Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
- meenakashi.lekhi@sansad.nic.in
- Technical details of permanent failure:
- Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain sansad.nic.in by mailgw.nic.in. [164.100.10.19].
- The error that the other server returned was:
- 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
- ----- Original message -----
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
- d=iiitd.ac.in; s=google;
- h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
- bh=ePKCBjJsyhG5J8qXtg6KdoxHGhVw6bz7psvmvq4kk/w=;
- b=aERvxgg5PW1q2esDQwnNzva/yv82yMwy1umHF0FUpq23JDJA/NarWMcBGunPMPB6k2
- 2adzTp/8t8sOenmnXd8otGEXaLfV62Uqz795DZf7TK5PFiKxoHBV4zQUuIyYDRx0qicX
- eMBLaqE2Zos9zzIMprIBxgzmmQ7G6kkKy6UVM=
- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
- d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
- h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
- :content-type;
- bh=ePKCBjJsyhG5J8qXtg6KdoxHGhVw6bz7psvmvq4kk/w=;
- b=YxtzeRmQcdW9R/++guqqi35ONpMMJ3oCEkoCg81QuF0A4SmTPvN+1fXMeRlf4K6r3K
- jOfTKqhTuC9kvll1p6A/CuSIxg0ejDltqVHFJSbPcwOESPVBYdF6ll59Vg8Cbxa/VFW/
- I5nQ55R1O6Xx03ED4zz4W92Yx9WgDsAd77H/IiR6grRJ96z5RYY3HKkf6EyEs3a6OoIi
- LtusyLWvHDX2phvuaBhyTMCIGgUuycYL4XgzO/2Rhy3yUE9hWWKNM6JD0e62nhV6AmEs
- wDWA3iW2Wu4FTT/QEeh4YQ1tT2W8j0N9V908/DXtFTsnGiFTFkYnCQOCsdu5tOjTwltZ
- 4hiA==
- X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlh7fjasvsYacBIePXcBCpL5QTP9rN/8pAE34na+6bc/idAdfsW7bfA0NxIMhBH0WyxfUsbZ9M4THOycducb1lXpVrB1bdKp5kMil/twiRNQtOnPjw=
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- X-Received: by 10.50.124.102 with SMTP id mh6mr37445949igb.12.1450985905378;
- Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:38:25 -0800 (PST)
- Received: by 10.36.63.139 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:38:25 -0800 (PST)
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 01:08:25 +0530
- Message-ID: <CAPTrCxU5wdM-oaa+RaWmG_eLWM6yWcHsONf5ktmeEkb5Y+WfCw@mail.gmail.com>
- Subject: Seeking your support for Net Neutrality in Parliament
- From: Sachin Negi <sachin1421@iiitd.ac.in>
- To: meenakashi.lekhi@sansad.nic.in, mrs.mlekhi@gmail.com
- Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111c1ba76fed50527a9fba5
- To,
- Smt. Meenakashi Lekhi
- Member of Parliament, New Delhi
- Respected Madam,
- It has been nine months since over 12 lakh Indian Internet users wrote to
- the TRAI in favour of Net Neutrality. Over 450 Internet Startups wrote to
- the Prime Minister for his support in ensuring that the telecom industry
- and Facebook not to gain control over the Internet by controlling what
- users access. It has also been five months since thousands of Internet
- users, in response to a Department of Telecom committee report on Net
- Neutrality, registered on the Prime Minister’s MyGov.in website, asking the
- government of India to support Net Neutrality.
- In spite of such large scale support for Net Neutrality, including that
- from many of you in Parliament:
- * Telecom operators continue to launch services that violate Net
- Neutrality, by offering free access to services that they prefer or have
- tie-ups with.
- * Facebook continues to offer and aggressively promote its Free Basics
- (Internet.org) service, which gives a competitive advantage to Facebook and
- its partners. The Free Basics service will colonise the Indian startup
- ecosystem by making Facebook a gatekeeper and the kingmaker for any online
- website or application.
- * The Department of Telecom has not published an amended report considering
- the clear opposition in responses on MyGov.in to all forms of zero rated
- services. There has been no notice on how and when it will do so and at
- present there is a level of uncertainty and confusion which is being caused
- by some stakeholders by rolling out services which violate net neutrality.
- At the same time, telecom operators are partnering with Facebook to run Net
- Neutrality violating services like Internet.org/Free Basics. These services
- are aggressively expanding without due respect for the sanctity of ongoing
- regulatory processes. It is relevant to mention that the DOT draft report
- in Para 12.7 and 12.8 calls for a complete prohibition specifically on
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment