Guest User

AOTY Rating Descriptor

a guest
Jul 9th, 2024
137
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.14 KB | None | 0 0
  1. WALL OF TEXT INCOMING
  2. Obviously yes, music is more than just numbers, but sometimes just saying "I liked this album" feels disingenuous to me. For me it is better to put my initial thoughts into a numbered system then also have a somewhat comprehensive written review (although I don't always do that). Overall though I still generally just like most music and its hard for most music to be "bad" or even "mid" to me.
  3.  
  4. Anyways my original system of rating was very flawed and most people generally see 6-7/10 music as "good" and my original system rated that as "mid" but that's because im American so 7/10 is bad apparently. I am now adjusting my scores to actually be sensible and not overrate albums even if I see the album as alright or okay in reality.
  5.  
  6. I chose Fantano's system not because I am a fanboy and pretentious douche (even tho maybe I am), but because I think his system works best for how I think of music as well, I simply made it more specific because I feel sometimes his system is too vague for rating and AOTY allows me to be more specific and really narrow down my thoughts of an album beyond simpler measures.
  7.  
  8. This will be a pain in the ass to do for the 200 or so albums I've rated but luckily the higher tiers won't change much as most of the music I have rated generally belongs in there and I generally still agree with most of the higher scores I have given. You may see some albums take a nosedive based on how I remember listening to them, it won't be perfect but I ought to adjust my standards.
  9.  
  10. Here is my new system of how I rate and a little description of ranges. (Remember that my written reviews will justify my ratings)
  11.  
  12. 100 (Strong 9-10) Perfect/Masterpiece/GOAT/Personal Fav
  13.  
  14. 95-99 (Decent - Strong 9) Amazing and Incredible Albums that may have only 1-2 aspects demoting it from being a 10
  15.  
  16. 90-94 (Light to Decent 9) Really good and great albums that are very enjoyable but may have some flawed aspects
  17.  
  18. 86-89 (Decent to Strong 8) Really good albums that are generally enjoyable with a few more flawed aspects.
  19.  
  20. 80-85 (Light to Decent 8) Quite Good albums that are generally enjoyable but aren't generally too special to me.
  21.  
  22. 76-79 (Decent to Strong 7) Good albums that are usually enjoyable but may have some misses.
  23.  
  24. 70-75 (Light to Decent 7) Pretty good albums that are somewhat enjoyable but have more misses.
  25.  
  26. 65-69 (Decent to Strong 6) Alright albums that likely have a few good tracks but start to have more misses.
  27.  
  28. 60-64 (Light to Decent 6) Okay albums that only have 1-2 good tracks and mostly "mid" or "bad" for everything else
  29. (ANYTHING at 5 is fully and certainly MID to me)
  30.  
  31. 55-59 (Decent to Strong 5)
  32.  
  33. 50-54 (Light to Decent 5)
  34.  
  35. 45-49 (Decent to Strong 4)
  36.  
  37. 40-44 (Light to Decent 4)
  38.  
  39. (ANYTHING BELOW THIS JUST SUCKS, THE RATINGS DON'T MATTER ANYMORE)
  40. (FUCK THE DESCRIPTIONS)
  41.  
  42. 35-39 (Decent to Strong 3)
  43.  
  44. 30-34 (Light to Decent 3)
  45.  
  46. 25-29 (Decent to Strong 2)
  47.  
  48. 20-24 (Light to Decent 2)
  49.  
  50. 15-19 (Decent to Strong 1)
  51.  
  52. 10-14 (Light to Decent 1)
  53.  
  54. 0: (FUCK WHAT I SAID PREVIOUSLY, ANYTHING AT THIS RATING DESERVES A PROMINENT DESCRIPTION)
  55. Your sins will not be forgiven at the pearly gates of the Lord
  56.  
  57.  
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment