Critical overview of satellite-based neurophysiological and environmental monitoring systems
This paper is a limited overview of satellite-based neurophysiological and environmental monitoring systems, technology operator techniques, and related concerns about health and privacy. This overview was informed by a team of 10 people with high-level experience using the equipment described herein. The operators ultimately describe themselves as researchers and claim to be employed by the Department of the Army or one of it’s contractors, but their roles more closely resemble signals intelligence analysts. Operators I communicated with work on rotating shifts of 3-5 people (40-60 hours per week) focusing on a single subject of interest (subject). They monitor a subject’s location, environment, communications, interpersonal interactions, diet, substance use, activity, and behavior. Their work is performed at a location remote from the subject, with a satellite mediating signals and communication between both parties. They author summary reports of subject activity from real-time observation sessions presented as sound, image, and data visualizations. They conduct subject interviews about knowledge, interests, and experiences for psychological profiles to understand and predict behavior/activity. Additionally, they structure scientific frameworks for human experimentation, mostly using stimuli/response testing facilitated by electromagnetic wave frequency modulation, voice commands, and environmental cues.
The technology operators I communicated with were secretive and regularly misrepresented their identities and capabilities from fear of legal repercussions. They demonstrated equipment functionality during the course of their operations and research, primarily communicating with me using the technology itself. In this overview there is some confusion as to whether or not neuroelectric activity monitoring is capable of capturing optic nerve activity and translating it to motion graphic representations of vision as described by operators. Operators alternately demonstrated thought reading abilities that describe visual environments with a high degree of accuracy. Operators attempted to demonstrate thought reading ability from various parts of the brain, including a subject’s ability to form sentences before typing them; they also attempted to demonstrate text translation and analysis of simple-to-complex “subconscious” thoughts. Operators regularly deceived their subject into believing they had thoughts that were not their own using subliminal messaging techniques. Overall, the behavior of operators was best characterized as obscene, with the technology facilitating their abusive activity. There is evidence similar operators have abused technology with subjects in the past that lead to suicide or violent outbreaks.
Components
Optoacoustic sensing and imaging technology using electromagnetic/ultrasonic wave generators installed on an orbiting satellite are used for:
neuroelectric activity monitoring,
environment and organism tomography,
audio transmission and recording, and
modulating neural activity.
Introduction
Satellite-based neurophysiological and environmental monitoring systems are being used by defense, security, research, and law enforcement agencies to gather signals intelligence data during the course of investigation and research. Operators analyze detailed information about their human subject including motion graphic representations of their vision, audio recordings of sound in their environment, and tomographic visualizations of their body and surrounding architecture/nature. Operators utilize audio transmitters that deliver barely audible (subliminal) sound perceivable without an electronic device and electromagnetic wave frequency transmitters that modulate neural activity. Signals intelligence is gathered while a subject is stationary or in motion, indoors or outdoors, and without apparent presence of the technology or its operators; signals are captured within an immediate periphery around a subject.
Science that drives neurophysiological monitoring technology as used by aforementioned industries is classified or top secret. Unclassified technologies with similar functionality, especially in the medical and consumer electronics industry, pale in comparison with regards to their capabilities. Discovering information about the nature and operations of classified technologies used by governments is not easy via regular investigation methods. Contributors to research and development of these technologies work under strict non-disclosure agreements where they may not share any information about their efforts with colleagues or competitors under threat of punishment. The technology is so advanced that upon learning details of its capabilities, the general public is in disbelief both that it is possible to gather signals intelligence as described herein and that a governing agency would use the technology as part of its work. Leaders in education and industry who are unfamiliar with the technology themselves can often not fathom how it is engineered or configured.
Capabilities
Neuroelectric signal sensors measure optical nerve activity and translate it to motion graphic representations of a subject’s vision. They capture optical stimuli with similar fidelity to a subject’s visual acuity showing the qualities of light (color and brightness) from natural and artificial sources, texture and decoration of surfaces, object and organism shape/form, environmental and architectural depth, and movement of elements through the environment. Limitations of a subject’s vision are reflected in the motion graphic presentations including focus and peripheral viewing range, nearsightedness/farsightedness/blindness, and lens obfuscation from facial skin/hair. Visual artifacts visible when a subject’s eyelids are closed, called phosphenes, are also visible to operators. The motion graphic representations of a subject’s vision are photo-realistic but not pixelated, more closely resembling vectorized digitizations of imagery.
Optoacoustic tomographic imaging of organisms has enough fidelity to penetrate human skin and visualize internal organs. Imaging techniques reveal food as it travels through the digestive system, some details about the musculoskeletal system, pain registered by the nervous system, and temperature of the skin surface. Operators are able to view their subject’s body, interior/exterior features of surrounding architecture, as well as other organisms in the observation periphery.
Operators communicate with subjects using satellite-based audio transmissions that are perceived as subliminal sound. In some cases a subject is aware they are receiving communications and can recognize voices or noises being transmitted by equipment operators from their remote location. In other cases a subject may not be aware they are receiving communications, but sound is processed by the brain nonetheless with unpredictable outcomes. When a subject is aware of receiving communications and following the content/direction of conversation between operators, or between operators and the subject themselves, they can return verbal messages facilitated by an optoacoustic microphone. The quality of transmitted communications varies based on the operators’ own voices, their console’s sound capture device, the transmitter hardware, certain environmental factors between the point of transmission origin and point of subject receipt, the subject’s sensitivity to electromagnetic frequencies, and the subject’s cognitive and interpersonal communication skills. The quality of received communications is high-definition enough to capture digestive system noises, tendon creaking, and a whispering voice from a subject while omitting other environmental noise outside the direct recording area.
Neural activity can be modulated using electromagnetic wave generators with adjustable frequency ranges. A subject that is sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies will experience changes or interruptions in neuroelectric activity that inspires involuntary actions. Electromagnetic frequencies affect motor activity in different parts of the body that can range from full muscle motion to partial muscle stimulation; they may also affect organ operations by eliciting autonomic responses. Transmitted frequencies are capable of eliciting: involuntary ocular muscle movement with a degree of accuracy that causes eyeballs to move left, right, up, and down as well as cross, diverge, and rotate in circles; involuntary sexual organ activity that causes ejaculatory muscle movement, blood flow around genitalia, and excitation; involuntary back, abdomen, and leg movement that interfere with walking gait while a subject is ambulatory; and sensations that resemble human emotions. Additionally, transmitted frequencies modulate neuroelectric activity that invoke responses in multiple muscles and organ systems when they are intended to target specific activity.
Criticism
Involuntary thoughts and actions
Satellite-based audio transmitters cause involuntary thoughts in the form of auditory hallucinations where a subject perceives sound with no discernable point of origin – such as a human speaker, electronics, machines, animals, or weather. This is distinguished from auditory hallucinations originating from a person’s brain, described as symptoms of schizophrenia or other mental illnesses. People rely on sound events from predictable or expected sources to orient themselves, maneuver through space, understand their environment, and communicate effectively. Auditory hallucinations from subliminal sound cause involuntary thoughts that interfere with cognitive ability and speech and may inspire involuntary actions.
When audible, subliminal sound could be described with corollaries familiar to people through the course of normal communications. At times it resembles conversation occurring 5, 10, 50, or 100 feet away or in nearby structure interiors. However, unlike normal voice communications at these distances where content and quality is distorted by wind or physical barriers, the content of subliminal messages can be persistent or contiguous instead of faint or disjointed. When inaudible, subliminal sound more closely resembles intrapersonal communication, dialogical self, subvocalization, or internal monologue.
Involuntary thoughts may direct cognition, distract from currently proceeding cognitive activity, or deform cognition to become something other than intended. This occurs with varying degrees of awareness or no awareness to people experiencing subliminal sound. This is also distinguished from mental illness symptoms, such as obsessive compulsive disorder, where one’s mind is distracted by predictable stimuli or intrapersonal thoughts.
Involuntary actions are series of motions and behaviors that amount to common activity comprised of coordinated muscle movement or organ function that are not intended by the person performing them. These are in response to verbal commands that are subliminal with varying or no degree of awareness; they are also in response to electromagnetic frequency transmissions that modulate neural activity.  Involuntary actions resemble intentional actions that range from simple to complex. Simple actions, for example, may include eye movement, tongue movement, and finger movement. Complex actions may include retrieving objects, satiating appetite, performing household/work functions, or satisfying human needs and desires. Simple involuntary actions are caused by electromagnetic wave frequency generators modulating neural activity. Complex involuntary actions are caused by involuntary thoughts inspired by subliminal messages from satellite-based audio transmitters. Like involuntary thoughts involuntary actions can be directed, distracted, or deformed through interference
Research and investigation applications
When neurophysiological monitoring systems are used for intelligence gathering, investigation, and research purposes they offer a limited perspective of a subject’s personality, beliefs, knowledge, behavior, actions, and intent. These characteristics of a subject are not measurable through neuroelectric activity, and there are limitations defining these qualities through observation, profiling, questioning, and stimuli/response testing. This leaves the weight of importance that can be assigned to information collected at lower levels than what the system itself and its agency or authority represents.
