JaysonSunshine

Veganism, future duties, generalized duties in community

Jun 20th, 2021
129
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.03 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. infspire_
  3. puyt: Are you vegan?
  4. puyt
  5. no
  6. infspire_
  7. Why not?
  8. puyt
  9. im eating meatballs right now
  10. puyt
  11. because vegan food sucks
  12. infspire_
  13. puyt: Do you have any duties to others?
  14. 22:16 puyt
  15. vegan food
  16. puyt
  17. and vegan people
  18. puyt
  19. no
  20. infspire_
  21. You no duties to any others in any contexts?
  22. puyt
  23. no
  24. infspire_
  25. You have no duties to any others in any contexts?*
  26. infspire_
  27. I put puyt on lifetime block.
  28. infspire_
  29. Reason: No duties to others in any contexts.
  30. infspire_
  31. If anybody would like me to refute their carnism, I can do it in a few questions.
  32. infspire_
  33. Here's a simple version:
  34. infspire_
  35. 1) You honor people in the past who made sacrifices for people in the future, right? For example, dying in World War 2, standing up to Nazis, refusing to leave towns by sunset, etc.
  36. infspire_
  37. 2) To honor something is to do more than just say 'I honor that thing', right? You have to modify your behavior at least somewhat so that it is congruent with their sacrifice. If somebody died protesting your right to vote, and you don't even vote, then you wouldn't be honoring that thing.
  38. infspire_
  39. 3) By not being vegan today, you're imposing tremendous costs on future humans in the form of climate change effects, ecosystem annihilation, and viral pandemics. We can lessen those harms by possibly 90% by having a vegan diet. Having a vegan diet, if you really don't want to do it, is a sacrifice. This sacrifice is far less substantial -- than dying to vote, or risking police brutality, or fighting on Normandy.
  40. infspire_
  41. 4) By not having a vegan diet, you're actually making it impossible to essentially value any sacrifice of any past person. It's all just talk that you contradict with your daily behavior.
  42. infspire_
  43. There are several ways out of these argument:
  44. infspire_
  45. For example, you could say I don't value people who have sacrificed for others.
  46. infspire_
  47. However, living in community with others entails sacrifice, and so you shall be banned from all communities if you don't value their necessary precursors, as you're just a parasite.
  48. infspire_
  49. Such as puyt.
  50. infspire_
  51. It seems it should be impossible to have communities without sacrifice. I'll give an example for physical communities and digital communities:
  52. infspire_
  53. 1) physical: your proximity to others entails risk for them as you may be a source of contagious pathogen without your knowing it
  54. infspire_
  55. 2) digital: the expressions of your mind may be propaganda/information warfare elements you don't recognize that harm the minds of those who receive them
  56. you has left IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
  57. you has joined ([email protected])
  58. longstree has changed mode: +v you
  59. infspire_
  60. (There are some notions in anarcho-syndicalism/anarchism/libertarian socialism about communities free of coercion which might be argued as being near/equivalent to duty-free communities.
  61. infspire_
  62. I believe my two examples above refute that notion.
  63. infspire_
  64. This makes me think about what is the appropriate relationships between 'risk' in relationship/community and duty.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment