Advertisement
Lesta

5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 0105 +PREPARE 4 STORMS

Jan 16th, 2016
28
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.29 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 0105 +PREPARE 4 STORMS
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUe4ILZqJLM&lc=z13yirni2tbbv3xkl23rdr4axwahhhicb
  3. https://pastebin.com/3pY9Wupy
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +PREPARE 4 STORMS __ *The first half of your answer shows you have understood this video and given all the hate I'm receiving it is a relief!* Thank you!
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12. As for WHAT the bright light is that whizzes past according to an Internet timetable - that is not so easy to say.
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17. Before we can call it a drone or anything else *we first need to get a genuine image of it that can discern actual details.*
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. So far every person who has claimed to have done so has turned out to be a liar and so with my next video I'm going to ask someone who is "trusted as an expert" on YouTube to supply me with some footage that actually makes out details.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. Let's get to the bottom of this because it is starring to seem a lot like a modern mythical equivalent of "Big Foot" photos where yes - really - they can ALL be fakes!
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Even if there were a real and manned magic floating centabillion dollar super serious micro/zero gravity research facility the "ISS" would be a very difficult thing to photograph with discernible details. *And that alone is what makes it such a magnet for charlatans and attention seekers who say, _"I took a photo of it with details!"_* Whether it's for the clicks, views, attention, respect, lols or dollars that undeniably that seems to be the case.
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. So I'll be asking an "expert" (Reds Rhetoric) to supply me with some footage that has details conforming to the alleged "ISS" that he himself personally vouches for as genuine and authentic etc.
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. Let's get to the bottom of this because I see otherwise good people trying to do the right thing but are falling for the tricks of con-artists all because they are belief controlled and can only view ALL of the "ISS from Earth" footage as real while seemingly oblivious to the fact upon scrutiny everything appears to be fake which is probably because *it is much easier to fake it than to do what would otherwise be required* [provided it's even possible in the first place]).
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45. If there are any genuine images with details I've not yet seen any and the fakes are definitely giving the real images (if they even exist - which it sure seems they don't) a bad name.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement