What Is The Militarist Interventionist Agenda?>

Socially we've entered a new age in which the Polarists have reasonably separated themselves from the Circumstantialists (and I only think this occurred), this happened because a unique situation occurred which really drew attention to a certain problem - where someone who was once flying high found themselves in special circumstances beyond their control that would have reasonably destroyed their reputation in that era too had those circumstances recreated themselves back then. The difference in circumstances is then seen as (reasonably) the only reasonable difference between the two situations.

But there is an elephant in the room, and that elephant is the potential for the rescue of all victims.

The reasonable ideology for fulfilling that goal is Militarism (insofar as a certain axiom or two*).

There are two different ways (and maybe more)for Militarists to view this author.

1. A reasonable distraction to the goal
2. A perfect or nearly perfect shit test

I do not know how this faction views me at this time, and I do not wish to know for certain reasons that may not be obvious.

*That the minds are reasonably moldable to it (Militarism) or that it can be enforced