Lynn data looks to be basically accurate

Consistent pattern. Every so often, I think egalitarians have a point and have taught me something, only to learn it is bs.

Biggest criticism of Lynn is China and North Korea's scores. NK's are a bit hard to get accurate data on anyway, but China's are perhaps slightly inflated due to a focus on urban areas. However this runs into issues with the SK, Jap, and HK scores

http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-worlds-iq-86/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3c4TxciNeJZWUx5bzBWZ1BuMUk/view
Link here works better imo
http://www.unz.com/jthompson/richard-lynn-intelligence-database/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3c4TxciNeJZNUVaZ0VhZ3dUMkk/view

Database, you can analyze it yourself

Jelte Wicherts, whose use of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) secular gains in IQ subtests (the Flynn effect) correlate negatively with their “g-loadedness” (


https://medium.com/@houstoneuler/the-cherry-picked-science-in-voxs-charles-murray-article-bd534a9c4476

never heard anyone bitch @ the book or meta analyses
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn#Race_and_national_differences_in_intelligence