Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-19 0410 +rorscharch5380

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-19 0410 +rorscharch5380
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb6SCYZ6pQQ&lc=z12nwlcigmaxhj4s122vxvu4wzymczqqn04
https://pastebin.com/4Ry40pL4
__


+rorscharch5380 __ [You know what to expect when you write Lesta a comment.] My phrasing is fine which is why I pushed on. If I have just said a video cannot be altered or summarised without losing some essential meaning and if I have also just said you cannot with certainty trust a video that is not from my channel *then of course the only way to share a "full and intact" video would be to distribute a link [to the original].* ))




It is not often I do this so consider yourself fortunate. In this reply I will let you in on two of Lesta's secrets.




The first secret: have you noticed how I sometimes underline words and (parts of) sentences? Such as I did in the "warning" text? Did you notice that the awkwardly phrased sentence contained some underlined words? >>>> *I underline words and sentences where none of the letters of a word fall below the bottom of the line - such as I have done with this sentence.* <<<< (Like the "warning" text that was awkwardly written to demonstrate my point.)




Look again at the warning text at 00:02 and note all the underlined words do not have letters that dip below the bottom of the line (d, a, e, h, t, n, u, c are some good random letters for underlining whereas p, j, y, q are not). This is consistent throughout all of my videos (there may be the occasional sleep deprived mistake).




I wanted to underline the words "full and intact" as well as "share and recommend"  and to do so the sentence I wrote is the one you got. Something that people are slow to catch on is that *I know what the f_kc I am doing.* If I have phrased something in an awkward way then instead of thinking Lesta has demonstrated incompetence one's first thought should be that there is a reason for it. *It is not ever my fault that someone is too slow and stupid to perceive that reason.* )) In 2016 this is going to play an even bigger role than it did in 2015.




However, I accept it should be improved and for the sake of clarity I have denied my OCD and forsaken a few underlined words. You will see those changes if you watch my next video. ))




When it comes to stupid people - _I am prepared to cater to low IQ losers_ - but only so far and so much. Mentally incompetent people will always find novel and ingenious ways to misunderstand, misinterpret and misrepresent. Especially if they are afflicted with an oppositional defiance disorder (as many do when it comes to me).




What I have to say is not for them. What I have to say is for good, honest and intelligent people who have the capacity to understand that they are a farmed animal born into a lie system.




And so it is time for the second secret. Though let me preface it by saying that my use of colours is not as bad as you make out. It is occasionally mentioned that I should stop or reduce it but that is not ever going to happen (there may be some slight adjustments though - like with the "warning" text).




What ultimately matters are the ideas and concepts that the (subjectively pretty/ugly) coloured words are being used to represent. I don't care how terrible your spelling is or how blunt you are or even how rude you can be. It does not ever matter WHO is speaking or HOW. All that matters is WHAT - the content - the substance. And if it is intelligent, positive and constructive then I am listening and have patience.




The "secret" is that my use of "crazy colours" is in part to deter two types of person. 1) Stupid people and 2) People who think the coloured writing is "childish".




It is an effort to filter out stupid, impatient and insecure people.




I have books that were printed in an old script where the "s" looks like an "f" and the letter "s" appears a lot in English words. By crikey *that* is frustrating but you don't see me whinging about it. *_People these days really do complain about nothing._*




The amount of writing also serves to filter out those who hate reading (I will be mentioning something about that at the start of each video). In time, more of the right people will end up bothering to watch my videos, read my Google Plus posts and skim over my YouTube comments.




*The wrong people will lose interest or laugh.*




If I give a stupid person a giggle then I'm okay with that. If I make a stupid person angry then it's my turn to giggle. Those who are angry at Lesta are really just angry at themselves because I have only presented myself in text form. _*Can you imagine someone getting angry at a colourful picture book!*_




It really is true: no one has to watch my videos or read my comments. People will seek out what interests them and if an idea resonates with an intelligent person then that is wonderful.




If my style is truly ugly then I won't have to worry about anyone trying to copy it. But we'll see about that. Bit by bit you may notice more and more people using *some* crazy colours. There will be exceptions of course _but it just wasn't *quite* the case in 2014 and earlier._ ))




I would like nothing more than for stupid people to become so frustrated with my "silent slideshows" that they stop watching them and unsubscribe. *The opinion of stupid people does not ever matter.*




Having said all of this - you are not a stupid person *and I do appreciate* the feedback! ))







__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w