12 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-23 0220 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-23 0220 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/hb82TArNbo7
https://pastebin.com/1XRMNCHT
__


+Brian Hill __ The problem is that you are a stupid person who is also a *"tummy truther".* You smell some blood and you're going in for the kill *without having first thought it through.*

I have caught "Peekay" out manufacturing truther drama. I have called him an "agent against truth" (proven by his BS nonsense during "Boston" of "Jeff Bauman" ALSO BEING that "Nicholas Vogt" character; as proven by his BS nonsense about the alleged "Virginia Shooting" being filmed in two takes; and as proven with his subtle FLAT EARTH nonsense and recent admission to believing it).

It can be proven SEVERAL DIFFERENT WAYS that "Peekay" is DISHONEST and manufacturing drama.

For me to get *some* of those details wrong *does not* mean the ENTIRE CLAIM is wrong or flawed.

But yet that is precisely how worthless "tummy truthers" like you think. "Oh no, Lesta got a detail wrong - that must mean Peekay is innocent of everything!" Meanwhile he and you and other people are getting things wrong left, right and center.


*It's okay for YOU and EVERYONE ELSE to get details wrong but not Lesta!*

*If Lesta gets just ONE detail wrong it means EVERYTHING Lesta has EVER SAID or POINTED OUT is WRONG FOREVER MORE!*

>>> *Your hate makes your hypocrisy SHINE.* <<<


__


Since you cannot think I will have to *again* think it through *for you.*


*Pay attention, reatard:*


a) For you to cling to the idea it wasn't manufactured drama *you are now having to say that "Peekay" had TWO tabs open with the video.*

Where is your proof of this? How are you substantiating this claim?

Never-mind - I'll entertain it because *THIS IS WHAT I HAD SUSPECTED WAS THE CASE FROM THE OUTSET YOU SPASTIC.*

You don't seem to realise how having two browser tabs open (plus incompetence) is what busted "Peekay" manufacturing drama in the first place.


b) *In ONE of the tabs the video had "333 views" and in the other tab it had "351 views".* << ACCORDING TO YOU!


What you are now saying/admitting is that "Peekay" used the tab which showed "333 views" just to *make a SONG AND DANCE about THAT SPECIFIC NUMBER* (And did he? He SURE DID! He went on and on about the number "333"!)

Here's the part you are too slow to catch on with:

*That means that "Peekay" KNEW the view count had gone HIGHER because he ALSO had ANOTHER TAB which was at "351 views".*

So his song and dance about "333" was manufactured. It was contrived.

And what happened is that "Peekay" went through his "poor me" ritual of acknowledging the strike all as though it followed on from the "333 views" video.

But instead of switching back to the tab with "333 views" *he CLICKED THE WRONG F_KCING ONE* and it showed "351 views".

Because "Peekay" isn't too bright he probably didn't even notice or realise his error. Even if he did he probably didn't care because his audience are "THE RETARDS"!

We can BOTH AGREE that "Peekay" isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. His blind followers are EVEN MORE BLUNT.

If "Peekay" says he got a strike then by golly and by crikey he did! Why would he lie about anything?!

__

Is that accurate, "Brian Hill"?

Isn't that what you're suggesting happened?

Because what other possible INNOCENT explanation can there be? _None._

To get a detail about a claim wrong it DOES NOT FOLLOW that everything else is necessarily wrong. It does not follow the claim is also wrong.

You do not let a *rapist* walk free simply because the victim was somehow convinced a condom had *not* been used when one actually had been. _Isn't that right, "Bz"?_


I have called "Peekay" out as an agent of disinformation. I have called "Peekay" out as manufacturing truther drama. Both claims remain valid, accurate and *PROVABLE.* Nothing has changed. Getting a detail about a claim does not invalidate the claim you *SPASTIC.*


*I stand by my CLAIMS about "Peekay".* And where I have gotten any details wrong in those claims I will of course *retract* them. I will apologise and make right any wrongs that have resulted. Because that is the right thing to do. Because that is how you go about seeking true things for true reasons. *By contrast do you think "Peekay" will take down his "Virginia Shooting two takes" video?* Do you think "Peekay" will retract his claims about "Jeff Bauman" being "Nicholas Vogt"? Of course not. Because "Peekay" is here for the wrong reasons.


*You - "Brian Hill" - are a little snake who just 3 months ago said "Peekay" was a "shill" but could give us no evidence.* And now that proof exists - thanks to ME - you seem to be going to the four corners of the Earth so as to defend "Peekay"! At every opportunity you are inventing "plausible explanations" on his behalf! Almost as though it is YOU who is working in cahoots. Your misguided hate for Lesta has made you turn into a *snivelling* and wretched *"Truther Gollum".*

*Any mistake you perceive as having been made by Lesta becomes your "precious"!* So f_kc you.


__
+PartizaneProductions, +cabadejo, +Terran Downvale


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w