Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 21st, 2017
56
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.41 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:42 PM
  2. I've had the same discussion with kittenz as well btw LUUL
  3. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:46 PM
  4. if psychology was an interest of yours, you'd have a different opinion.
  5. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:47 PM
  6. nnnope I actually based my arguments on a philosophical construct
  7. I agree on you that, given the same basis on good and bad, you can tell objectively wether overwatch is good or bad
  8. but some might see some arguments as not bad or not as bad and the other way around
  9. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:50 PM
  10. that comes down to how well the argument is constructed and how critical the person you tell it to is about what they take serious or not.
  11. if someone has done something for longer than someone else, and does it better, that persons opinion immediately becomes more credible, especially if that person does not have a financial incentive to go against their principles.
  12. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:51 PM
  13. there is a saying: "objectively my objectivity is not objective"
  14. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:51 PM
  15. that saying is referring to the problem of semantics
  16. and if you make it into an issue of semantics, then saying that anything is "objective" or "subjective" is erroneous
  17. because as far as relativity is concerned; everything IS or ISN'T. Nothing inbetween.
  18. but for everything else, opinions encompass both objectivity and subjectivity, based on what you say
  19. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:53 PM
  20. good and bad is a more complex structure than is or isn't tho
  21. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:53 PM
  22. for example, I would take atomicus' opinion on overwatch over seagull's opinion on overwatch
  23. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:54 PM
  24. on the quality of the game?
  25. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:54 PM
  26. yes
  27. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:54 PM
  28. but the thing I'm saying is, the defintion of the quality of the game differenciates from person to person
  29. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:55 PM
  30. so does everything, and if you valued every single opinion the same way, then you would never be able to formulate an opinion of your own
  31. because you'd get too much misinformation from all directions
  32. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:55 PM
  33. the concept of quality defines a collective of characteristics about an object, but this collective isn't the same for every person
  34. that's why you say what a good game is before you say wether something is a good game or not
  35. and that goes with everything
  36. you predefine the space your opinion is pointed at
  37. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:57 PM
  38. yes, because you can assume that everyone comprehends the basic framework of what someone is trying to accomplish with a specific product
  39. like an FPS game
  40. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:57 PM
  41. I'm not saying you should do that before saying in chat that the game is bad or anything, don't get me wrong LUUL
  42. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:57 PM
  43. example; someone might be attracted to broken noses
  44. but having a broken nose is still objectively bad, because it makes it harder to breathe
  45. and based on the framework on human anatomy
  46. I can say that having a broken nose is bad
  47. and ALSO unattractive
  48. that doesn't make it any less credible
  49. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:58 PM
  50. it could be objectively good as well, because it means that you are a boxer maybe and you are strong and can survive
  51. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:58 PM
  52. because it's not equivocal
  53. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:58 PM
  54. and that makes it also attractive again
  55. I actually know someone who likes people with scars for exactly that reason
  56. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:59 PM
  57. it's not objectively good if it doesn't work properly
  58. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 10:59 PM
  59. it might look less appealing to you but to others it's a sign of strength
  60. Mixie - Yesterday at 10:59 PM
  61. not within the confines of it's own framework
  62. if breaking your nose gets you a better job
  63. then that makes it objectively good, INDIRECTLY
  64. but it's consequential
  65. Mixie - Yesterday at 11:00 PM
  66. the broken nose, in itself, is still bad
  67. the financial incentive that blizzard have of overwatch, means that they will try to promote it as a good game
  68. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 11:00 PM
  69. yes, within that definition, and that's exactly what I wanted to say
  70. Mixie - Yesterday at 11:00 PM
  71. and that goes with people who play it too
  72. Bobbeldibob - Yesterday at 11:00 PM
  73. or framework as you call it
  74. Mixie - Yesterday at 11:00 PM
  75. because some people don't want to admit that they paid money for something bad
  76. that's part of basic human psychology
  77. no one wants to admit they made a bad purchase
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement