yep...and you made yourself look like a moron, just as expected. you dont even know how vanishing point works. you realize that the vanishing point is a theoretical point at an infinite distance away right?

and you understand that for vanishing point to make any sense the sun would have to keep getting smaller and smaller as it approaches the horizon right?

To avoid the problem of glare lets use the moon as an example; and i challenge you to a very basic experiment also.

step 1, wait for a full moon.
step 2, take a camera and zoom all the way in on the moon as soon as it comes above the horizon. take a picture.
step 3, wait 5-6 hours untill the moon is high in the sky any take another picture at max zoom. take another picture.
step 4, take those 2 images and measure how wide the moon is in each one

you will find they are the same size, therefore, the effect of perspective is insignificant.

as you can see here, the sun is not getting smaller:
http://www.hoydalsvik.net/astrofoto/sun/sunset_20101201.jpg

that's because it's not getting any further away. we're just spinning.

Also, if you understand perspective, you would know that the closer the sun got to the horizon, the slower it would move across the sky. but alas...the sun is always moving at a constant 15° per hour so at high noon, the sun is moving at the same angular speed as it is when it's setting.

http://tube.geogebra.org/student/2141849

Quit being stupid and use your brain for once.
perspective is a pathetic explanation that only creates more problems for flat earth.

this is what the motion of the sun and moon would look like in the flat earth model (notice how no flat earther has ever done this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uexZbunD7Jg

 "Just look at my vids to see the sun getting smaller and smaller."

do you know what glare is?
are you stupid?
this is glare...it makes the sun look WAY bigger than it is.
https://rlilly.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/imag0367.jpg

if you use the proper exposure you dont have that problem, as shown here:
 http://www.hoydalsvik.net/astrofoto/sun/sunset_20101201.jpg

this is what it should look like to fit the flat earth model:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uexZbunD7Jg

oh ya, and your example of perspective does not explain this either:
https://rlilly.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/imag0367.jpg

there is no reason, using your explanation, that you should not see the bottom half of that tower. That is the part of the building closest to you. Vanishing point is the point where something becomes so small you can no longer see it. that building is clearly still big enough to see.

The ONLY reasonable explanation is that the surface of the earth is actually higher than the base of the building from the vantage point of the observer in order to block the line of sight. A spherical earth explains that picture perfectly.
Show less