TL;DR: there were no homicidal gas chambers

A public debate between a mainstream holocaust scholar and any noteworthy revisionist will not and cannot happen if the lie is to continue, Germar Rudolf or any prominent revisionist would absolutely demolish the conventional narrative.

This is why.

Let's start with the short version
	⁃	Chemical analysis of walls of alleged homicidal gas chambers prove mass gassings did not take place.
	⁃	No traces of panic-proof doors to contain thousands of panicking victims.
	⁃	No means or devices to introduce and swiftly distribute cyanide gas or the much less effective Zyklon B.
	⁃	Insufficient ventilation systems in alleged homicidal gas chambers.
	⁃	Architectural design of crematoria. If their purpose for mass gassings the design would be absurd.
	⁃	Bletchley Decrypts (the British decryption efforts during WWII) make no mention of gassings or mass exterminations
The evidence isn’t there, the onus of proof is on the party making the claim. Every finding surrounding jewish internment calls the mass extermination claim into question. All the holocaust narrative amounts to can be summarized as unsupported and wildly inconsistent claims using jewish internment as the basis.


	•	muh six million
	◦	Many examples in media of the 6,000,000 million number in relation to jews PRIOR to the holocaust. This is not proof of anything in itself, but it does make the following points even more damning.
	•	Despite wildly inconsistent mainstream jewish death toll estimates, the 6 million figure has remained the same.
	◦	This suggests that the 6 million figure is symbolic rather than factual.
	◦	Census data does not indicate, let alone prove, the disappearance of 6 million jews.
	◦	Auschwitz death toll officially went down from roughly 4 million to 2 million to 1 million.
	◦	Madjenek death toll went down from 2 million at its first museum, to 1.5 million at Nuremberg, all the way to 78,000.
	◦	How can the death toll estimates be revised so far downwards yet the 6 million number remains the same?
	◦	Establishment historians have been revising the death toll estimates since the end of the war, yet ‘revisionists’ are blacklisted as ‘deniers’, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned for doing the same thing.
	•	The veracity of the ‘homicidal gas chambers’ claim is important…
	◦	…because ‘homicidal gas chambers’ were allegedly the primary means of killing Jews. most (almost 3 million) of the supposed 6 million dead jews were allegedly murdered this way. Nazis gassing jews is what a lot of people think about when the holocaust is mentioned: it’s the most important and consistently referenced method of execution in the holocaust narrative.
	•	Original vs. revised claims about nazi ‘extermination camps’
	◦	It is a known fact today that the horror scenarios of mass gassings — allegedly carried out with Zyklon B — in the concentration camps of the German Reich proper (eg. Dachau, Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen) were nothing other than utter lies, invented or at least supported by the western Allies until serious research debunked the story completely.
	◦	What reasons are there to not think that the identical or similar tales of mass gassings in the former Communist, dictatorial Eastern Bloc are also lies?
	◦	It was accepted for nearly 20 years that camps in Nazi Germany were used for mass gassings, but now it’s only camps in Poland that are believed to have been extermination camps? What caused the narrative shift in the 1960s? Why are the witness testimonies about mass gassings at some camps rejected as lies, but the witness testimonies about mass gassings at other camps outside the Reich proper accepted as truth?
	◦	All information about gas chambers came from the Soviet Union, as the Western Allies did not capture any camps that are currently said to have used gas chambers. There is no film footage of any death camps, the only camps which are claimed to be death camps today were captured by the Soviets, who didn't allow any film cameras into those sites.
	◦	Steven F. Pinter, a US War Department attorney who was stationed in at Dachau for 17 months after the war, confirms that “the Russians did not permit us [to investigate it].”
	◦	On what grounds should we trust the Soviet Union’s unsubstantiated claims about Nazi extermination camps and gas chambers?
	▪	These are the same soviets who lied about the Katyn massacre, which they committed but tried to blame on the Germans in 1943.
	▪	The same soviets who systematically starved up to 10 million Ukrainians to death in 1933 in the Holodomor.
