Advertisement
Guest User

Arno convo

a guest
Jul 16th, 2018
75
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.03 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [59th] Arno: The thread was locked and Scandy specifically said, not to post on it again. Why post on it?
  2. [59th] Arno: I have no problem with Joe seeing the conversation
  3. [59th] Arno: Seems odd though that you would disregard what Scandy says however
  4. SacLamb: I told scandy before I made the comment
  5. SacLamb: so yee
  6. SacLamb: Its logs
  7. [59th] Arno: And Scandy said
  8. [59th] Arno: yes?
  9. SacLamb: so joe doesnt have to dig him up itself
  10. SacLamb: You can see I didnt reply to any of your comments
  11. SacLamb: on the thread
  12. SacLamb: which I wanted to
  13. [59th] Arno: That doesnt matter
  14. [59th] Arno: Feel free to comeent
  15. [59th] Arno: its why it is there
  16. SacLamb: No the point is
  17. SacLamb: the thread is lock to prevent further arguments from the previous day as it was getting off topic
  18. SacLamb: the logs etc. are pretty necessary for joe to make an informed decision
  19. [59th] Arno: I'm well aware
  20. SacLamb: I dont have anything against you personally, I stated before I think you re a pretty reasonable guy
  21. [59th] Arno: Out of curosity however
  22. [59th] Arno: I would like your opinion on something
  23. SacLamb: but what happens on the server / is said etc. must be told to joe
  24. SacLamb: ofc
  25. [59th] Arno: I had a look at meme-sieges application
  26. [59th] Arno: The criticism of my application
  27. [59th] Arno: seems to parallel the mistakes of him similiarly
  28. [59th] Arno: with the sarcasm etc
  29. [59th] Arno: Yet it wasnt taken to heart
  30. [59th] Arno: You know they better than I
  31. SacLamb: we dont mind the sarcasm so much, its the whole '59th will get me this or that' that gets on peoples nerves I think
  32. SacLamb: it was never clear to us you were joking
  33. SacLamb: and it probably never will be known if you were or not
  34. [59th] Arno: How? lol
  35. SacLamb: but you know we ve had people who said those things unironically to us before
  36. SacLamb: stuff like 'I ll get 59th to add me anyways'
  37. [59th] Arno: People scared of a 59th coup
  38. SacLamb: and they were dead serious about it
  39. SacLamb: its not a coup thats the issue
  40. SacLamb: no way do I think you want to coup us
  41. SacLamb: its the whole, getting admin through a different process that gets on peoples nerves
  42. SacLamb: before you app was even posted, wookie had already been given admin, and the 3 of you ofc had been added to admin on discord
  43. SacLamb: wookie never applied nor was active on the server much beforehand
  44. SacLamb: it looked to a lot of people like different standards were being applied to the 3 due to their 59th ties
  45. SacLamb: which I hope you can understand wouldnt sit right with a lot of them
  46. SacLamb: and with me as well
  47. [59th] Arno: Yes, however i've still noticed a general dislike among some of the admins
  48. [59th] Arno: Scandy as also touched on this
  49. [59th] Arno: has*
  50. [59th] Arno: towards 59th
  51. [59th] Arno: *
  52. SacLamb: That I would expect is mostly due to your convo with them on friday
  53. SacLamb: where you essentially had a go at them for doing something thats allowed
  54. SacLamb: ofc you can disagree with whether or not it was allowed
  55. SacLamb: but saying stuff like 'back then you d be remove for this etc'
  56. SacLamb: makes you look very arrogant. The same goes with the convo with dim
  57. SacLamb: saying you were an admin when you re not, that you got added for the campaign etc.
  58. [59th] Arno: Still very counterintuitive to the admin application process, to be bias towards someone, based on different views
  59. SacLamb: we have 59th admins btw already and they re all well liked and people get on with them
  60. [59th] Arno: and knit picking at an application
  61. SacLamb: They re commenting essentially on your past behavior in recent days
  62. SacLamb: imagine if you were admin and someone from the say, 63e came on
  63. SacLamb: and started saying how you guys were rubbish admins, how they did things better,
  64. SacLamb: then you find out one of them have been added to admin using a 63e connection
  65. SacLamb: it wouldnt sit right
  66. [59th] Arno: Yes I understand, however taking things personally and hindering the application process still seems flawed.
  67. [59th] Arno: As someone who is well connected to alot of the M&B modding community etc and on other servers, stuff like this wouldn't last.
  68. [59th] Arno: So lets just leave it at a difference in opinion
  69. [59th] Arno: Note: *What i've said there... not saying it won't last - I do believe it will last, however seems counterintuitive
  70. [59th] Arno: From my application, I only hope that people see it from a different perspective
  71. [59th] Arno: and not be tunnel visioned, from one brief argument
  72. SacLamb: I will accept that how they worded their opinions were perhaps a bit too hostile
  73. SacLamb: however they are trying to state what they ve seen from you so joe can make an informed decision
  74. SacLamb: I will also accept that perhaps, some bad experiences in the past with some 59th claiming to use their connection or that they re better than them because they re in the 59th has made them very wary of this happening again
  75. SacLamb: and it shouldnt be on you to answer to that
  76. SacLamb: however, some of the things you did, did seem like using your connections etc. which is why it flared up
  77. SacLamb: nobody ever brings it up with gio for example
  78. [59th] Arno: Not sure if Scandy informed you of this either - Spoke to Pew, all cleared up. It was confusion over 59th recruitment admins being added, while others thought it was regular admins. It's all binned now and will be handled via app because 59th recruitment admins on NRP can't even slay or do anything beyond actually advertise 59th
  79. unless they become full admin
  80. [59th] Arno: just seen this a few minutes ago
  81. SacLamb: yes the problem came perhaps from pew himself saying publicly to add you guys as admin, and hearing the same on the server from comments you made
  82. SacLamb: altho perhaps it was a misunderstanding
  83. [59th] Arno: Yes well, I wasn't aware of how sensitive people have become to it and I will admit I over stepped
  84. SacLamb: thank you honestly for saying that. I did feel perhaps we went a bit far in your criticism as well, regardless of whatever happened, it as never doubted that you do care about the server
  85. SacLamb: Ive heard and seen myself that you were a good admin back then
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement