API tools faq
paste
gho_research

Adoption bill puts birth parents at risk

gho_research
Jul 5th, 2018
194
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.24 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. ***This article was purchased for $2.75 from Star Tribune Archives. It appears no author is listed...lol! *****
  2. Published: March 7, 2008
  3. Edition: METRO
  4. Section: NEWS
  5. Page#: 12A
  6.  
  7. Adoption bill puts birth parents at risk
  8. Legislation would give adoptees access to birth records.
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13. Should adoptees have access to their original birth records, allowing them to identify birth parents without their consent?
  14.  
  15.  
  16. A bill before the state Legislature would give some adoptees access to their original birth certificates, essentially elevating the interests of adoptees above those of birth parents who requested anonymity.
  17. Changing the rules decades after the fact seems unfair, but state rules should balance the rights of all parties by helping adoptees get access to valuable health data without compromising privacy.
  18. Since 1982, birth parents in Minnesota who choose to give up a child for adoption have been required to fill out an affidavit either allowing or preventing the disclosure of their identities at the request of the child, once that child has reached adulthood. In that time, about one in 10 birth parents have opted to prevent disclosure, according to the Minnesota Coalition for Adoption Reform, which is promoting the "open records" change in adoption law.
  19. The proposal would apply only to adoptions made before the enactment of the 1982 affidavit procedure. Birth parents in those pre-1982 adoptions who want their identities to remain concealed would need to file an affidavit.
  20. Heart-warming stories of reunions of adoptees and birth parents receive significant public attention and give open records advocates a strong platform on which to make their case. Meanwhile, birth parents who want their records kept private, almost by definition, lack a voice in the public debate.
  21. Currently, adoptees who want access to their records can appeal to a judge, who would then weigh the interests of the adoptee against those of the birth parent. That can be an expensive and time-consuming process, but one where a third party adjudicates and requires adoptees to make a case beyond genealogical curiosity.
  22. Adoptees can also request that their adoption agencies contact their birth parents or provide information such as health histories. Any legislation should give adoptees access to health information even if birth parents choose to remain anonymous.
  23. The proposed bill would change a sensitive and fundamental aspect of the adoption process retroactively. Doing so could have the unintended consequence of discouraging birth parents from considering adoption in the future, even when it's the best alternative for them and their child, because of concerns that the state might change the rules again in the future.
  24. The individual circumstances of birth parents and adoptees are so varied that it seems unwise and unfair to completely discard such a key privacy provision in a covenant as sensitive as adoption. Before requiring birth parents to come forward, more should be done to encourage disclosure and require sharing of health information without violating the privacy of birth parents.
  25. .
  26. ADOPTEE ACCESS
  27. Eight states have laws that give adult adoptees full access to their birth records, which lists the names of the birth parents, with three states enacting those laws last year alone. Should Minnesota be next?
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. business finder
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44. Advanced
  45. Search
  46.  
  47.  
  48. Auto Repair
  49. Banking
  50. Beauty Care
  51. Dentists
  52. Electricians
  53. Florists
  54. Heating
  55. Home Improvement
  56. Insurance
  57. Lawyers
  58. Physicians
  59. Plumbers
  60. Restaurants
  61. Veterinarians
  62.  
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73. StarTribune
  74.  
  75. Follow Us On:
  76.  
  77. Facebook
  78.  
  79.  
  80. Twitter
  81.  
  82.  
  83. Google+
  84.  
  85.  
  86. Pinterest
  87.  
  88.  
  89. Instagram
  90.  
  91.  
  92. Tumblr
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96.  
  97. Company
  98. About the Star Tribune
  99. Contact us
  100. Jobs
  101. News in Education
  102. City Pages
  103. High school sports hubs
  104. Mobile and tablet apps
  105.  
  106.  
  107. Advertise with us
  108. Talk with a business consultant
  109. Book a campaign online
  110. Media kit
  111. Classifieds
  112.  
  113. Buy
  114. Star Tribune Store
  115. Star Tribune Steals
  116. Archived articles
  117. Back Copies
  118. Commercial reprints
  119. Licensing
  120.  
  121.  
  122. Customer support
  123. Feedback
  124. Manage your account
  125. Newspaper subscription
  126. Digital access
  127. eEdition
  128. Vacation hold/billing
  129.  
  130.  
  131. Website
  132. Terms of use
  133. Privacy policy
  134. Site index
  135. RSS
  136.  
  137.  
  138.  
  139. © 2015 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!