	▪	The Soviets were invented several fake atrocities to demonize their enemies while committing many of their own, they are not exactly the most noble or reliable source.
	◦	The original claims about human soap and lampshades made of skin have been officially abandoned by the mainstream. What makes the claims about homicidal gas chambers any more believable? Why is it against the law to even attempt to revise other aspects of the narrative?
	•	Witness testimony
	◦	Establishment historians agree that “Documents relating to gassings in Poland are scant". Therefore, witness testimony and circumstantial evidence play a much larger role."
	◦	Look at how patently absurd much of the witness testimony is.
	▪	Victim testimony.
	▪	Confessions of the accused.
	▪	Germans were brutally tortured and otherwise coerced into giving confessions and other unreliable testimony.
	▪	Witnesses for the defense were threatened not to testify.
	◦	Clearly these witnesses aren't reliable and witnesses aren't infallible, especially when there is so much to gain by claiming victimhood. We must corroborate witness testimony with physical evidence.
	◦	Witness testimony is the least reliable evidence in a court of law. Physical and documentary evidence must take precedence.
	•	Post-war trials
	◦	A sick joke and an affront to justice.
	▪	Quotes from judges and others. even presiding judges, senators, congressmen, and lawyers at the time described the post-war trials as a disgrace.
	▪	Why was Stephen F. Pinter (US Military attorney) ignored?
	▪	Why was Dr. Charles Larson (forensic pathologist) ignored? Of the thousands of autopsies he performed, not a single person he looked at died from gas. Most of the deaths were from typhus.
	•	Since physical and documentary evidence must take precedence, and the ‘homicidal gas chambers’ were supposedly the primary means of killing jews, and the largest number of jews were supposedly killed in Auschwitz, that’s probably a good place to look:
	◦	Reality of the Auschwitz ‘death camp'.
	▪	Swimming pools, football matches, theatre, brothels, etc. If the plan was to gas 'em all, why provide such amenities?
	▪	If inmates were treated so badly in the alleged 'extermination camps’ and there really was a plan to exterminate the jews, why did Elie Weisel decide to flee with Germans instead of waiting for Russian liberators?
	▪	If the plan really was to kill all the jews, why were Nazi soldiers imprisoned, executed and otherwise punished for mistreating jews?
	◦	Physical impossibility of Auschwitz gas chambers
	▪	Germans renowned for their technical efficiency, but...
	▪	The architecture of the crematoria, if their purpose was for the gassing and cremating of jews, is absurd. Look at the building layout of Crema II and III. Gassing up to 2000 jews in a basement, then dragging the toxic bodies by hand across the hall into a 5-person elevator, taking the elevator upstairs, then dragging the bodies further to the ovens, lifting them up and tossing them in?
	▪	Why not use purpose built-machines to disperse gas like they used in the delousing chamber? The alleged method for the alleged homicidal gassings are ridiculously inefficient.
	▪	Flimsy wooden doors for homicidal gas chambers, which were meant to contain up to 2000 panicking jews?
	▪	Totally improper ventilation for homicidal gas chambers.
	▪	No holes for dispensing the Zyklon B.
	▪	No blue stains and only trace amounts of cyanide compounds in the walls of alleged homicidal gas chambers.
	▪	The cremation math makes no sense.
	▪	There’s absolutely no way a million bodies could have been cremated in those ovens.
	⁃	Absurd figures for the amount of time it took to cremate bodies. “15-20 minutes” lol
	▪	If the bodies were burned in piles/pits outdoors instead, then why doesn’t any of it show up in the air photo evidence? We’re talking about over a million bodies here. Think about how much space 50,000 people take up in a sports arena and multiply that by 20.
	▪	Bletchley Decrypts make no mention of gassings or mass exterminations
	•	Final solution
	◦	“final solution” was about a final TERRITORIAL solution for the jews. It didn’t mean gassing them all. Leading zionist, Israel Zangwill, was talking about a (territorial) “final solution of the Jewish question” as early as 1912. Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, was talking about a “solution to the Jewish Question” as early as 1896.
	◦	If the plan really was to kill all the jews, why were Nazi soldiers imprisoned, executed and otherwise punished for mistreating jews?