Function Strength Quantification

Function Strength Quantification
--------------------------------

We may express each block of a sociotype as a metaphysical quadrant in an attempt to formalise Model B. Earlier I wrote that numbers of Model B are strength exponenets. I guess I just wrote whatever because I fel sure they aren't dimensions. But they may be more closely related to dimensions than exponents.

Let us substitute the word "dimension" with "resolution". Now Model B is about resolutions of quadrants so that the resolution of the accepting function determines the X resolution and the resolution of the producing function determines the Y resolution. Earlier I desribed a female SEE to have a black-and-white understanding of feminism.

The female SEE of the example finds feminism to either apply to some issue or not. She doesn't want to use feminism in any other way than in relation to her interests. If there's any problem about feminism she'll tempt others to explain the problem for her instead of trying to explain it herself.

This may be interpreted so that her Super-Ego Intuition is more accurate about whether some issue is related to feminism than it is about what feminism has to say about that.

According to the Function Strength Quantification hypothesis the X resolution of the Super-Ego is 2 and the Y resolution is 1. Counting indeed should be began from 1, not 0. Furthermore, the X axis of the SEE Super-Ego is that of Introverted Intuition and the Y axis that of Introverted Thinking.

Hence, her idea of feminism isn't exactly "black-and-white". Only her way of implementing that idea is black and white. If she wants feminism she'd prefer to fashion reality according to feminism than feminism according to reality.

The ILI Id would also prefer to adjust reality according to a model than the other way around. But the resolution of the ILI Id is double, which means the ILI Id would prefer to improve existing models of reality instead of developing new ones.