Unhappy_Dusk

+Espeon: Also have you seen the new direction cap is taking? I know you're no longer staff, but I thought you'd be itnerested.
@Rising_Dusk: New direction?
@Rising_Dusk: I've seen nothing in the CAP forum suggesting that.
+Espeon: I'll have to go find it
+Espeon: one second.
@Rising_Dusk: Oh, I see it now.
@Rising_Dusk: EW
@Rising_Dusk: EW
@Rising_Dusk: EW
@Rising_Dusk: Ugh, leave it to tennis to fuck so many things up at once.
+Espeon: It's not all bad.
+Espeon: It's very, very different, yeah. But it's not all bad.
@Rising_Dusk: I don't think you understand what CAP stands for.
@Rising_Dusk: And why these changes go against all of that.
@Rising_Dusk: "The next change that will be taking place is CAP Pokemon will be made for the CAP Metagame, not the OU metagame."
@Rising_Dusk: This very bit goes against the fundamental principle upon which CAP is founded.
+Espeon: No, I understand why these changes are so massive.
+Espeon: It was meant to create and test Pokemon for the OU metagame itself
+Espeon: But I'm saying we can still learn things from this metagame that we wouldn't otherwise.
@Rising_Dusk: We learn things that are irrelevant.
@Rising_Dusk: The CAP metagame is meaningless.
@Rising_Dusk: Learning something about it, is... Well, pointless.
@Rising_Dusk: It cannot be applied to the way we understand real Pokemon.
+Espeon: Well, you got me there.