Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Dec 5th, 2017
176
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 23.90 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 22:08 < radius> if you don't want people from making money of your software don't release it to public
  2. 22:08 < radius> that's the only choice
  3. 22:08 <@DanteAli> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedega_(software)#Controversy
  4. 22:08 < retrobot> Title: Cedega (software) - Wikipedia
  5. 22:08 <@DanteAli> not really
  6. 22:08 < Alcaro> doesn't AGPL mess with saas somehow
  7. 22:08 <@DanteAli> companies should play fair
  8. 22:08 <@DanteAli> and paly according to the rules
  9. 22:08 < Alcaro> not sure what the exact rules are
  10. 22:08 < radius> they are playing by the rules
  11. 22:08 < radius> that's the thing
  12. 22:08 <@DanteAli> look what happened when WINE wrongly licensed their software in the beginning
  13. 22:09 <@DanteAli> Cedega happened
  14. 22:09 <@DanteAli> then they had to change the license to LGPL since the author was being a dickbag
  15. 22:09 <@DanteAli> then he kept playing those games until he eventually got acquired by nvidia
  16. 22:09 <@DanteAli> you can dress this up all you want
  17. 22:09 <@DanteAli> he was being abusive
  18. 22:09 <@DanteAli> and non-cooperative
  19. 22:09 <@DanteAli> and greedy
  20. 22:09 <@DanteAli> all at the same time
  21. 22:09 <@DanteAli> and if what I am saying is wrong - then apparently WINE authors agreed with me
  22. 22:09 <@DanteAli> since they changed the ilcense
  23. 22:09 <@DanteAli> to reflect his immoral behavior
  24. 22:09 <@DanteAli> and address it
  25. 22:10 < radius> in the end when you pick the license
  26. 22:10 < radius> you're picking the rules your playing with
  27. 22:10 < radius> you can otherwise sell it, put it behind some walled garden or something like that to try to stop others from profiting from it
  28. 22:10 <@DanteAli> thing is there should be self-imposed limits as to how much of a douchebag or scumbag you should be
  29. 22:10 <@DanteAli> and a lot of people apparently don’t have that self restraint
  30. 22:10 < radius> that means a complete reboot of human kind
  31. 22:10 <@DanteAli> which tells you all you need tok now about society
  32. 22:10 <@DanteAli> so no
  33. 22:10 < Juan> Everyone should be excellent to each other
  34. 22:10 <@DanteAli> I don’t agree with you
  35. 22:10 < Juan> D:
  36. 22:11 * Juan air guitars
  37. 22:11 <@DanteAli> and I think you argue in favor of what some big corporation with lots of money would want one to think
  38. 22:11 < radius> no, but if you want to stop people from profiting from your work
  39. 22:11 < radius> the GPL is a poor choice
  40. 22:11 <@DanteAli> then again
  41. 22:11 <@DanteAli> MIT is even worse
  42. 22:11 <@DanteAli> see what happened with WINE
  43. 22:11 <@DanteAli> Cedega would have literally not happened
  44. 22:11 < radius> of course it's not meant to do the things you want it to do
  45. 22:12 <@DanteAli> if it hadn’t been for MIT
  46. 22:12 <@DanteAli> in the beginning
  47. 22:12 <@DanteAli> so MIT/BSD if anything is ten times worse
  48. 22:12 <@DanteAli> it’s basically total corporation appeasing
