It's easy to debunk your pseudodocumentary. Let's take a look at the Holocaust part of it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilc4ZIMRTjo

The Nuremberg Danzig soap has never been debunked. It was not mass-produced (hence Lipstadt's quote, for context see http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/holocaust-era-soap-find-raises-new-questions/ ), but "attempts" were indeed made. It was obviously not the "Jewish soap", which is a myth.

The shrunken heads are supported by documentary evidence: http://web.archive.org/web/20121101074627/http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/camps/buchenwald/images/buchenwald-doc01.gif

So are the tattoos, which were gathered from corpses for Museum of Criminality http://web.archive.org/web/20130412150642/http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/camps/buchenwald/images/buchenwald-doc04.gif

You're lying about no extermination decision having been found, it has in Goebbels' diary entry describing Hitler's speech in a small circle of high-ranking officials on 12.12.41:

"Regarding the Jewish question, the Führer is determined to clear the table. He warned the Jews that if they were to cause another world war, it would lead to their own destruction.
Those were not empty words. Now the world war has come. The destruction of the Jews must be its necessary consequence. We cannot be sentimental about it. It is not for us to feel sympathy for the Jews. We should have sympathy rather with our own German people. If the German people have to sacrifice 160,000 victims in yet another campaign in the east, then those responsible for this bloody conflict will have to pay for it with their lives."

At 7:20 you raise a strawman as well as a false dichotomy.

First you imply that the only evidence that should count are autopsy reports, photos or footage.

You forget about the documentary evidence, e.g. http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2015/10/contemporary-german-documents-on.html

Then you imply that the only gassing witnesses that count testified at Nuremberg (and yes, Nuremberg witnesses could be cross-examined).

The fact is that there were many dozens of trials having to do specifically with gassings, and hundreds about the Holocaust in general (which is not reducible to gassings). Of them many took place in West Germany, so the "Soviets" part was just another strawman.

The "Auschwitz had lots of non-extermination stuff" idiocy is debunked at http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#auschwitzswimmingpool

Also see http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#unfit

David Cole now admits that Nazis gassed and shot Jews on a massive scale which debunks your film right there and then:

http://www.countercontempt.com/archives/5348

Some of Cole's nitpicks about the small Auschwitz gas chamber are treated at http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#kremachimney and http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#flimsydoor

All Cole debunked were *misconceptions* about the small gas chamber (which was not in the extermination camp Birkenau in the first place and in which only a few gassings happened).

Sure, the Soviets tried to reconstruct the small gas chamber (after the crematorium morgue had been converted into an air-raid shelter) and partially botched the job, big deal. This doesn't refute the small gas chamber in the slightest, nor, of course, the big GCs at Birkenau.

He is of course wrong about there being only witness evidence:

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/02/separate-accommodation-in-auschwitz.html

Aerial photos do show smoke:

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-auschwitz-open-air-incineration.html

The cyanide residue has been found, Leuchter has been exposed as a fraud:

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#idiotleuchter

The alleged photo fakery is dealt with at http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#photos

The "300,000 dead" argument is a lie, only registered inmates were meant in that footage, very obviously (the "official" figure was 4,000,000 after all).

The plaque argument is debunked at http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#auschwitzplaque

The First Holocaust nonsense is debunked at http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#firstholocaust

There are laws against denying the Armenian genocide and the law in Turkey that bans the assertion of the Armenian genocide, so your claim about the Holocaust being the only such event is another lie.

Of course, you never ever deal with the extensive documentary evidence for the Holocaust, you're totally silent about the massacres of Jews like Babiy Yar http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/03/evidence-on-babi-yar-massacre-29-30.html or other mobile killing units massacres.

You have failed at life.