Neurophysiological monitoring systems do not represent a subject’s entire state of being, or even the environment surrounding them. During short-term observations, behavior and activity of a subject cannot be fully informed by the system or operating agency with a degree of accuracy that could determine or predict criminal intent. Long-term observations of a subject’s behavior and activity must be informed by ongoing observation, which itself has weighted value without traditional investigation or research methods and interpersonal communication. Even with ongoing observation combined with traditional methods, the monitoring systems provides a volume of information about a subject that is unmanageable if observers must identify relevant information from a stream of daily, minute-by-minute, life events. Continuous monitoring requires a team of people that must maintain enough fidelity in their methodology for consistency in reporting. Because of technological limitations of neurophysiological monitoring systems, and human limitations in methodology, the value of intelligence and investigation is relatively low.
Non-consensual human experimentation
Neurophysiological monitoring systems with satellite-based audio communication devices and electromagnetic frequency generators facilitate non-consensual human experimentation on unsuspecting subjects by authorities, equipment operators, and anonymous or unknowledgeable volunteers. Aspects of the subject’s neurophysiological data and profile are released to experiment coordinators with varying levels of knowledge about their subject. Agency authorities and equipment operators do not necessarily have a background or education in science as it relates to psychology, psychiatry, or experimentation frameworks. There are often no formal hypotheses, controls or variables to test against, and little to no accurate documentation of results in phases of experiments. Because the equipment is operated by defense, security, and law enforcement agencies there is no reasonable expectation that experiments, testing, and treatments will be effective. The technological limitations of the hardware/software mostly allow for stimuli/response experiments that rely on verbal response, visual focus, and demonstrations of cognitive changes exhibited through subject behavior as observed by operators and limited interpersonal interactions in the physical environment.
Auditory hallucinations that originate from human voices external to the subject’s mind and not identifiable in their physical environment, as well as electromagnetic frequency exposure, lead to involuntary thoughts and actions that resemble mental illness symptoms. When symptoms are observed, the operators or experiment coordinators may improperly diagnose the subject as having schizophrenia, multiple personalities, conversion disorder, or a behavioral disorder. This leads to testing and treatment techniques similar to group therapy, diversion therapy, speech therapy, social immersion therapy, and hypnosis/regression therapy. Therapy sessions are conducted primarily using subliminal messaging combined with environmental reinforcement and directed volunteer participation; therapy sessions are often improvisational and occur outside clinical settings. Cognitive functioning is also measured by operators and experiment coordinators or volunteers. It includes testing and conditioning around reasoning, memory, attention, visual acuity, visual continuity, social/environmental perception, and interpersonal communication skills. In all cases the system has limited value as a medical treatment device due to lack of clinical environment, finite interpersonal interaction, and technological limitations.
Health concerns
Neurophysiological monitoring equipment operators broadcasting messages and electromagnetic frequencies from satellite-based technologies into an environment with an unsuspecting audience has the ability to inspire involuntary thoughts and actions amongst people in the reception zone. This can lead to cognitive difficulty and bodily injury as people express symptoms of mental illness and physical ailments that last for the duration of exposure to subliminal transmissions; the symptoms of illness may persist after exposure. Depending on the duration of exposure (hours, days, weeks, months, or years) subliminal sound will cause long-term mental and physical health problems. Because the technology, its operators, and their techniques are secretive and because it is not possible to easily discover this information through available research methods, health care providers are not able to treat these medical symptoms. In some cases improper treatment for mental and physical problems may be applied, further complicating issues for the person experiencing them. It is also not possible for law enforcement agencies to properly investigate criminal activity related to technology and authority abuses.
Privacy concerns
Because it is possible to remotely analyze neurophysiological data perceived as vision and to capture environmental sound, there are no limits to where or when the data can be collected. Data can be collected in public and private dwelling spaces while someone is stationary or in motion. It is possible to capture sound from conversations as well as vision in the surrounding environment; it is possible to capture intimate sexual acts between unsuspecting people; it is possible to capture grooming, defecation, and urination as long as it is within viewing or hearing range of the person performing these acts. In business it is possible for operators to collect all visual and auditory information originating from office and meeting spaces. This allows sensitive information such as credentials (pincodes, usernames, and password), confidential documents, and verbally communicated information to be exploited and compromised. This can lead to industrial espionage and sabotage unbeknownst to a business person or their organization.
Because the technology digitizes signals for consumption through software installed on a computer console it is vulnerable to hacking by any number of criminal organizations or individuals. An operator’s computer console can be accessed remotely allowing unauthorized access to their workstation or activity in real-time; the contents of the software can be exported and stored, allowing access of sensitive data to hackers or curious third parties; and the software source code can be stolen, distributed, or reengineered to harness the hardware. Without proper security protocols any aspect of the technology’s functionality, operations, engineering, or capabilities can be shared through popular communication mediums including internet forums, data storage sites, portable storage mediums, or simple word of mouth.
