Kristoph Gavin Newsom 2nd question points script

I have a message for Democrats in California: even if you are voting against the Kristoph Gavin Newsom recall as the majority would, please for the love of God actually answer the ballot's second question, the one that would be your vote for whoever would replace Kristoph Gavin Newsom. I can't stress this enough. And don't do something lame like claim that Kristoph Gavin Newsom should get to replace himself as your "answer" to the second question, it doesn't work like that. Just answer the second question with your acceptable answer of filling in the bullet hole, or your vote will become a waste if the recall goes through. The whole question's point is a contingency effort. That much should be clear cut. If you're not bothering in the least with answering that question, that will just be one less vote for the Republican agenda to worry about.

And yes, I say this as obviously somebody who voted for Kristoph Gavin Newsom to be replaced. There are Democratic candidates on the list. I voted for Holly L. Baade, profession Mother/Business Owner. I looked through the other candidates first as well and deem her the most likely to fix California's failure to provide healthy regard to healing and communication, both of which California desperately needs. I can be sure other involved professions could interest Democrats, but the point stands that there's a pool of alternatives to work with should Kristoph Gavin Newsom be replaced for things like his maskless dinner elitism while California keeps being under siege from wildfires and has to put up with unacceptable rent prices like $1600/month for an in-law unit right at a murder site.

There's also the issue of ballot sabotage attempts happening, which the Republican agenda has proven themselves time and again to be anything but above. Place your ballot where you are certain that won't happen, such as a post office. Know what else I did for security? I called the county's election office just today to make that my ballot got through and it did. That brings me to another point: the purpose of that phone call was to make sure a letter I included in the enclosed envelope couldn't have been taken by some sabotage attempt, because that letter also contains some information I would not have wanted to be accessible to some sociopath. If you don't get it, let's just say I was making a point about Tucker Carlson's display of the Republican agenda and what I say in the mix is supposed to be viewed by the government. Needless to say that I can cite the phone call in question to useful effect.

The letter in general, if you're wondering, is my punctuation that California is in DIRE need of improving its standards with healing and communication. The second half of it actively talks about my parents' house and surrounding politics, which I would hope would go without saying after bringing that up for the umpteenth time, but the first half does showcase how the political war has dragged out the general nightmares already. It does, of course, condemn Kristoph Gavin Newsom for his aristocracy and also reiterate my vote of Holly L. Baade. I also mention a personal and sensitive detail to make it clear how I'm serious, in addition to capitalizing upon how this would be my attempt to communicate privately with the government to handle a given case of legal control over something I've been really wanting, so the government would have to know that I'm attempting to communicate with THEM in the first place.

Not only that, you might have noticed that I mention about the letter having halves. Guess what? That refers to how I used BOTH sides of the used paper, and this is considering that I do NOT write my letters big, instead doing things like crossing my sevens to maximize legibility via letter distinction. At most, I simply wrote in all caps at the start my summary message that California needs a better standard of healing and communication. The "Sincerely, me" part, which by the way is marked with a Chess Knight doodle, is still all the way at the bottom of the second half's side. That's how much I had to say and by the way, believe me, I couldn't say everything I wanted to. Also, I wrote the letter in pen, granted out of convenience, but this does tie further into the concept of the whole thing being more authentic. That's not even getting into how I signed the letter with my signature, just in case being mixed in with the ballot didn't do the trick. Oh yeah, and that's before mentioning how I snapshotted the final product on both sides, including the disclaimer pointing this out too, so the letter is recorded on my cell phone which obviously I'll keep closely guarded.

California Democrats, care to point out anything else I could be missing? Even if you could, my point stands: your attempts at convenient narratives are getting scorched by the wildfires that you allowed to run around in your acedia and superficiality that was already rampant well before that disgrace to my dad's name held the US's primary office for 4 years straight to become an excuse. You could still fix this, but you won't be getting anywhere if you think refusing to answer the ballot's second question is going to help matters. There's bound to be enough among your own ranks to want Kristoph Gavin Newsom replaced by somebody like Holly L. Baade. I should know as one of them. The problem is if too few Democrats answer the second ballot question to provide enough voting power to a Democratic replacement, ALL Democrats, you AND me alike, will lose when Kristoph Gavin Newsom is out of office on September 14.

California Democrats, please answer the second ballot question correctly. Doing so is completely tame compared to the effort I went with and could only help the true Democrats, which you need to learn to be in the first place.