Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Please reflect:
- 1) Presumption from silence or willful ignorance can not conclude that God Almighty never prescribed submission to His Will.
- 2) God revealed the same clear message as with all of the Prophets, in the Arabic language. Are you objecting to the message, or to the language?
- 3) The name in Arabic is not the only name. In Turkish, "Kurt" means "wolf". In Arabic, "dhib" means what "Kurt" means in Turkish. Are you going to say Turks and Arabs invented a different animal, or will you accept the simple phenomena of language in which terms are used?
- 4) A complete history of the Arabic peoples is not known, nor is it of people in general. To that point as mentioned in 1 above, the previous Arab nations had prophets - and they were obliterated. So you can not demonstrate that, if they spoke the same tongue, they were not prescribed the same name for the same religion that God prescribed in various tongues to all people.
- 5) As with 1&4 above, you do not have demonstration that God Almighty ever prescribed anything other than submission to His Will. The Bibles are rather silent on this, as with many other matters.
- 6) You would like me to be a Christian? If we were speaking in Arabic, you would like me to be what, "نصراني" (nasrani)? Are you suggesting I should be a religion that, by your own standards, began after Islam?
- 7) I invent a new language tomorrow, and you decide to speak to me in it. The word I invent for "Christian" is "CttC". Would inviting me in that language somehow constitute inviting me to a religion invented in the 21st century? Perhaps you can tell me when "Christian" was first used in English so that I can know when your religion began?
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment