Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jun 21st, 2016
161
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.97 KB | None | 0 0
  1. And I have explained to you countless times why I refused to address more than the first point you made there. Because it's impossible to make you admit you are wrong about anything even when you say the stupidest shit ever. So why waste effort addressing everything when you will not even own up to the very first thing you said before wrong.
  2.  
  3. ON TOP OF THAT. You refuse to address countless things people have said to you. Literally countless. It's been going on for so long. It's hilarious how pathetic and hypocritical you are. Because you always refuse to answer people, then you throw a tantrum and cry like a bitch when people do it to you.
  4.  
  5. Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 5:46 PM
  6. From: "Ember McLain" <aa0ee6a_55f3_44f3@yahoo.com>
  7. To: "lexex lexex" <lexex@mail.com>
  8. Subject: Re: Good.
  9. My friend, the reason I ignore you is because you still haven't responded to my original essay months ago.
  10.  
  11. You sent be a ling to some blog, I responded, and then you said "I disagree with your first sentence so I'm not even going to respond." You then went on to say you've typed your response, but won't link it to me.
  12.  
  13. There is no reason for us to continue our discussion given your actions hitherto.
  14.  
  15. Good day.
  16.  
  17.  
  18. On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:59 PM, lexex lexex <lexex@mail.com> wrote:
  19.  
  20. Noticed you are spamming crack again. Don't you ever get sick of being a subhuman shithead?
  21.  
  22. Also, serious question, why should I answer anything you ask when you refuse to answer anything people say so you? Leaving aside how you want pointless unprovable information.
  23.  
  24. Seriously, just fucking die. You have no reason to be alive, and you're not smart enough to ever amount to anything.
  25.  
  26. Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 at 3:30 AM
  27. From: "Ember McLain" <aa0ee6a_55f3_44f3@yahoo.com>
  28. To: "lexex lexex" <lexex@mail.com>
  29. Subject: Re: Good.
  30. When you went to school did you have an IEP?
  31.  
  32. Serious question.
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:19 AM, lexex lexex <lexex@mail.com> wrote:
  37.  
  38. >Prove one piece of evidence
  39. Nice stupid parsing and shit English.
  40.  
  41. And you've already been given evidence many times. You've been shown the process and reasoning used to reach the conclsuion "crack is negative value", and literally the only thing you did was ignore it. So go back and read this string of emails again, which we both know you will not do.
  42.  
  43. Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 11:27 AM
  44. From: "Ember McLain" <aa0ee6a_55f3_44f3@yahoo.com>
  45. To: "lexex lexex" <lexex@mail.com>
  46. Subject: Re: Good.
  47. >Crack is bad because it's factually something that has negative value, not because of what anyone one person thinks.
  48.  
  49. Prove one piece of evidence that quantifiably proves this statement.
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. On Monday, May 23, 2016 11:51 AM, lexex lexex <lexex@mail.com> wrote:
  55.  
  56. Why are you being so retarded. Your "argument" in literally the previous reply was "The majority of the community supports crack. You've lost". Or, to phrase it the way you just did.
  57.  
  58. >everyone lines it
  59. >therefore it's good
  60.  
  61. Again, you're so fucking dumb. But you don't care about being smart, you just care about attacking people.
  62. Crack is bad because it's factually something that has negative value, not because of what anyone one person thinks.
  63.  
  64. Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 10:20 AM
  65. From: "Ember McLain" <aa0ee6a_55f3_44f3@yahoo.com>
  66. To: "lexex lexex" <lexex@mail.com>
  67. Subject: Re: Good.
  68. >not a lot of people like it
  69. >therefore it's bad
  70.  
  71. You literally operate at the level of a middle school child.
  72.  
  73.  
  74. On Saturday, May 21, 2016 5:57 PM, lexex lexex <lexex@mail.com> wrote:
  75.  
  76. Go to pixiv. Search all the ship tags for Madoka. See how crack isn't even close to a faction of the canon pairs.
  77.  
  78. >but da dur da dur I SAID the majority supports crack that means im right
  79. >oh, and I samefagged some too
  80.  
  81. The only thing that's lost here is your integrity and your brain. Because like you have been told many times before, it literally does not matter at all who supports what, because what is factually right and wrong is not based on majority.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement