Round #1:

23 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
URU: 0
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 4
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1
HIN: 0
SAY: 0

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
3 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: SAY was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #2:

22 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
URU: 0
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 4
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1
HIN: 0

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: HIN was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #3:

21 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
URU: 0
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 4
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
URU has the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Round #4:

20 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 4
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
9 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 4 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 4. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: ERI was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #5:

19 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 4
DIZ: 1
JEL: 3
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
8 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 3 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: RIE was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #6:

18 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 23
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 5
DIZ: 1
JEL: 3
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
7 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: DIZ was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #7:

17 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 24
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 5
JEL: 3
EMB: 1
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 6
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
6 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: REM was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #8:

16 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 24
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 5
JEL: 3
EMB: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 7
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
5 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: EMB was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #9:

15 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 24
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 7
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
4 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: RUN was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #10:

14 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 25
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 7
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
3 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: SHI was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #11:

13 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 26
NAS: 1
IOR: 6
MIC: 8
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
PAN: 7
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: NAS was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #12:

12 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 26
IOR: 6
MIC: 9
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
PAN: 7
EIM: 3
MUY: 1

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
MUY has the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Round #13:

11 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 26
IOR: 6
MIC: 9
TEN: 3
PIP: 56
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
PAN: 8
EIM: 3

PIP has the highest number of votes with 56 votes (44.80%)
AIR has the lowest number of votes with 2 votes (1.60%)

Round #14:

10 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 3
LIA: 26
IOR: 6
MIC: 9
TEN: 3
PIP: 58
LUM: 6
JEL: 3
PAN: 8
EIM: 3

PIP has the highest number of votes with 58 votes (46.40%)
4 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 3 votes (2.40%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: SGC was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #15:

9 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 26
IOR: 6
MIC: 9
TEN: 4
PIP: 58
LUM: 6
JEL: 5
PAN: 8
EIM: 3

PIP has the highest number of votes with 58 votes (46.40%)
EIM has the lowest number of votes with 3 votes (2.40%)

Round #16:

8 candidates and 124 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 26
IOR: 6
MIC: 10
TEN: 4
PIP: 58
LUM: 6
JEL: 5
PAN: 9

PIP has the highest number of votes with 58 votes (46.77%)
TEN has the lowest number of votes with 4 votes (3.23%)

Round #17:

7 candidates and 124 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 27
IOR: 6
MIC: 11
PIP: 58
LUM: 7
JEL: 5
PAN: 10

PIP has the highest number of votes with 58 votes (46.77%)
JEL has the lowest number of votes with 5 votes (4.03%)

Round #18:

6 candidates and 124 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 28
IOR: 6
MIC: 11
PIP: 58
LUM: 8
PAN: 13

PIP has the highest number of votes with 58 votes (46.77%)
IOR has the lowest number of votes with 6 votes (4.84%)

Round #19:

5 candidates and 124 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 33
MIC: 11
PIP: 59
LUM: 8
PAN: 13

PIP has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.58%)
LUM has the lowest number of votes with 8 votes (6.45%)

Round #20:

4 candidates and 124 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 35
MIC: 13
PIP: 59
PAN: 17

PIP has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.58%)
MIC has the lowest number of votes with 13 votes (10.48%)

Round #21:

3 candidates and 117 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
LIA: 38
PIP: 59
PAN: 20

PIP has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (50.43%)
PAN has the lowest number of votes with 20 votes (17.09%)

PIP won!