  49. 22:12 <@DanteAli> with GPL at least you have to give some pretense of wanting to give back
  50. 22:12 <@DanteAli> which isn’t much
  51. 22:12 <@DanteAli> but at least something is required
  52. 22:12 <@DanteAli> which still isn’t worth jack shit
  53. 22:12 <@DanteAli> but yes i agree GPLis a poor choice by now - problem is
  54. 22:12 <@DanteAli> so are all these licenses
  55. 22:12 <@DanteAli> and the people behind them are living in the past
  56. 22:12 <@DanteAli> oblivious to the fact that people are walking out in droves
  57. 22:13 <@DanteAli> because of their inability to address these issues
  58. 22:13 < radius> that's why closed source exists, so you can make your product and profit from it, you and only you
  59. 22:13 <@DanteAli> problem with that is
  60. 22:13 <@DanteAli> the software often sucks and gets outdated
  61. 22:13 <@DanteAli> as soon as the author leaves
  62. 22:13 <@DanteAli> and sometimes even when the author is still active
  63. 22:13 <@DanteAli> see cemu
  64. 22:13 <@DanteAli> or even nebula model 2
  65. 22:13 < inolen> DanteAli: you're talking a lot of shit on someone you don't know
  66. 22:13 < inolen> fwiw
  67. 22:13 <@DanteAli> or so many other emus
  68. 22:14 < inolen> (Transgaming owner was my old boss, he's a great person)
  69. 22:14 <@DanteAli> I am not talking any shit
  70. 22:14 <@DanteAli> any shit I talk I crib directly from the wikipedia article
  71. 22:14 <@DanteAli> so go take it up with them
  72. 22:14 <@DanteAli> I dont’ give a fuck about this guy - never met him, don’t care to know him
  73. 22:15 <@DanteAli> you can leap to his defense all you want
  74. 22:15 <@DanteAli> fact of the matter is
  75. 22:15 <@DanteAli> WINE devs didn’t like what he was doing
  76. 22:15 < inolen> │16:08:58 @DanteAli | look what happened when WINE wrongly licensed their software in the beginning │ d3m3vilurr
  77. 22:15 < inolen> │16:09:01 @DanteAli | Cedega happened │ DanteEdward
  78. 22:15 < inolen> │16:09:12 @DanteAli | then they had to change the license to LGPL since the author was being a dickbag │ Devrim
  79. 22:15 <@DanteAli> otherwise htey wouldn’t have changed the license in light of his douchebaggery
  80. 22:15 < inolen> │16:09:21 @DanteAli | then he kept playing those games until he eventually got acquired by nvidia
  81. 22:15 <@DanteAli> yeah
  82. 22:15 <@DanteAli> that is what the wikipedia article states dude
  83. 22:15 <@DanteAli> go fucking read it
  84. 22:15 <@DanteAli> and leave me the fuck alone
  85. 22:15 < Juan> wikipedia articles state facts now
  86. 22:15 < Juan> D:
  87. 22:15 <@DanteAli> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedega_(software)#Controversy
  88. 22:15 < retrobot> Title: Cedega (software) - Wikipedia
  89. 22:15 <@DanteAli> it isn’t called ‘Controversy’ for nothing
  90. 22:15 < Alcaro> of course, if they don't then fix them
  91. 22:16 < inolen> he's a great person that successfully ran a company that employed ~50 or so extremely talented people and provided income for them
  92. 22:16 < inolen> pretty awesome accomplishment
  93. 22:16 <@DanteAli> yeah so says a guy putting redream now behind a one-time $5 paywall
  94. 22:17 < inolen> ...
  95. 22:17 < radius> and now things get personal
  96. 22:17 < radius> man...
  97. 22:17 <@DanteAli> he should stop prodding me then
  98. 22:17 <@DanteAli> it doesn’t need to go there
  99. 22:17 <@DanteAli> but if he insists
  100. 22:17 <@DanteAli> I am willing to overlook a ton of BS
  101. 22:17 <@DanteAli> but don’t start attacking me over things that I am not even saying but wikipedia does
  102. 22:17 <@DanteAli> where there is smoke there is fire
  103. 22:17 <@DanteAli> and since this guy routinely avoided contributing anything back
  104. 22:17 <@DanteAli> I call a spade a spade
  105. 22:18 <@DanteAli> fuck that guy
  106. 22:18 <@DanteAli> when I see somebody forking some project 0-day
  107. 22:18 <@DanteAli> raking in all the benefits
  108. 22:18 < radius> honestly it seems like a guy that was f'ed up by his license
  109. 22:18 <@DanteAli> and giving ezero back
  110. 22:18 < radius> since the license allowed other people to use what his company was making
  111. 22:18 <@DanteAli> then yeah - ‘what a great wonderful person’ - I thinkn ot
  112. 22:18 < radius> without paying
  113. 22:18 <@DanteAli> radius - doesn’t give him the right to be a douchebag about it
  114. 22:18 <@DanteAli> BTW
  115. 22:18 < radius> it reminds me of someone
  116. 22:19 < radius> not the person
  117. 22:19 < radius> but what seems to have happened
  118. 22:19 <@DanteAli> these were the days long before the days of kickstarter and all this other stuff
  119. 22:19 <@DanteAli> this was back in 2003/2004 or so
  120. 22:19 <@DanteAli> if everybody manhandled open source like that it would all go nowhere
  121. 22:19 < radius> it always seems like you think everyone thinks "HAR HAR, ok I found this in the Internet and I'm gonna fuck them up"
  122. 22:19 < radius> ignorance is no excuse
  123. 22:19 <@DanteAli> that’s what the WINE devs thought
  124. 22:20 <@DanteAli> hence why they changed the license
  125. 22:20 < radius> but sadly the first order of business isn't checking the license
  126. 22:20 < radius> for anyone
  127. 22:20 <@DanteAli> again - I am not the subject of attention here
  128. 22:20 <@DanteAli> it’s what the WINE devs based
  129. 22:20 <@DanteAli> as a reaction of what that guy did
  130. 22:20 <@DanteAli> so I’d appreciate if you could leave me out of it
  131. 22:20 < radius> I read the wikipedia article but here all I'm reading is your interpretation of that
  132. 22:20 < radius> I haven't had the chance of talking to them
  133. 22:21 <@DanteAli> I knew of the controversies surrounding Cedega for years
  134. 22:21 <@DanteAli> it’s not as if I just read up on that a day ago or so
  135. 22:21 <@DanteAli> where there is smoke there is fire
  136. 22:21 <@DanteAli> and there are lots of people pissed off about what he did for decades
  137. 22:21 <@DanteAli> you can conveniently overlook that all you want
  138. 22:21 <@DanteAli> I tend to err on the side of caution and go ‘hmm where there is smoke there must be fire'
  139. 22:25 < Alcaro> so many people seem to exclude the wishes of open source software authors from their moral compass, caring only about the exact license
  140. 22:26 < radius> we all draw lines in the sand
  141. 22:26 < radius> we justify pirating games
  142. 22:26 < radius> businessmen justify using free software as if it was free
  143. 22:26 < Alcaro> hm, that's a valid argument.
  144. 22:27 <@DanteAli> ‘we justify pirating games’ - pirating is the only means of preservation
  145. 22:27 <@DanteAli> it has been ever since the C64 era
  146. 22:27 <@DanteAli> otherwise they would have no roms to sell these days either
  147. 22:27 < Alcaro> that counts as justifying
  148. 22:27 < radius> :)
  149. 22:27 * orbea thinks respecting free licenses are more important than proprietary licenses taht don't respect the users, but yes, this is a justification
  150. 22:27 <@bparker> and ripping off free software is their only means of making money
  151. 22:27 <@DanteAli> every single employee at nvidia pirates shit
  152. 22:27 <@DanteAli> otherwise they wouldn’t be using our shit
  153. 22:27 <@DanteAli> so let’s get that bullshit out of the way
  154. 22:27 <@DanteAli> BTW
  155. 22:28 < radius> EVERY SINGLE ONE!
  156. 22:28 <@DanteAli> companies engage in illegal shit all the time
  157. 22:28 <@DanteAli> they steal every day left and right , doesn’t matter what it is
  158. 22:28 <@DanteAli> whether i’ts evading taxes
  159. 22:28 < radius> man, bob at the copy room (not into games) is a filthy pirate
  160. 22:28 <@DanteAli> or code espionage
  161. 22:28 < Tatsuya79> g-sync tries to pirate my wallet
  162. 22:28 < Juan> lol
  163. 22:28 < radius> :)
  164. 22:28 <@DanteAli> or what about promoting gambling now to kids?
  165. 22:28 <@DanteAli> that is bypassing many loopholes is it not?
  166. 22:29 <@DanteAli> so let’s not talk all this bullshit about who is legit and who isn't
  167. 22:29 < Alcaro> most things corps do is technically legal but morally bankrupt
  168. 22:29 <@DanteAli> what they are doing is not technically legal
  169. 22:29 <@DanteAli> it is as legal as tax evasion
  170. 22:29 < radius> that's doesn't mean that EVERY SINGLE EMPLOYEE ON EA wants to promote gambling
  171. 22:29 <@DanteAli> it is relying on loopholes in the law
  172. 22:29 <@DanteAli> and those loopholes don’t give you the excuse to do illegal acts
  173. 22:29 <@DanteAli> it’s a flaw in the system or law
  174. 22:29 <@DanteAli> they are exploiting
  175. 22:29 <@DanteAli> so that is the irony of all this - if you do this to their products
  176. 22:30 <@DanteAli> they call you a cheater
  177. 22:30 <@DanteAli> or an exploiter
  178. 22:30 <@DanteAli> but when they do it to the law
  179. 22:30 <@DanteAli> they justify and rationalize it to themselves
  180. 22:30 <@DanteAli> sorry but that is BS
  181. 22:30 <@DanteAli> they just want to have their cake and eat it
  182. 22:31 <@DanteAli> radius - their bosses do
  183. 22:31 <@DanteAli> and that is all taht counts
  184. 22:31 <@DanteAli> all the employees are whopping boys for their bosses
  185. 22:31 <@DanteAli> so whatever the EA head decides is corporate policy
  186. 22:31 <@DanteAli> and ther employees are just the foot soldier slaves working for their salaries
  187. 22:31 <@DanteAli> they don’t have any say in the matter
  188. 22:32 < Juan> Ye let's not work for anyone, who's up to getting some terrain countryside and planting our own turnips
  189. 22:32 <@DanteAli> anyway this is quite a useeless subject - I don’t even know what you are supposed to be arguing with me about
  190. 22:32 <@DanteAli> ‘we justify pirating games’ - actually, I have always maintained retroarch is not about emulation
  191. 22:32 <@DanteAli> so this doesn’t even fly
  192. 22:32 <@DanteAli> I have nothing to do with promoting warez or roms
  193. 22:33 <@DanteAli> but I am also not going to be full of shit about it either
  194. 22:33 < radius> who talked about promoting anyone
  195. 22:33 <@DanteAli> it’s just this ‘whataboutism’ that gets thrown back in yoru face
  196. 22:33 < radius> we as in people in this channel
  197. 22:33 < radius> end users
  198. 22:33 < orbea> i think you were right at this is a useless subject
  199. 22:33 < radius> of emulators
  200. 22:33 <@DanteAli> radius - as orbea says - I think it’s best to stop about this
  201. 22:33 <@DanteAli> this whole intellectual excursion is going nowhere
  202. 22:33 <@DanteAli> except for getting people into fights
  203. 22:33 <@DanteAli> over nothing important in particular
  204. 22:34 < frangarcj> Juan do know latest working PSP build?
  205. 22:34 <@DanteAli> this whole conversation isn’t going to change a damn or do a damn
  206. 22:34 <@DanteAli> so let’s leave it at that
  207.  
  208.  
  209. 22:49 <@DanteAli> inolen - I hope this is also not some childish crap where one having a difference of opinion on something makes one no longer able to talk to somebody
  210. 22:49 <@DanteAli> that would be so incredibly thin skinned right there
  211. 22:50 <@DanteAli> I have no reason to like your former boss, he never provided me with a paycheck, I’d say that makes me able to look at him more objectively than you maybe
  212. 22:50 <@DanteAli> who would maybe rationalize such things
  213. 22:50 <@DanteAli> all I do is reiterate what is said on the Internet based on the facts and evidence
  214. 22:51 <@DanteAli> if it is not in your boss’ former then that’s tough luck - he should work on his PR then
  215. 22:51 <@DanteAli> boss’ favor*
  216. 22:51 <@DanteAli> and maybe prevent the derision from getting to that stage
  217. 22:51 <@DanteAli> seems like that was never a priority for him - climbing up the corporate ladder was
  218. 22:51 <@DanteAli> which is fine but then don’t be in denial as to what one represents
  219. 22:52 < inolen> DanteAli: no, i'm just still working and i don't think there is much value in talking with you
  220. 22:52 <@DanteAli> ah some more nerd zingers
  221. 22:52 <@DanteAli> always nice those ones
  222. 22:52 <@DanteAli> so basically you’re butthurt now?
  223. 22:52 <@DanteAli> and are choosing to act disrespectful towards me now?
  224. 22:53 <@DanteAli> when I never treated you badly before?
  225. 22:53 < inolen> you literally make a product who's entire value depends on projects like mine, and yet you get personal and make cheap shots at me daring to make a few dollars myself
  226. 22:53 <@DanteAli> ‘depends on projects like mine'
  227. 22:53 <@DanteAli> like what?
  228. 22:53 <@DanteAli> redream?
  229. 22:53 <@DanteAli> I am appreciative of the fact there is a core - but let’s be brutally honest here - we are not an emulator project
  230. 22:53 <@DanteAli> we are an API/ecosystem project
  231. 22:54 <@DanteAli> also I didn’t make a cheap shot
  232. 22:54 <@DanteAli> what is ‘cheap shottish’ about saying something about a one-time fee?
  233. 22:54 <@DanteAli> if you feel ashamed of it because I mention it then whatever
  234. 22:54 <@DanteAli> I am not putting words into your mouth there
  235. 22:54 <@DanteAli> I didn’t say it was good or bad
  236. 22:54 <@bparker> orbea: that has nothing to do with anything
  237. 22:55 <@DanteAli> just saying that it’s evident which side of the fence you’re on these days
  238. 22:55 <@bparker> it's just a build failure
  239. 22:55 <@DanteAli> which would explain why you would maybe want to cape for that guy
  240. 22:55 <@DanteAli> your former boss that is
  241. 22:55 <@bparker> it still shouldn't have logs of a different recipe inside
  242. 22:55 <@DanteAli> I impart no value judgements on that
  243. 22:55 < inolen> "ashamed" lol. have fun in life man, keep burning bridges
  244. 22:55 -!- inolen <~inolen@> has left #retroarch ("WeeChat 1.9.1")
  245. 22:55 <@DanteAli> see this is the childishness right her
  246. 22:55 <@DanteAli> here*
  247. 22:55 <@DanteAli> they literally can’t read what you’re saying
  248. 22:55 <@DanteAli> I never said it was good or bad
  249. 22:55 < Juan> Yes you did
  250. 22:55 < Juan> Context
  251. 22:56 < radius> of course not! you brought it up because it was wonderful
  252. 22:56 < radius> we should replace the patreon with a $5 one time fee with this precedent
  253. 22:56 < radius> /sarcasm
  254. 22:56 <@DanteAli> why should he feel bad because I brought it up?
  255. 22:56 <@DanteAli> makes literally no sense
  256. 22:56 <@DanteAli> he should feel proud of it then
  257. 22:56 <@bparker> cause american snowflake
  258. 22:56 <@DanteAli> if you do something and then I bring it up
  259. 22:57 <@DanteAli> I am saying something bad
  260. 22:57 <@DanteAli> LOL
  261. 22:57 < radius> nah bparker it was a cheap shot indeed
  262. 22:57 <@DanteAli> not really
  263. 22:57 < radius> yeah you made it personal as ever
  264. 22:57 <@bparker> I didn't read the whole thing
  265. 22:57 <@DanteAli> that dude had been talking to me for weeks about how all emulators should be commercialized
  266. 22:57 <@DanteAli> it’s pretty apparent which side of the fence he is on
  267. 22:57 <@DanteAli> which is alright wiht me
  268. 22:57 < radius> you make far more of emulators than him
  269. 22:57 < radius> he probably sold 2
  270. 22:57 <@DanteAli> but then - don’t attack me over saying something about the guy behind cedega
  271. 22:57 <@DanteAli> or whatever
  272. 22:58 < radius> he said you were talking bs
  273. 22:58 <@DanteAli> this is the childish autistic nerds that work for these companies
  274. 22:58 < radius> which is probably right
  275. 22:58 <@DanteAli> they want to have their cake and eat it
  276. 22:58 <@bparker> oh snap
  277. 22:58 < Juan> He didn't attack you, you attacked the guy he actually knew
