Lesta

18 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-16 2350 +Turgeon B. Mackafin

Aug 16th, 2016
58
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.49 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-16 2350 +Turgeon B. Mackafin
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OjrR_x25i0&lc=z12bc1ea1rbdgneuh22xuva4orm4sjaiq04
  3. https://pastebin.com/6hYhfHqh
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Turgeon B. Mackafin __ Cheers for that lengthy and detailed message. Now it's my turn. What you wrote reads like the kind of "synopsis" I'd expect a person to be given in order to turn them against another. *Did you really gather all of those points for yourself or were they more simply handed to you?*
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. If you are a sincere person who is here for the right reasons - _and you may well be_ - then I'd like an opportunity to point out how incredibly wrong you are about what you appear to have taken the time and care to outline.
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. Given that I've never heard of you before I'm sure you'll understand I need to test your own honesty. After all - *there's no use trying to reason with the unreasonable or a puppet account*. So let's be satisfied you're not just here because you crave mischief and feel like practicing tomfoolery to pass the time.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. Since you appear to have a kind of "insight" into my ideas and presentations - tell me - have I gotten anything right? *What are some things you would say I've gotten right and have pointed out as having genuine merit and value?*
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. _Or is it really all bad?_ Really?
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. If you've drawn a blank I'll help you out. *You cannot be an intelligent and honest person who is familiar with my work and not also be familiar with the concept of "sufficient proof"*. Are you familiar with this specialised concept and - for example - how it is applied to what you have characterised as "pixel hunting"?
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. To your awareness is there anyone else on YouTube - _or even the Internet_ - who is pointing out that so-termed "sufficient proof" is being intentionally and systematically withheld from lie system events and claims? Who else has pointed out it's the common denominator?
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. To your awareness is anyone else - anywhere - raising awareness as to how such a simple form of apparent censorship has *devastating consequences* for the population? One such consequence being that the population is trained to train itself to accept lies when they are presented as truth?
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70. By undermining me you are - unwittingly or not - undermining that important message. Why would you do such a thing if the answer isn't because of ignorance?
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78. So I'm asking you: *what do you feel Lesta has gotten right?* What ideas and concepts do you feel have merit? If you really know my work - and if you really are an honest person with an IQ of average - then you'll be able to list some things I've gotten right without also misrepresenting them.
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86. Or is everything I do garbage? Can it really be you'd prefer people listen to those charming and entertaining folk who - this month - happen to be talking about fantastic 60-mile high trees in such a way that targets the intellectually vulnerable? Or would you prefer this merely because they don't refer to their audience of drooling dummies as drooling dummies? (I noted in your other comment elsewhere an objection to my use of referring to retards as "retards". Is calling a retard a retard somehow more offensive to you than calling a confidence artist a confidence artist?)
  87.  
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92.  
  93.  
  94. As it happens I'm already familiar with your "objections". *It should not be a surprise to anyone paying attention that none of them stand up to scrutiny*. So I wonder - can you bring yourself to say anything positive about Lesta?
  95.  
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102. In my experience dishonest people running a flawed game can never say anything positive about their perceived threats without it also being a veiled attack.
  103.  
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108.  
  109.  
  110. I'm happy to respond to each of your "objections" but let's first be sure you're not a dishonest time-waster. So go ahead and fill up another reply - only this time with positive things - *or let your silence be as a confession to your true motives for commenting on this thread*.
  111.  
  112.  
  113.  
  114. ______________________________________________________________
  115. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  116.  
  117. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  118. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  119.  
  120. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  121. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  122.  
  123. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  124. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  125.  
  126. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  127. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  128.  
  129. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  130. What exists - exists to always exist.
  131. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment