Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- “Still, even this possibility is short-circuited by a further aspect of
- Converse’s argument. What arrests Friedman most about Converse’s
- 1964 article is evidence not of the widespread political ignorance of the
- mass public—which only confirmed longstanding data to the same
- effect—but evidence of the distortions caused by the ideological lenses
- through which political information tends to be viewed by political elites.
- Converse shows that while the masses are “innocent” of ideology, elites
- are “constrained” by it—because it is such a valuable heuristic for under-
- standing politics. “The heuristic role of ideology suggests that even rela-
- tively knowledgeable elites are still ignorant, since they cannot judge the
- adequacy of their worldviews without abandoning ideology for an unat-
- tainable, universal expertise” (Friedman 1998 , 405 ).”
- Patrick J. Deneen (2008) A DIFFERENT KIND OF DEMOCRATIC COMPETENCE:
- CITIZENSHIP AND DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITY, Critical Review, 20:1-2, 57-74, DOI:
- 10.1080/08913810802316340
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement