JaysonSunshine

Mental clarity and evidence in a community of Trump

Feb 21st, 2020
620
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 11.80 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. treefiddy
  3. deep state intelligence officials are fabricating evidence that russia is trying to help trump win in november. sad.
  4. 18:30 infspire
  5. pilgrimmm: Which city in Japan is under voluntary quarantine?
  6. pilgrimmm
  7. I forget, I heard something on CNA
  8. 18:31 infspire
  9. Okay.
  10. infspire
  11. I can't find any corroborating evidence.
  12. 18:31 infspire
  13. treefiddy: Did Russia interfere in the 2016 US election?
  14. pilgrimmm
  15. well I know there is also one in Korea
  16. 18:32 apostrope has left IRC (Quit: Page closed)
  17. pilgrimmm
  18. Hillary did
  19. pilgrimmm
  20. so did Obama
  21. pilgrimmm
  22. 2016 was a dirty tricks primer
  23. pilgrimmm
  24. but Trump won anyway
  25. infspire
  26. pilgrimmm: Did Russia interfere in the 2016 US election?
  27. jayk
  28. ;o
  29. Stands has joined ([email protected])
  30. DoctorJ has joined ([email protected])
  31. treefiddy
  32. infspire: yep
  33. Ekko has changed mode: +vv Stands DoctorJ
  34. infspire
  35. treefiddy: Okay.
  36. infspire
  37. treefiddy: On what basis do you think the US Intelligence Community is fabricating evidence?
  38. treefiddy
  39. infspire: Trump said so
  40. infspire
  41. Trump is not a valid source of knoweldge.
  42. treefiddy
  43. infspire: he's the head of the executive branch to which the ODNI reports
  44. infspire
  45. He has lied 16,241 times from his inauguration until 2020 Jan 21.
  46. infspire
  47. treefiddy: Agreed.
  48. infspire
  49. He's also a pernicious liar.
  50. treefiddy
  51. infspire: wrong word
  52. infspire
  53. Which word?
  54. treefiddy
  55. infspire: I think you mean pathological, not pernicious
  56. infspire
  57. Pathological also works.
  58. infspire
  59. I meant pernicious.
  60. DoctorJ
  61. Both words seem fine to me.
  62. treefiddy
  63. infspire: pernicious doesn't
  64. infspire
  65. It does.
  66. infspire
  67. pernicious: "having a harmful effect, especially in a gradual or subtle way."
  68. DoctorJ
  69. n
  70. Stands is now known as Standards
  71. DoctorJ
  72. Nothing gradual or subtle about it. Other than that, seems fine.
  73. infspire
  74. DoctorJ: Yes, I don't mean gradual or subtle.
  75. treefiddy
  76. Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest -and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure,it’s not your fault.
  77. treefiddy
  78. DoctorJ: that's exactly right
  79. treefiddy
  80. pernicious is a bad word
  81. infspire
  82. Donald Trump is probably the most frequent liar in the history of public officials in the American republic.
  83. infspire
  84. He lies so often that it is correct to assume everything he says is a lie until shown otherwise by independent, third-party sources.
  85. infspire
  86. That is, not only do I not consider him a valid source for anything, I assume the opposite of everything he claims.
  87. treefiddy
  88. infspire: that's stupid
  89. DoctorJ
  90. What would be more appropriate than 'pernicious'? Maybe 'relentless'
  91. infspire
  92. treefiddy: It is the correct conclusion applying Bayesian inference to him.
  93. treefiddy
  94. infspire: if he lied consistently he'd be reliable
  95. treefiddy
  96. no it's not
  97. Galactic has joined ([email protected])
  98. infspire
  99. treefiddy: He is a reliable liar.
  100. treefiddy
  101. if you were able to assume the opposite of what he said is true all the time, he would be reliable
  102. infspire
  103. You can count on almost everything he says being a lie.
  104. treefiddy
  105. as good as an honest person
  106. treefiddy
  107. he is not a reliable liar, that's the point
  108. Ekko has changed mode: +v Galactic
  109. infspire
  110. treefiddy: He is reliable -- he is a reliable liar.
  111. treefiddy
  112. he is not a reliable liar, that's the point
  113. treefiddy
  114. he does not lie 100% of the time
  115. DoctorJ
  116. You can rely on the fact that he's lying. You can't rely on the lies themselves. An important distinction.
  117. pilgrimmm
  118. "You can keep your doctor" was certainly truthful
  119. infspire
  120. He does not lie 100% of the time. 100% of the time is not the definition of reliable.
  121. treefiddy
  122. if he told the opposite of the truth all of the time, he would be as good as honest
  123. treefiddy
  124. it is
  125. infspire
  126. False.
  127. treefiddy
  128. think about it please
  129. treefiddy
  130. if someone says the opposite of the truth 100% of the time, and that fact is known, then the truth can be determined with 100% reliability
  131. pilgrimmm
  132. ritualreb problem is most maps are made in CHINA
  133. infspire
  134. That would follow, treefiddy.
  135. pilgrimmm
  136. and follow the Chinese dialectic
  137. treefiddy
  138. QED.
  139. infspire
  140. That is not my claim.
  141. infspire
  142. My claim is that he lies very often, as demonstrated by the record. You can have high confidence the next thing he says, before you hear it, is a lie, therefore. There are many ways to lie such that the opposite is not the truth.
  143. infspire
  144. Lie does not mean 'opposite of the truth'. It means 'not true'.
  145. infspire
  146. This is relevant when you have none binary variables.
  147. treefiddy
  148. <+infspire> That is, not only do I not consider him a valid source for anything, I assume the opposite of everything he claims.
  149. treefiddy
  150. your words
  151. infspire
  152. If truth, for example, is the correct valuable of a variable with a range in the interval [0, 1], then a lie is anything 'reasonably' far from the true parameter value.
  153. pilgrimmm
  154. look, I like Trump. Bombast? Yep, braggart? definitely, but unlike the crop of morons we have had for the last oh half century, he gets results
  155. infspire
  156. There's no notion of 'opposite' for such a variable, however.
  157. treefiddy
  158. what results?
  159. pilgrimmm
  160. my portfolio is doing fine
  161. treefiddy
  162. because of low interest rates and a republican tax cut plan
  163. treefiddy
  164. nothing to do with trump
  165. treefiddy
  166. next
  167. infspire
  168. treefiddy: For many of his claims, I already possess independent, third-party knowledge. Since he is an invalid source, his statements do not move my beliefs whatsoever on these topics.
  169. pilgrimmm
  170. raylay :)
  171. DoctorJ
  172. And here I was thinking that the idiot in the white house did no good for us at all. We can have this very sophisticated epistemological discussion thanks to his propensity for bullshit. MAGA!
  173. pilgrimmm
  174. Trump leads the Republican. Like ot or not that is truth
  175. infspire
  176. treefiddy: For some of his claims, I have very little to no knowledge, e.g. the specific details the DNI relayed to Congress about Russia working in the 2020 election to re-elect Donald Trump.
  177. treefiddy
  178. infspire: ok
  179. infspire
  180. For these issues, I assume the truth is the opposite of what Donald Trump says.
  181. infspire
  182. That is, until I receive third-party, independent sources, at which point my beliefs move towards the weighted average of those sources.
  183. pilgrimmm
  184. Like I said, I like Trump. and, given the last choice, it was no contest
  185. infspire
  186. Where the weighting function is a meta-learning task that iteratively attempts to estimate the reliability of each of those sources.
  187. treefiddy
  188. fair enough but the republican party should replace trump
  189. infspire
  190. Yes, they should.
  191. treefiddy
  192. he's a mess
  193. DoctorJ
  194. More? How much more corruption can we take from Barr?
  195. pilgrimmm
  196. <shrug> personally I do not give a rats ass what your opinion is and DoctorJ is close to a -v again
  197. infspire
  198. As most senior GOP leaders stated in 2016, Trump was the end of the GOP.
  199. pilgrimmm has changed mode: -v DoctorJ
  200. pilgrimmm
  201. thats it
  202. treefiddy
  203. he's failed on immigration law reform, healthcare reform, inflated the national debt the unprecedented levels
  204. infspire
  205. I believe Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham both stated that in 2016.
  206. treefiddy
  207. he's a RINO
  208. infspire
  209. treefiddy: I disagree he's a RINO.
  210. treefiddy
  211. only thing he's done is stack the benches and that's thanks to mitch mcconnell
  212. asteroid has changed mode: +l 107
  213. infspire
  214. Trump is suffering from multiple, intense mental health disorders exacerbated by substantial stress and repeated drug use. All of that is combining so that he is expressing and performing the worst impulses of right-wing politiccs.
