sachin26

Mrs.Lekhi

Dec 26th, 2015
33
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.11 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
  2.  
  3. meenakashi.lekhi@sansad.nic.in
  4.  
  5. Technical details of permanent failure:
  6. Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain sansad.nic.in by mailgw.nic.in. [164.100.10.19].
  7.  
  8. The error that the other server returned was:
  9. 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
  10.  
  11.  
  12. ----- Original message -----
  13.  
  14. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
  15. d=iiitd.ac.in; s=google;
  16. h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
  17. bh=ePKCBjJsyhG5J8qXtg6KdoxHGhVw6bz7psvmvq4kk/w=;
  18. b=aERvxgg5PW1q2esDQwnNzva/yv82yMwy1umHF0FUpq23JDJA/NarWMcBGunPMPB6k2
  19. 2adzTp/8t8sOenmnXd8otGEXaLfV62Uqz795DZf7TK5PFiKxoHBV4zQUuIyYDRx0qicX
  20. eMBLaqE2Zos9zzIMprIBxgzmmQ7G6kkKy6UVM=
  21. X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
  22. d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
  23. h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
  24. :content-type;
  25. bh=ePKCBjJsyhG5J8qXtg6KdoxHGhVw6bz7psvmvq4kk/w=;
  26. b=YxtzeRmQcdW9R/++guqqi35ONpMMJ3oCEkoCg81QuF0A4SmTPvN+1fXMeRlf4K6r3K
  27. jOfTKqhTuC9kvll1p6A/CuSIxg0ejDltqVHFJSbPcwOESPVBYdF6ll59Vg8Cbxa/VFW/
  28. I5nQ55R1O6Xx03ED4zz4W92Yx9WgDsAd77H/IiR6grRJ96z5RYY3HKkf6EyEs3a6OoIi
  29. LtusyLWvHDX2phvuaBhyTMCIGgUuycYL4XgzO/2Rhy3yUE9hWWKNM6JD0e62nhV6AmEs
  30. wDWA3iW2Wu4FTT/QEeh4YQ1tT2W8j0N9V908/DXtFTsnGiFTFkYnCQOCsdu5tOjTwltZ
  31. 4hiA==
  32. X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlh7fjasvsYacBIePXcBCpL5QTP9rN/8pAE34na+6bc/idAdfsW7bfA0NxIMhBH0WyxfUsbZ9M4THOycducb1lXpVrB1bdKp5kMil/twiRNQtOnPjw=
  33. MIME-Version: 1.0
  34. X-Received: by 10.50.124.102 with SMTP id mh6mr37445949igb.12.1450985905378;
  35. Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:38:25 -0800 (PST)
  36. Received: by 10.36.63.139 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:38:25 -0800 (PST)
  37. Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 01:08:25 +0530
  38. Message-ID: <CAPTrCxU5wdM-oaa+RaWmG_eLWM6yWcHsONf5ktmeEkb5Y+WfCw@mail.gmail.com>
  39. Subject: Seeking your support for Net Neutrality in Parliament
  40. From: Sachin Negi <sachin1421@iiitd.ac.in>
  41. To: meenakashi.lekhi@sansad.nic.in, mrs.mlekhi@gmail.com
  42. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111c1ba76fed50527a9fba5
  43.  
  44. To,
  45.  
  46. Smt. Meenakashi Lekhi
  47.  
  48. Member of Parliament, New Delhi
  49.  
  50. Respected Madam,
  51.  
  52. It has been nine months since over 12 lakh Indian Internet users wrote to
  53. the TRAI in favour of Net Neutrality. Over 450 Internet Startups wrote to
  54. the Prime Minister for his support in ensuring that the telecom industry
  55. and Facebook not to gain control over the Internet by controlling what
  56. users access. It has also been five months since thousands of Internet
  57. users, in response to a Department of Telecom committee report on Net
  58. Neutrality, registered on the Prime Minister’s MyGov.in website, asking the
  59. government of India to support Net Neutrality.
  60.  
  61. In spite of such large scale support for Net Neutrality, including that
  62. from many of you in Parliament:
  63.  
  64. * Telecom operators continue to launch services that violate Net
  65. Neutrality, by offering free access to services that they prefer or have
  66. tie-ups with.
  67.  
  68. * Facebook continues to offer and aggressively promote its Free Basics
  69. (Internet.org) service, which gives a competitive advantage to Facebook and
  70. its partners. The Free Basics service will colonise the Indian startup
  71. ecosystem by making Facebook a gatekeeper and the kingmaker for any online
  72. website or application.
  73.  
  74. * The Department of Telecom has not published an amended report considering
  75. the clear opposition in responses on MyGov.in to all forms of zero rated
  76. services. There has been no notice on how and when it will do so and at
  77. present there is a level of uncertainty and confusion which is being caused
  78. by some stakeholders by rolling out services which violate net neutrality.
  79.  
  80. At the same time, telecom operators are partnering with Facebook to run Net
  81. Neutrality violating services like Internet.org/Free Basics. These services
  82. are aggressively expanding without due respect for the sanctity of ongoing
  83. regulatory processes. It is relevant to mention that the DOT draft report
  84. in Para 12.7 and 12.8 calls for a complete prohibition specifically on
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment