JQ frame

I wouldnt say Jews are a race, but there are ethnic elements to it. Israel doesn't care much for Ethiopian Jews for a reason, and if 5% of Nigerians started converting... they'd care. Israel supports an identity. But there is no term "identostate"

And you can say Jews abuse the holocaust without revisionism, or thinking Hitler was good. Just like you could say Armenians would have antipathy toward Turkish groups.

Which is really the way to frame the JQ: look at how some other group with influence over a rival would operate. Or high IQ minority groups in general. I like to use the Chinese, although they're less political it would seem, they are an instructive example.

Good video. I think I linked you the pew data so I am glad it made it in.

2:15 I cringed at Lewontin's Fallacy. Personally I think diaspora Ashkenazi Jews are predisposed toward blank slatism on some level and have animosity toward white identity. The ones in Israel are probably the most chauvinistic Jews there are, due to selection bias.This mirroring the political divide among Whites I might add. But both the Israel lobby and the Fathers of the New Left have had a negative effect on our politics in my opinion, so there is bipartisan uniformity there.

Only quibble of mine is I dislike some of these JQ narratives. For instance, I think the Proselytizing Blank Slatist narrative is better than the Cunning Tribalist one. At least for the non-zionist diaspora. I think it is stronger because it isn't about whether a group is intentionally at odds with us or whether having a group in charge with no organic attachment to its host is ever good.