Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- "Concern over the reliability of the results published in scientific literature has been growing for some time.
- According to a survey published in the journal Nature last summer, more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments."
- https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
- ----------
- Oh you don't say, who could have ever guessed, this is a totally new problem that no one has yet foreseen or called into question, I can't believe this, oh nooo heeeelp us Darwin, Dawkins, Tyson, Nye, somebodeeeeeeeee
- Also
- >BBC
- lol I know, ironic because BBC is as fake news as fake news gets (CNN/Fox tier or worse in some cases, maybe even Vice or BuzzFeed levels terrible)
- ----------
- This problem with (((science))) is going to become more and more apparent as free public channels continue to challenge authoritative information... Assuming we can keep the net decentralized and don't let Big 6 legacy media and DARPA projects like facebook run amok any more than they already have.
- Wait, the Internet was a DARPA project itself... But still, its infrastructure was at least decentralized.
- Anyone remember that case where it turned out some vaccines CAN cause autism? Where the lab responsible covered it up despite knowing better? So much "settled science" is bogus, since the founding of the Royal Society even.
- Just you wait, Ancient Aliens is going to replace our current history curriculum in another 20 years. That's how off-base everything is. Darwin's theory will be taken down a peg when we reach the unavoidable conclusion that humans were genetically spliced ~300,000 years ago. Though evolution isn't TOTALLY false, just an incomplete narrative.
- And climate change is clearly caused by celestial and geological factors, except for covert weather engineering which we have no real public studies on.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