  278. 22:58 * bparker popcorn
  279. 22:58 <@DanteAli> Juan - I attacked nothing
  280. 22:58 < Juan> Sure
  281. 22:58 <@DanteAli> I reiterated what the wikipedia article stated
  282. 22:58 <@DanteAli> and what WINE devs stated
  283. 22:58 <@DanteAli> he should take it up with them instead
  284. 22:58 <@DanteAli> before getting to me
  285. 22:58 < radius> dude is a stunt driver, I guess we're all more nerdy than him
  286. 22:58 < Juan> You tell yourself whatever you want instead of owning up to your attitude
  287. 22:58 < Juan> D:
  288. 22:59 <@DanteAli> I have literally nothing to apologize for in this case
  289. 22:59 <@DanteAli> I have nothing to be appreciative of this guy’s former boss for
  290. 22:59 <@DanteAli> I am an impartial observer
  291. 22:59 < radius> lol
  292. 23:00 < orbea> bparker: probably this commit https://github.com/libretro/libretro-super/commit/69ee05f917234526f4fb9f20285b6af2ecca0f4d
  293. 23:00 < retrobot> Title: Merge pull request #611 from orbea/cleanup · libretro/libretro-super@69ee05f · GitHub
  294. 23:00 <@bparker> DanteAli: I think most people highly disagree with that last statement
  295. 23:01 <@DanteAli> too bad for them tehn
  296. 23:01 <@DanteAli> then*
  297. 23:02 <@DanteAli> I have also nothing to be in debted to nvidia for or their employees
  298. 23:02 <@DanteAli> they never did anything for us
  299. 23:02 <@DanteAli> what ‘bridges’ are there to burn?
  300. 23:02 <@DanteAli> what - some more devs they can poach?
  301. 23:02 <@DanteAli> yeah - great
  302. 23:02 <@DanteAli> such hep
  303. 23:03 <@DanteAli> help*
  304. 23:03 < vudiq> you both could just agree that you disagree and move on
  305. 23:03 <@DanteAli> I am perfectly willing to
  306. 23:03 <@DanteAli> problem is
  307. 23:03 <@DanteAli> this dude inolen is too childish for that
  308. 23:03 < vudiq> and stop beating the dead horse
  309. 23:03 <@DanteAli> he had to do the typical autist ‘leaving now because you said one bad word’ thing
  310. 23:04 <@DanteAli> these people can’t deal with people in real-lif
  311. 23:04 <@DanteAli> life*
  312. 23:04 <@DanteAli> you have to say all the nice code words and talk to them
  313. 23:04 <@DanteAli> as if you are buttering them up
  314. 23:04 <@DanteAli> and the minute you get off-script and tell them something in unfiltered fashion
  315. 23:04 < radius> children actually keep going at it until they are made to stop
  316. 23:04 <@DanteAli> they can’t handle it
  317. 23:05 <@DanteAli> as for the one-time fee
  318. 23:05 < radius> but alas, I don't care bout this argument, I think you making it personal breaks lots of relationships with other devs, and then you want to rally for support, but yeah it's your project do whatever you want, we all should do whatever we want
  319. 23:05 <@DanteAli> I have zero issue with it until he would add it to the libretro core
  320. 23:05 <@DanteAli> if he were to add it to the libretro core
  321. 23:05 <@DanteAli> I think that would be unacceptable and I’d fork it the
  322. 23:05 <@DanteAli> then*
  323. 23:05 <@DanteAli> beyond that
  324. 23:05 <@DanteAli> if that doesn’t happen - I have no issue with it
  325. 23:05 <@DanteAli> radius - I might have made it persona
  326. 23:05 <@DanteAli> personal*
  327. 23:05 <@DanteAli> regardless
  328. 23:05 <@DanteAli> it was one line
  329. 23:06 <@DanteAli> that he could have easily overlooked
  330. 23:06 <@DanteAli> in the heat of the moment
  331. 23:06 <@DanteAli> I am willing to put up with a lot of abuse
  332. 23:06 * radius hums, "dun dun dun another one bites the dust"
  333. 23:06 <@DanteAli> I continually have to overlook things