Public hysteria
The awareness an observation subject has of monitoring activity sometimes leads to personal research efforts about the effects and activities related to both operators and their agency. Due to secrecy around these topics there are often little or no verifiable resources to substantiate their suspicions or claims. Many resources available on the internet include incomplete or misleading anecdotes from witnesses or subjects that have been victimized by the technology’s abuse. Most resources amount to conspiracy theories or personal recollections that resemble struggles with mental illness. Activity surrounding neurophysiological and environmental monitoring with audio transmitters/receivers and electromagnetic frequency generators have resulted in mass hysteria. This is apparent in the topic of “gangstalking” which has manifested its own vocabulary describing “target individuals” as observation subjects, “stasi” (East Germany secret police) as operators (researchers and investigators), “V2K” as satellite-based communication devices, “direct energy weapons” as electromagnetic frequency generators, “remote neural monitoring” as neurophysiological and environmental monitoring systems, and “satellite terrorism” as government security/defense operations.
Criminal behavior
Physical abuse
A group of operators elicited over 20,000 involuntary ocular, tongue, leg, and torso muscle movements during a period of over four months on a victim. This was done by modulating electromagnetic wave frequencies and issuing verbal commands directed at the victim. The involuntary ocular muscle movement was sometimes inflicted for consecutive hours, multiple times per minute, then during intermittent periods throughout the day. This occurred during wake and sleep, and when the victim was stationary and ambulatory. At times the operators caused involuntary ocular muscle movement when they observed their victim shifting visual focus or changing head and body position; other times the operators waited until the victim was in dangerous environments such as heavy vehicle traffic, navigating traffic intersections, or near elevated surface edges. The operators caused involuntary muscle movement while the victim was reading, writing, or merely observing their environment. The operators taunted their victim as they suffered.
The victim experienced symptoms of vertigo, disequilibrium, gait disorder, and conversion disorder. The subject experienced ocular muscle pain, leg muscle pain, foot muscle pain, and lower back pain. The mental and physical distress was experienced for the duration of involuntary muscle movement (often hours at a time), and for extended periods afterwards.
Sexual abuse
A group of operators caused over 1000 involuntary sexual responses in a victim that caused blood flow around and excitement to their sexual organs. This was done during a period of over 6 months, sometimes multiple times per day. This was accomplished by modulating electromagnetic wave frequencies and issuing verbal commands directed at the victim. Sometimes the sexual response was invoked during the victim’s state of sleep and they woke fully aroused. Sometimes the sexual response was invoked while the subject was in public, either ambulatory or stationary, causing sexual organ sensations or mild arousement. The operators taunted and humiliated their victim as they suffered.
Harassment
A group of operators communicated 10,000s of verbally abusive messages directed at a victim that resulted in noticeable behavioral changes including depression, irritability, and rage. The messages were delivered daily during a period of over 6 months, usually on a minute-by-minute basis for hours at a time. The victim received messages while ambulatory and stationary, sometimes while interacting with other people in public. The operators had high-level familiarity with their victim from daily monitoring including knowledge of life history, professional history, habits, personal interests, acquaintances, and family. They used this knowledge to dehumanize their victim and lower their sense of self-worth.
Invasion of privacy
A group of operators watched a victim urinating, defecating, grooming, and masturbating on 1000s of occasions during the course of 2 years. During a period of over 6 months the operators narrated the victim’s bathroom activity to the victim describing details about the color of their urine and feces, the quality of their feces wipe, remaining feces in their rectum and colon, and urine residue near the urethra. They also taunted the victim as they used bathroom.
Coercion
A group of operators communicated 10,000s of messages that intentionally and unintentionally distracted their victim under a series of circumstances that ultimately inspired symptoms of behavioral disorders and mental illnesses. This included sending subliminal messages during the course of interpersonal communications with intent to mutate words and sentences; sending subliminal messages during composition of written text with intent to direct content of messages; sending subliminal messages with intent to distract or deter from perceived undesirable activity; sending subliminal messages with intent to encourage violent behavior or reactions; sending subliminal messages with intent to induce stress, anxiety, and depression; and sending subliminal messages to inspire cravings for food and drink.
At one point, after being sexually and mentally abused daily, the victim attempted suicide against their stated will to live by attaching a noose around their neck and tying a plastic bag around their head. A group of operators taunted their victim during the suicide attempt, even repeating the phrase “sieg heil” during the victim’s breaths. The victim survived the suicide attempt only to be pressured into suicide on multiple occasions afterward, enduring operators’ wishes that their victim would kill themselves.

Impersonation
A group of operators impersonated personnel from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Army, Eugene Police Department, Salem Police Department, and Portland Police Bureau. They did so to impose authority over their victim and instill fear of criminal repercussions of activity they witnessed during observation sessions.