16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-16 0600 +The Color Out of Space

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-16 0600 +The Color Out of Space
https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/FvnBLPvVn8a
https://pastebin.com/1A8Thgwt
__

+The Color Out of Space __ *If sufficient proof for a claim has been presented then it becomes unreasonable to reject that claim*.

If indeed that's what we are looking at then we can reasonably ask the following (and more):

1. Why this video appears to be the exception *rather than the rule*.

2. Why we don't see this with a *full body video* (he is up close making the possibility for deceit *magnitudes easier*).

3. Why we don't see this same sustained duration with other things in addition to eating such as water bubbles, gyroscopes, magnets, etc. Can't these people talk to us about the virtue of studying hard while doing that?

4. Why we see only brief and horrendous 1980s quality video of the "experiments" they allegedly do such as with spider's weaving webs and ants trotting about for food etc.

5. >> *Why we don't see this kind of thing with a "live video"*! <<

With regard to the last point:

When we watch the long duration "live streams" we see far more than ten minutes at a time without cuts, edits and pans *but they are always filled with glitches*. (Whereas with the pre-recorded footage it's the opposite: we don't see glitches but it's always filled with cuts and pans. It's an inverse relationship between live footage and pre-recorded.)

Since it is clear that "NASA" *do* edit at least some of the "live-streams" before posting them to the Internet/YouTube (for example - we often see videos where it switches from "astronaut" to "interviewer" and the delays appear to have been removed) *then why wouldn't "NASA" use the footage that has been captured by the camera and not rely on a captured "live-stream"*?

In case I have worded that poorly:

The camera we are seeing is allegedly broadcasting a live signal. We are told it is filled with glitches due to technical reasons (though "technical reasons" that don't seem to affect the external HD camera in the same way!). *But yet the camera would be recording locally on the "ISS" as well*. Which means there can exist a nice glitch-free HD version of any/every "live interview".

And so it is possible that the local HD recording without any satellite glitches could be used. After all - "NASA" is devoting time, money and manpower into "putting the interviews together" during "post production" *so why not take advantage of the original HD footage before it got corrupted with alleged broadcasting/satellite problems*?


>> While we may not expect that to be the case *all* of the time - _nor even *most* of the time_ - but after more than 15 years should we not have expected it for at least *some* of the time?! <<


The fact that finding a 10 minute segment without apparent glitches, cuts, edits and pans is *rare* strongly suggests that the presence of these things are intentional and desired by the people releasing the footage.

It is *obvious* to me that even if the "ISS" is real and manned - *we are supposed to see the glitches*. I posted about that here: https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/K11yBKsWkbm

>> And to say it again - *if the "ISS" is real and manned then it is being presented in a wholly doubtable form*. <<

Merely because one (or a handful) of the videos are convincing should not make us overlook the fact that *all the rest of it* is NOT convincing and *CAN* be doubted.

How often does a professional charlatan like "Peekay HIDES Truth" promote obvious bullsh!t and when called out for it people reply "but he did great work with Boston!"

Now imagine every time you point out the flaws of an "ISS" video an "ISS apologist" were to respond with: but what about that eating video?!

Just because something appears to be genuine doesn't mean all of it is genuine. And it certainly doesn't mean it's not being misrepresented. There is no doubt that the "NASA astronauts" cannot speak Russian. Yet we are routinely told they learn the language. Why would a serious and honest organisation that prides itself on having access to the "best of the best" lie/misrepresent about such a thing?

Tell enough lies and *some* will be convincing!

That every "live interview" is presented to us in a way that could have been pre-recorded should not be overlooked merely because "JAXA" have managed to do what "NASA" haven't and post a 10 minute video without any apparent glitches, cuts, edits and pans.

But on that note! Keep in mind - he is up close to the camera at all times. If we go through the video - just what is the longest *actual* duration of *undeniable* zero-gravity?

For example - while his tinned "cat food" floats about in the air - let's consider that proof of zero-gravity. While his zipper is floating about - let's consider that proof of zero-gravity. (On that note: how often do we see "astronauts" wearing clothing with zippers that float about like his does? Is that not a subtle suggestion: "Can't you see that I'm in zero gravity!" - this is the kind of detail you'd expect "David Blaine" to use in order to sell an illusion.)



>>>>> *But if we subtract all of the moments when he is holding everything in his hands AND simultaneously obscuring his floating zipper - then just how much genuine zero-gravity are we witnessing*? <<<<<



Because this is a pre-recorded piece of footage (and "JAXA" seem to spend a long time between allegedly recording a video and posting it to YouTube) *we have to be far more strict with it*.

I gave many additional points in my messages above (especially the one with the example of "David Blaine" cutting an assistant in half in front of a live audience versus him simply showing that audience *pre-recorded footage* of him cutting an assistant in half).

__

To repeat: *When sufficient proof for an event or claim has been genuinely presented to the audience it becomes unreasonable to reject that event/claim*. _But is that really what we're seeing?!_

Personally - I am inclined to believe the "ISS" could be real and manned but that it is being presented to us in an intentionally crippled form. *Which is consistent with the lie system principles I have been describing*.

__

Finally - if the "ISS" is *not* real and manned then we would expect the kind of footage we see because it is always possible a non conspiracy theorist might ask: "Hey - I heard that there are no clips longer than 10 minutes without glitches, cuts, edits and pans?" and that person can be given a link to this video to satisfy them that the claim is false and that obviously "all conspiracy theorists are retarded and everyone who questions NASA believes the Earth is flat anyway".

__
+nationalparksign


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.