  334. 23:06 <@DanteAli> radius - dude, this guy’s dreamcast emu will take decades until it can even measure up to reicast
  335. 23:06 <@DanteAli> he knows nothing about the GPU
  336. 23:06 <@DanteAli> it’s a total dead end
  337. 23:06 <@DanteAli> and now even asking for one-time fees and whatnot
  338. 23:06 <@DanteAli> yeah - such a great loss
  339. 23:07 <@DanteAli> sorry but I’m sick and tired of all this self-sabotage going on in DC emu land
  340. 23:07 <@DanteAli> nobody knows what they are doing and the reluctance to cash in is higher than their ability to actually get something compettiive in people’s hands
  341. 23:07 <@DanteAli> RCPS3 already emulates the PS3 better than both DC opensource emus do
  342. 23:07 <@DanteAli> it’s laugahble
  343. 23:07 <@DanteAli> lauhable*
  344. 23:07 <@DanteAli> laughable*
  345. 23:13 <@DanteAli> anyway I’m willing to take that line back if it means restoring potential damaged relations
  346. 23:14 <@DanteAli> somebody contact inolen in PM and ask him if he would want to reconsider
  347. 23:14 <@DanteAli> he should at least be enough of a grownup about it that we can talk about it
  348. 23:14 <@DanteAli> getting really tired of all these guys acting like kids
  349. 23:14 <@DanteAli> can’t handle one line
  350. 23:14 <@DanteAli> I don’t need to like any of their coworkers or their bosses - I don’t have a contract I signed that says I am supposed to like them
  351. 23:15 <@DanteAli> and when you try to PM these guys to try to resolve a situation they don’t respond either - typical chidish autist move
  352. 23:15 < vudiq> he takes it personal because you were talking about a person he knows
  353. 23:15 <@DanteAli> can’t deal with ‘words’ so they retreat into the corner
  354. 23:15 <@DanteAli> vudiq - meh - act like an adult
  355. 23:15 <@DanteAli> I based what I said on what I read from various sources
  356. 23:16 <@DanteAli> his ‘friend’ is somebody in the public limelight
  357. 23:16 <@DanteAli> people will have opinions about him
  358. 23:16 <@DanteAli> based on what he did
  359. 23:16 <@DanteAli> just as they do about me
  360. 23:16 <@DanteAli> I deal with it on a daily basis
  361. 23:16 < orbea> i'd give it some time, no need to force anything
  362. 23:16 <@DanteAli> so should he
  363. 23:16 <@DanteAli> orbea - meh - knowing these guys it’s a lifelong grudge now
  364. 23:16 <@DanteAli> that ’s how ‘rational’ they all are
  365. 23:16 < orbea> hopefully not
  366. 23:16 < orbea> that would be silly
  367. 23:16 <@DanteAli> they are still intellectually 8+ years old of age
  368. 23:17 <@DanteAli> if these are the ‘alies’ we are supposed to win in this 'scene'
  369. 23:17 <@DanteAli> then this entire scene is a waste of time
  370. 23:17 <@DanteAli> and we’d be better off doing something else
  371. 23:17 < Juan> You are still ranting about him ffs
  372. 23:17 <@DanteAli> don’t have time to overindulge some petty guys’ egos working for random Valley companies
  373. 23:17 <@DanteAli> don’t have time for that BS
  374. 23:17 <@DanteAli> I can tell you that pretty much
  375. 23:17 < Juan> How circle jerk can this get is baffling
  376. 23:17 < vudiq> yes, you are right DanteAli. these days people disqualify you just because you have different opinion
  377. 23:18 <@DanteAli> pretty much what happened here
  378. 23:18 <@DanteAli> in any case - can’t help that
  379. 23:18 <@DanteAli> relationships based on that can not be considered relationships anyway
  380. 23:18 < vudiq> just move on, let it be
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement