33 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-11-04 1235 +Terran Downvale

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-11-04 1235 +Terran Downvale
https://plus.google.com/112413489582307671009/posts/inbbB26fJHi
https://pastebin.com/4DUk49t9
__

Everything by way of "news and content" from Yahoo!, Microsoft, Google etc. is *algorithm generated/influenced.* It's "weighted" for certain words and symbols. In part, that's about putting *the raw ingredients of thoughts into our mind* so as to "cook up a belief/idea/feeling"  in us _before_ we can realise why.

For the magic trick to work this has to happen *before* we can realise why else the idea/feeling won't *seem* to arise in our mind *naturally,* and we won't become *"self-convinced"* (that's the most important aspect).

I will now try to "prove" this to you with a simple example. The example should also help you to realise how dangerous to the mind Yahoo! News is since they are undeniably involved in this. Of all people you alone will know it.

Do you remember when *"orange"* first became a noticeable thing? The word, the colour, etc. The *theme?*

I remember you talking about it a long time ago. There were other people who also picked up on the "orange theme" as well and associated it with the occult, "Illuminati/NWA", fakery, etc.

For some time "orange" was a dominant focus for you and several other people. It was being connected to many things.

*When did you first notice it?* What year? When did you begin to notice the "change" to orange start happening around you?

Answer that and then I'll point out something very simple and very obvious. Something so simple and obvious you'll kick yourself for having not made the connection sooner.

But yet the connection is there. There was no way to have made the connection *sooner* because "orange" was just a single "thought ingredient" and not the entire recipe. It's not possible to have (fully) known what the "idea recipe" was for *until* enough individual "thought" ingredients had been put into the mix (in your mind).

The risk now is that when I point it out it'll be dismissed as a mere "coincidence". But of all people I think you'll be able to recognise it's not a mere coincidence even though it can't be proved.

You have often been noticing things and I am the first to agree that you are indeed noticing things that are there. _There are things to be noticed and you *are* noticing them!_

Yes, this is an *"orchestrated reality"* - but it's one where the individual *feels* they are calling the shots. For "normal people" it always feels like a free choice, it feels like they are the conductor of their own orchestra/reality. _But it's simple thought alchemy._

Where we (at the moment) differ is in what the presence of "thought ingredients" signify: I see the "things" that are there to be noticed (which I am the first to agree that you are correct in noticing) as the *basic/raw "ingredients"* that form a simple and cheap (perceptual) magic trick - rather than their presence signifying anything that's mystical or profound.

I.e., when you realise how the (perceptual) magic trick is being done it will seem cheap, worthless, obvious, simple, and audacious. But when you don't realise how the magic trick is being done it can only seem profound, mysterious, powerful, mystical, and even downright supernatural.

It's so simple you'll kick yourself (hopefully not hard or for long). You'll refuse at first to believe/accept it because the mind always wants things to be more complex than they really are. But yet, when I point it out you won't be able to deny I'm right (though at first you'll likely want to resist and read more into it).

It's still an "orchestrated reality" - just it's not nearly as "magical" and "mind blowing" as it seems to everyone who remains unaware of the *cheap* magic trick being relentlessly played.

So the question: What *year* did the "orange theme" *begin* to be noticed by you? (And if you can recall: was it early, mid, or late in that year?)

Answer that then I'll point something out that's ridiculously simple and obvious that connects the reason for "orange" arising in the first place ("everything is logical in hindsight").

__
+nationalparksign, +Terran Downvale


____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.