  215. Smaque has left IRC (Ping timeout: 745 seconds)
  216. infspire
  217. Left-wing politics also has very destructive impulses that we've seen in Soviet and Chinese communism, for example.
  218. infspire
  219. The GOP needs to recognize somebody they value is out of control and then need to reign in their impulses back to normal right-wing politics that are compatible with American republicanism.
  220. raylay has left IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
  221. pilgrimmm
  222. I am glad you are a qualified doctor who has personally diagnosed Trump after a consult. What> you are a TV Doctor who spreads crap? ah
  223. infspire
  224. All evidence indicates they're not going to do this voluntarily, however.
  225. infspire
  226. pilgrimmm: Did Russia interfere in the 2016 US election?
  227. laburd
  228. infspire: your concern trolling is pretty uninspiring
  229. pilgrimmm
  230. hardly
  231. infspire
  232. Okay, thank you for sharing your position.
  233. treefiddy
  234. thousands of qualified psychiatrists have diagnosed trump is multiple personality disorders
  235. infspire
  236. Correct.
  237. treefiddy
  238. https://dangerouscase.org/
  239. laburd
  240. infspire: I hope for your sake you're getting some of those bloomberg bucks
  241. infspire
  242. Furthermore, many of those psychiatrists have stated there is more evidence upon which to diagnosis Trump than is typical in the typical one-on-one setting.
  243. infspire
  244. laburd: Bloomberg is an unethical moron.
  245. infspire
  246. Anybody who supports him is an enemy of the republic.
  247. laburd
  248. yet more evidence that psychiatry is a pseudo science
  249. treefiddy
  250. ritualreb happens routinely
  251. laburd
  252. it's malpractice to diagnose someone without sitting down with them as their doctor
  253. treefiddy
  254. ritualreb psychiatrists have more material from which to study donald trump than any of their patients
  255. infspire
  256. Correct.
  257. treefiddy
  258. ritualreb yes routinely there's a function for that within the CIA
  259. infspire
  260. laburd: I disagree.
  261. infspire
  262. There are multiple, competing goals within the field of psychiatry.
  263. infspire
  264. The traditional goals are intimate and deeply connected to patients' rights and privacy.
  265. laburd
  266. infspire: I'm going to go ahead and put you on ignore. No offense buddy. Priv msg me if bloomberg needs more paid help
  267. DoctorJ has left IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
  268. treefiddy
  269. ritualreb https://www.salon.com/2019/12/02/former-cia-profiler-jerrold-post-on-donald-trumps-dangerous-charisma/
  270. infspire
  271. Another critical goal of psychiatry is to present to the public and our governing bodies the most up-to-date scientific knowledge on the functioning of the minds of our leaders, especially when there is substantial evidence they're not well.
  272. infspire
  273. laburd: Goodbye.
  274. treefiddy
  275. Dr. Jerrold Post is the founding director of the CIA’s Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior. As the CIA’s head psychological profiler, he served under five American presidents of both political parties. Following his 21 years of service with the CIA, Post became a professor of psychiatry, political psychology and international affairs at George Washington University.
  276. treefiddy
  277. the CIA’s Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior submits profiles on world leaders such as Kim Jong Un to the president so they can be informed in their dealings with them
  278. infspire
  279. Again, there is more evidence upon which to diagnose Trump than there is for the standard diagnosis environment of a psychiatrist meeting with a patient for a few sessions.
  280. treefiddy
  281. they've never met these people yet have access to vast amounts of biographical material, third-party accounts, video and audio
  282. treefiddy
  283. that's plenty upon which to make a diagnosis
  284. infspire
  285. There are literally tens of thousand of hours of footage of Trump over long periods of time upon which one can establish a baseline through the 80s, 90s, 00s, the 2015/16 presidential run, and his presidency from 2017-2020.
  286. treefiddy
  287. far more information than one gets in an in-person session
  288. treefiddy
  289. sorry to burst your bubble
  290. infspire
  291. treefiddy: My initial perception of you seems wrong. :)
  292. treefiddy
  293. infspire: no shit
  294. treefiddy
  295. infspire: I was being sarcastic
  296. treefiddy
  297. must be
  298. infspire
  299. It is quite difficult to assess sarcasm on the internet without a baseline.
  300. infspire
  301. See, Poe's Law.
  302. treefiddy
  303. <+treefiddy> deep state intelligence officials are fabricating evidence that russia is trying to help trump win in november. sad.
  304. pilgrimmm has changed mode: -v infspire
  305. treefiddy
  306. the leading sad should have given it away
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment