the record!

Nov 18th, 2015
141
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.38 KB | None | 0 0
  1. ArVaDa-: do you have a second?
  2. ~The Immortal: maybe
  3. ArVaDa-: i very much realize how scpinion will continue to run monotype, and i understand your job as a OM leader to keep the peace, but i genuinely do not understand the hostility to the newest post you deleted of mine.
  4. ArVaDa-: I will not lie I am opinionated, however I complied with the rules of the thread and what you recently said at the time.
  5. ~The Immortal: which post is that, remind me
  6. ArVaDa-: oras monotype, the which was below yours at the time of deletion
  7. ~The Immortal: the one above scpinion, i see
  8. ArVaDa-: yes
  9. ~The Immortal: it isn't a topic for discussion
  10. ArVaDa-: that is perfectly fine if that is how it is, but it isnt clearly defined that tiering philosophies are not up for discussion on the rules page, and your original post seemed to imply i could suggest a complex ban with sablnite, thats all, im not upset, just wanted to understand rules
  11. ~The Immortal: yes
  12. ~The Immortal: i'm about to fix that
  13. ~The Immortal: and get scp to add it to the rules
  14. ~The Immortal: anyway
  15. ~The Immortal: the point is
  16. ArVaDa-: alrighty, ty for your time, sorry for making you delete posts lol
  17. ~The Immortal: the thread is for metagame discussion and not philosophy discussion
  18. ~The Immortal: you may propose a complex ban if you wish as it involves the metagame
  19. ~The Immortal: although it's unlikely the complex ban will be accepted
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment